Port-Site Metastasis (PSM): Definition, clinical contexts and possible preventive actions to reduce risk

Perrotta Giulio
{"title":"Port-Site Metastasis (PSM): Definition, clinical contexts and possible preventive actions to reduce risk","authors":"Perrotta Giulio","doi":"10.17352/2455-2968.000144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The \"port-site metastasis\" represents a tumor recurrence that develops in the abdominal wall within the scar tissue of the insertion site of one or more trocars, after laparoscopic surgery, not associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis. This last aspect is central because in the literature some isolated cases are reported, but most cases are associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis. The first case in the literature dates back to 1978 and in the literature, the incidence varies from 1% to 21%, although most published research reports a very small number of patients. Currently, the incidence in a specialized cancer center is consistent with the incidence of recurrence on a laparotomy scar. Possible mechanisms for cell implantation at the port site are direct implantation into the wound during forced, unprotected tissue retrieval or from contaminated instruments during tumor dissection; the effect of gas turbulence in lengthy laparoscopic procedures, and embolization of exfoliated cells during tumor dissection or hematogenous spread. Probably, however, the triggering mechanism is necessarily multifactorial. To date, the only significant prognostic factor in patients diagnosed with port-site metastasis is the interval between laparoscopy and the diagnosis of the port site: in fact, patients who develop the port site within 7 months after surgery have a generally worse prognosis, as well as port-site metastasis are more frequent in advanced cancers and the presence of ascites. To reduce the risk, the following measures are proposed in the literature: 1) Select the patient who does not have a metastatic oncologic condition or friable cancerous masses or lymph node spread or attached external or intracystic vegetations, preferring well-localized, benign or low-malignant or otherwise intact tumors; 2) Use wound protectors and use of protective bags (or endo bag) for tissue retrieval; 3) Peritoneal washing with heparin, to prevent free cell adhesion, or washing with cytocidal solutions. Evaluate the utility of using Povidone-iodine, Taurolidine (which has anti-adhesion activity and decreases proangiogenic factors), and chemotherapy products; 4) Avoid removing pneumoperitoneum with trocars in place; 5) Avoiding direct contact between the solid tumor and the port site; 6) Prefer laparoscopy to laparotomy, if possible; 7) Avoid the use of gas or direct CO2 insufflation, although in literature the point is controversial and deserves more attention and study, as the initial hypothesis that CO2 increased the invasion capacity of tumor cells (in vitro and in vivo) has been refuted several times. Insufflation of hyperthermic CO2 and humidified CO2 leads to a better outcome in patients with a malignant tumor who undergo a laparoscopic procedure compared with normal CO2 pneumoperitoneum; 8) Comply with surgical protocols and techniques by updating one's surgical skills, as it has been demonstrated, as already reported here, the presence of cancerous cells on instruments, washing systems and trocars (in particular, on the trocars of the first operator). Suturing all layers of the abdominal wall decreases the risk of the port site; 9) Avoid excessive manipulation of the tumor mass during the surgical/operative procedure.","PeriodicalId":93785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgery and surgical research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgery and surgical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-2968.000144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The "port-site metastasis" represents a tumor recurrence that develops in the abdominal wall within the scar tissue of the insertion site of one or more trocars, after laparoscopic surgery, not associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis. This last aspect is central because in the literature some isolated cases are reported, but most cases are associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis. The first case in the literature dates back to 1978 and in the literature, the incidence varies from 1% to 21%, although most published research reports a very small number of patients. Currently, the incidence in a specialized cancer center is consistent with the incidence of recurrence on a laparotomy scar. Possible mechanisms for cell implantation at the port site are direct implantation into the wound during forced, unprotected tissue retrieval or from contaminated instruments during tumor dissection; the effect of gas turbulence in lengthy laparoscopic procedures, and embolization of exfoliated cells during tumor dissection or hematogenous spread. Probably, however, the triggering mechanism is necessarily multifactorial. To date, the only significant prognostic factor in patients diagnosed with port-site metastasis is the interval between laparoscopy and the diagnosis of the port site: in fact, patients who develop the port site within 7 months after surgery have a generally worse prognosis, as well as port-site metastasis are more frequent in advanced cancers and the presence of ascites. To reduce the risk, the following measures are proposed in the literature: 1) Select the patient who does not have a metastatic oncologic condition or friable cancerous masses or lymph node spread or attached external or intracystic vegetations, preferring well-localized, benign or low-malignant or otherwise intact tumors; 2) Use wound protectors and use of protective bags (or endo bag) for tissue retrieval; 3) Peritoneal washing with heparin, to prevent free cell adhesion, or washing with cytocidal solutions. Evaluate the utility of using Povidone-iodine, Taurolidine (which has anti-adhesion activity and decreases proangiogenic factors), and chemotherapy products; 4) Avoid removing pneumoperitoneum with trocars in place; 5) Avoiding direct contact between the solid tumor and the port site; 6) Prefer laparoscopy to laparotomy, if possible; 7) Avoid the use of gas or direct CO2 insufflation, although in literature the point is controversial and deserves more attention and study, as the initial hypothesis that CO2 increased the invasion capacity of tumor cells (in vitro and in vivo) has been refuted several times. Insufflation of hyperthermic CO2 and humidified CO2 leads to a better outcome in patients with a malignant tumor who undergo a laparoscopic procedure compared with normal CO2 pneumoperitoneum; 8) Comply with surgical protocols and techniques by updating one's surgical skills, as it has been demonstrated, as already reported here, the presence of cancerous cells on instruments, washing systems and trocars (in particular, on the trocars of the first operator). Suturing all layers of the abdominal wall decreases the risk of the port site; 9) Avoid excessive manipulation of the tumor mass during the surgical/operative procedure.
港口转移(PSM):定义,临床背景和可能的预防措施,以减少风险
“port-site metastasis”是指在腹腔镜手术后,在腹壁一个或多个套管针插入部位的疤痕组织内发生的肿瘤复发,与腹膜癌无关。最后一个方面是中心的,因为在文献中有一些孤立的病例报道,但大多数病例与腹膜癌有关。文献中的第一例病例可以追溯到1978年,在文献中,发病率从1%到21%不等,尽管大多数已发表的研究报告的患者数量非常少。目前,专科癌症中心的发生率与剖腹手术疤痕的复发率一致。可能的细胞移植机制是在强制的、无保护的组织提取过程中直接植入伤口,或者在肿瘤解剖过程中从受污染的器械中植入;气体湍流对长时间腹腔镜手术的影响,以及肿瘤剥离或血液扩散过程中脱落细胞的栓塞。然而,触发机制可能是多因素的。迄今为止,诊断为port site转移的患者唯一重要的预后因素是腹腔镜检查与port site诊断之间的间隔时间:事实上,术后7个月内出现port site的患者通常预后较差,并且port site转移在晚期癌症和存在腹水的患者中更为常见。为了降低风险,文献中提出了以下措施:1)选择无转移性肿瘤、易碎癌性肿块、淋巴结扩散或附着囊外或囊内植被的患者,选择定位良好、良性或低恶性或其他完整的肿瘤;2)使用伤口保护器,使用保护袋(或内袋)进行组织回收;3)用肝素清洗腹膜,防止游离细胞粘附,或用杀细胞液清洗。评估使用聚维酮-碘、牛磺酸丁(具有抗粘连活性并降低促血管生成因子)和化疗产品的效用;4)避免在套管针到位的情况下取出气腹;5)避免实体瘤与port部位直接接触;6)如有可能,首选腹腔镜手术,而非剖腹手术;7)避免使用气体或直接注入二氧化碳,虽然这一点在文献中存在争议,值得更多的关注和研究,因为最初的假设,即二氧化碳增加肿瘤细胞的侵袭能力(在体外和体内)已被多次反驳。与正常CO2气腹相比,在恶性肿瘤患者行腹腔镜手术时,注入高温CO2和加湿CO2可获得更好的结果;8)通过更新自己的手术技能来遵守手术方案和技术,正如这里已经报道的那样,在器械、洗涤系统和套管针上(特别是在第一位手术者的套管针上)存在癌细胞。缝合腹壁的所有层可以降低端口部位的风险;9)外科/手术过程中避免过度操作肿瘤肿块。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信