Geometry Teaching in the Early Years: A History that Encourages Reflections on the Present

Q3 Multidisciplinary
Maria Cristina Araújo de Oliveira, Reginaldo Fernando Carneiro
{"title":"Geometry Teaching in the Early Years: A History that Encourages Reflections on the Present","authors":"Maria Cristina Araújo de Oliveira, Reginaldo Fernando Carneiro","doi":"10.17648/acta.scientiae.7056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Geometry seems to cause some strangeness and resistance when present in children's education over time and suggests that this characteristic is not exclusive to primary education or the initial years. Objective: To historically analyse two discourses that integrate proposals for teaching geometry present in current documents and programs, especially the National Common Curricular Base (BNCC) and the National Pact for Literacy at the Right Age (PNAIC): the plane-space relationship and the prominence of observation, manipulation, comparison, and visualization in learning geometry. Design: Based on themes for teaching geometry, proposals for teaching geometry in the early years and the historical relationships that can be established around them are discussed. Settings and Participants: current documents and programs that integrate proposals for teaching geometry in the early years. Data collection and analysis: Considering results obtained within the scope of research projects about the teaching of geometry in a historical perspective, located in the field of History of Mathematics Education and also in studies on the BNCC and the PNAIC, we proceeded with a new analytical elaboration. Results: Proposals for teaching geometry that last for many generations are highlighted, even with different objectives and purposes in each era. Observation, manipulation and comparison are also verified as strategies for teaching this theme that last over time. Conclusions: The dialogue between geometry teaching issues and its history of this teaching makes it possible to build a broader understanding of the difficulties and to elaborate proposals that can take into account the knowledge already produced.","PeriodicalId":36967,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Geometry seems to cause some strangeness and resistance when present in children's education over time and suggests that this characteristic is not exclusive to primary education or the initial years. Objective: To historically analyse two discourses that integrate proposals for teaching geometry present in current documents and programs, especially the National Common Curricular Base (BNCC) and the National Pact for Literacy at the Right Age (PNAIC): the plane-space relationship and the prominence of observation, manipulation, comparison, and visualization in learning geometry. Design: Based on themes for teaching geometry, proposals for teaching geometry in the early years and the historical relationships that can be established around them are discussed. Settings and Participants: current documents and programs that integrate proposals for teaching geometry in the early years. Data collection and analysis: Considering results obtained within the scope of research projects about the teaching of geometry in a historical perspective, located in the field of History of Mathematics Education and also in studies on the BNCC and the PNAIC, we proceeded with a new analytical elaboration. Results: Proposals for teaching geometry that last for many generations are highlighted, even with different objectives and purposes in each era. Observation, manipulation and comparison are also verified as strategies for teaching this theme that last over time. Conclusions: The dialogue between geometry teaching issues and its history of this teaching makes it possible to build a broader understanding of the difficulties and to elaborate proposals that can take into account the knowledge already produced.
早期的几何教学:一段值得反思的历史
背景:随着时间的推移,几何在儿童教育中似乎会引起一些奇怪和阻力,这表明这种特征并不局限于小学教育或最初几年。目的:从历史上分析当前文件和计划中提出的两篇整合了几何教学建议的论文,特别是《国家通用课程库》(BNCC)和《适龄识字国家公约》(PNAIC):平面空间关系以及几何学习中观察、操作、比较和可视化的突出地位。设计:根据几何教学的主题,讨论了早期几何教学的建议以及围绕这些建议可以建立的历史关系。设置和参与者:当前的文件和程序,整合了早期几何教学的建议。数据收集和分析:考虑到在数学教育史领域以及对BNCC和PNAIC的研究中,从历史的角度对几何教学的研究项目范围内获得的结果,我们进行了新的分析阐述。结果:强调了持续数代人的几何教学建议,即使每个时代的目标和目的不同。观察、操作和比较也被验证为教学这一主题的策略,这些策略会随着时间的推移而持续。结论:几何教学问题与其教学历史之间的对话使我们有可能对困难有更广泛的理解,并根据已经产生的知识提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Scientiae
Acta Scientiae Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信