Dietary changes could compensate for potential yield reductions upon global river flow protection

IF 4.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J. Braun, F. Stenzel, B. Bodirsky, M. Jalava, D. Gerten
{"title":"Dietary changes could compensate for potential yield reductions upon global river flow protection","authors":"J. Braun, F. Stenzel, B. Bodirsky, M. Jalava, D. Gerten","doi":"10.1017/sus.2022.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-technical summary Globally, freshwater systems are degrading due to excessive water withdrawals. We estimate that if rivers’ environmental flow requirements were protected, the associated decrease in irrigation water availability would reduce global yields by ~5%. As one option to increase food supply within limited water resources, we show that dietary changes toward less livestock products could compensate for this effect. If all currently grown edible feed was directly consumed by humans, we estimate that global food supply would even increase by 19%. We thus provide evidence that dietary changes are an important strategy to harmonize river flow protection with sustained food supply. Technical summary To protect global freshwater ecosystems and restore their integrity, freshwater withdrawals could be restricted to maintain rivers' environmental flow requirements (EFRs). However, without further measures, reduced irrigation water availability would decrease crop yields and put additional pressure on global food provision. By comparing the quantitative effects of both global EFR protection and dietary changes on regional and global food supply in a spatially explicit modeling framework, we show that dietary changes toward less livestock products could effectively contribute to solving this trade-off. Results indicate that protection of EFRs would almost halve current global irrigation water withdrawals and reduce global crop yields by 5%. Limiting animal protein share to 25, 12.5 and 0% of total protein supply and shifting released crop feed to direct human consumption could however increase global food supply by 4, 11 and 19%, respectively. The effects are geographically decoupled: water-scarce regions such as the Middle East, or South and Central Asia would be most affected by EFR protection, whereas dietary changes are most effective in North America and Europe. This underpins the disproportionally high responsibilities of countries with resource-intensive diets and the need for regionally adapted and diverse strategies to transform the global food system toward sustainability. Social media summary Combining dietary changes and global river flow protection could contribute to a more sustainable food system.","PeriodicalId":36849,"journal":{"name":"Global Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2022.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-technical summary Globally, freshwater systems are degrading due to excessive water withdrawals. We estimate that if rivers’ environmental flow requirements were protected, the associated decrease in irrigation water availability would reduce global yields by ~5%. As one option to increase food supply within limited water resources, we show that dietary changes toward less livestock products could compensate for this effect. If all currently grown edible feed was directly consumed by humans, we estimate that global food supply would even increase by 19%. We thus provide evidence that dietary changes are an important strategy to harmonize river flow protection with sustained food supply. Technical summary To protect global freshwater ecosystems and restore their integrity, freshwater withdrawals could be restricted to maintain rivers' environmental flow requirements (EFRs). However, without further measures, reduced irrigation water availability would decrease crop yields and put additional pressure on global food provision. By comparing the quantitative effects of both global EFR protection and dietary changes on regional and global food supply in a spatially explicit modeling framework, we show that dietary changes toward less livestock products could effectively contribute to solving this trade-off. Results indicate that protection of EFRs would almost halve current global irrigation water withdrawals and reduce global crop yields by 5%. Limiting animal protein share to 25, 12.5 and 0% of total protein supply and shifting released crop feed to direct human consumption could however increase global food supply by 4, 11 and 19%, respectively. The effects are geographically decoupled: water-scarce regions such as the Middle East, or South and Central Asia would be most affected by EFR protection, whereas dietary changes are most effective in North America and Europe. This underpins the disproportionally high responsibilities of countries with resource-intensive diets and the need for regionally adapted and diverse strategies to transform the global food system toward sustainability. Social media summary Combining dietary changes and global river flow protection could contribute to a more sustainable food system.
饮食变化可以弥补全球河流流量保护可能导致的产量下降
非技术性摘要在全球范围内,淡水系统因过度取水而退化。我们估计,如果河流的环境流量需求得到保护,灌溉水可用性的相关下降将使全球产量下降约5%。作为在有限的水资源范围内增加粮食供应的一种选择,我们表明,减少畜产品的饮食变化可以弥补这种影响。如果目前种植的所有可食用饲料都被人类直接食用,我们估计全球粮食供应甚至会增加19%。因此,我们提供了证据,证明改变饮食是协调河流流量保护和持续粮食供应的重要战略。技术摘要为了保护全球淡水生态系统并恢复其完整性,可以限制淡水抽取,以维持河流的环境流量要求。然而,如果不采取进一步措施,灌溉水供应量的减少将降低作物产量,并给全球粮食供应带来额外压力。通过在一个空间明确的建模框架中比较全球EFR保护和饮食变化对区域和全球粮食供应的定量影响,我们表明,朝着减少畜产品的方向改变饮食可以有效地帮助解决这种权衡。结果表明,EFR的保护将使目前全球灌溉用水量几乎减半,并使全球作物产量减少5%。然而,将动物蛋白质份额限制在总蛋白质供应的25%、12.5%和0%,并将释放的作物饲料转移到人类直接消费,可能会使全球粮食供应分别增加4%、11%和19%。这种影响在地理上是脱钩的:中东、南亚和中亚等缺水地区受EFR保护的影响最大,而北美和欧洲的饮食变化最为有效。这就决定了资源密集型饮食国家承担着不成比例的高责任,需要采取区域适应和多样化的战略,将全球粮食系统转变为可持续性。社交媒体摘要将饮食变化和全球河流流量保护相结合,有助于建立一个更可持续的粮食系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Sustainability
Global Sustainability Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
19
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信