Optical granulometry of coarse aggregates and sediments

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Maja Matič, N. Bezak, Mikoš Matjaž
{"title":"Optical granulometry of coarse aggregates and sediments","authors":"Maja Matič, N. Bezak, Mikoš Matjaž","doi":"10.15292/acta.hydro.2019.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to determine the granularity of the material, image analysis may be used instead of traditional methods such as sieving. Data on granulometry is important in the water management sector for several practical applications, such as calculation of sediment transport capacity in watercourses, design of hydraulic structures, or modeling of debris flows. The WipFrag and Basegrain programs were tested on the case study of the Belca rockfall and the Sava Dolinka River’s gravel bar near the village of Mojstrana. In both cases, multiple images were taken from different heights and sieve analysis was performed. The results of both programs were compared with the results of the sieving analysis. The results showed that WipFrag yielded more comparable results with the sieving analysis than Basegrain. WipFrag gave slightly better results in the case of the Belca rockfall than in the case of the river gravel bar. The Basegrain program, on the other hand, produced similarly comparable results in both case studies. In most cases, both programs underestimated the grain size compared to the results of the sieving analysis. In some cases, the relative differences were close to 100%. On the other hand, the selected statistical test did not show a statistically significant difference between the results of the sieving analysis and the results of the image analysis in both of the programs. Optimal image analysis results were obtained from images taken from the height of about 1.5-2 m, which means that we suggest that photos of aggregates, fluvial sediments, and erosion material should be taken from a height of approximately ten times the maximum grain size.","PeriodicalId":36671,"journal":{"name":"Acta Hydrotechnica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Hydrotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15292/acta.hydro.2019.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In order to determine the granularity of the material, image analysis may be used instead of traditional methods such as sieving. Data on granulometry is important in the water management sector for several practical applications, such as calculation of sediment transport capacity in watercourses, design of hydraulic structures, or modeling of debris flows. The WipFrag and Basegrain programs were tested on the case study of the Belca rockfall and the Sava Dolinka River’s gravel bar near the village of Mojstrana. In both cases, multiple images were taken from different heights and sieve analysis was performed. The results of both programs were compared with the results of the sieving analysis. The results showed that WipFrag yielded more comparable results with the sieving analysis than Basegrain. WipFrag gave slightly better results in the case of the Belca rockfall than in the case of the river gravel bar. The Basegrain program, on the other hand, produced similarly comparable results in both case studies. In most cases, both programs underestimated the grain size compared to the results of the sieving analysis. In some cases, the relative differences were close to 100%. On the other hand, the selected statistical test did not show a statistically significant difference between the results of the sieving analysis and the results of the image analysis in both of the programs. Optimal image analysis results were obtained from images taken from the height of about 1.5-2 m, which means that we suggest that photos of aggregates, fluvial sediments, and erosion material should be taken from a height of approximately ten times the maximum grain size.
粗集料和沉积物的光学粒度测定法
为了确定物料的粒度,可以使用图像分析代替传统的方法,如筛分。粒度测定法的数据在水管理部门的几个实际应用中是重要的,例如水道输沙能力的计算、水工结构的设计或泥石流的建模。WipFrag和Basegrain程序在Mojstrana村附近的Belca岩崩和Sava Dolinka河砾石坝的案例研究中进行了测试。在这两种情况下,从不同高度拍摄多幅图像并进行筛分分析。将两种方案的结果与筛分分析结果进行了比较。结果表明,WipFrag的筛分分析结果比Basegrain的筛分分析结果更具可比性。WipFrag在贝尔卡岩崩的情况下给出的结果略好于河流砾石坝的情况。另一方面,Basegrain程序在两个案例研究中产生了类似的可比较结果。在大多数情况下,与筛分分析的结果相比,这两个程序都低估了粒度。在某些情况下,相对差异接近100%。另一方面,所选择的统计检验在两个程序中筛分分析的结果和图像分析的结果之间没有统计学上的显著差异。从1.5-2 m高度拍摄的图像获得了最佳的图像分析结果,这意味着我们建议从大约10倍于最大粒度的高度拍摄骨料,河流沉积物和侵蚀物质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Hydrotechnica
Acta Hydrotechnica Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信