Relationship between Intracranial Pressure or Cerebral PerfusionPressure and Prognosis in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain InjuryTreated with Mild Hypothermia

Koichi Hayakawa, O. Tasaki, Hiromu Iwamura, Daiki Wada, Fukuki Saitou, Jiro Iba, Kazuhisa Yoshiya, H. Ikegawa, T. Shiozaki, Y. Nakamori, S. Fujimi, T. Shimazu, Y. Kuwagata
{"title":"Relationship between Intracranial Pressure or Cerebral PerfusionPressure and Prognosis in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain InjuryTreated with Mild Hypothermia","authors":"Koichi Hayakawa, O. Tasaki, Hiromu Iwamura, Daiki Wada, Fukuki Saitou, Jiro Iba, Kazuhisa Yoshiya, H. Ikegawa, T. Shiozaki, Y. Nakamori, S. Fujimi, T. Shimazu, Y. Kuwagata","doi":"10.4172/2167-1222.1000380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: The purpose of this study was to predict the clinical course by intracranial pressure (ICP) or cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in the acute phase and prognosis in patients with severe head trauma who underwent therapeutic mild hypothermia (HT). \nMethods: A consecutive 143 patients treated with HT for intracranial hypertension (ICH) in two trauma centers were included in this study. The pressure measured after computed tomography scanning was defined as the initial ICP or CPP. Outcome was assessed at 6 months according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale. ROC analysis was performed to clarify the threshold value of ICP/CPP predictive of ICP uncontrollable by HT. \nResults: The cutoff value of ICP for uncontrollable ICP obtained from ROC analysis was 32.5 mmHg (sensitivity: 0.545, specificity: 0.875), and that for CPP was 56.5 mmHg (sensitivity: 0.813, specificity: 0.663). Fifty-three (96.4%) of 55 patients whose initial ICP was greater than 32.5 mmHg and 67 (95.7%) of 70 patients whose initial CPP was less than 56.5 mmHg had developed uncontrollable ICP. \nConclusion: The cutoff values predictive of ICP uncontrollable by HT from ROC analysis were 32.5 mmHg for ICP and 56.5 mmHg for CPP. For those patients with initial ICP greater than the cutoff value or an initial CPP less than the cutoff value, it may be harmful to prolong HT. The knowledge obtained from this study may be useful for considering the treatment strategy for severe traumatic brain injury.","PeriodicalId":90636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trauma & treatment","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-1222.1000380","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trauma & treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1222.1000380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of this study was to predict the clinical course by intracranial pressure (ICP) or cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in the acute phase and prognosis in patients with severe head trauma who underwent therapeutic mild hypothermia (HT). Methods: A consecutive 143 patients treated with HT for intracranial hypertension (ICH) in two trauma centers were included in this study. The pressure measured after computed tomography scanning was defined as the initial ICP or CPP. Outcome was assessed at 6 months according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale. ROC analysis was performed to clarify the threshold value of ICP/CPP predictive of ICP uncontrollable by HT. Results: The cutoff value of ICP for uncontrollable ICP obtained from ROC analysis was 32.5 mmHg (sensitivity: 0.545, specificity: 0.875), and that for CPP was 56.5 mmHg (sensitivity: 0.813, specificity: 0.663). Fifty-three (96.4%) of 55 patients whose initial ICP was greater than 32.5 mmHg and 67 (95.7%) of 70 patients whose initial CPP was less than 56.5 mmHg had developed uncontrollable ICP. Conclusion: The cutoff values predictive of ICP uncontrollable by HT from ROC analysis were 32.5 mmHg for ICP and 56.5 mmHg for CPP. For those patients with initial ICP greater than the cutoff value or an initial CPP less than the cutoff value, it may be harmful to prolong HT. The knowledge obtained from this study may be useful for considering the treatment strategy for severe traumatic brain injury.
亚低温治疗重型颅脑损伤患者的颅内压或脑灌注压与预后的关系
目的:本研究旨在通过急性期颅内压(ICP)或脑灌注压(CPP)预测重度颅脑外伤患者行治疗性亚低温(HT)治疗后的临床病程及预后。方法:对连续143例在两家外伤中心接受HT治疗的颅内高压(ICH)患者进行研究。计算机断层扫描后测量的压力被定义为初始ICP或CPP。根据格拉斯哥结果量表在6个月时评估结果。采用ROC分析明确ICP/CPP阈值预测HT无法控制的ICP。结果:ROC分析所得不可控ICP的ICP临界值为32.5 mmHg(敏感性0.545,特异性0.875),CPP的ICP临界值为56.5 mmHg(敏感性0.813,特异性0.663)。55例初始ICP大于32.5 mmHg的患者中53例(96.4%)发生了不可控的ICP, 70例初始ICP小于56.5 mmHg的患者中67例(95.7%)发生了不可控的ICP。结论:ROC分析预测ICP不可控的临界值ICP为32.5 mmHg, CPP为56.5 mmHg。对于初始ICP大于临界值或初始CPP小于临界值的患者,延长HT可能是有害的。本研究结果可为重型颅脑外伤的治疗策略提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信