Psychological distress in survivors of childhood cancer and their parents before and after a follow-up appointment: the need for screening and validation of the emotion thermometer

E. Harju, Katharina Roser, B. Eisenreich, K. Scheinemann, Gisela Michel
{"title":"Psychological distress in survivors of childhood cancer and their parents before and after a follow-up appointment: the need for screening and validation of the emotion thermometer","authors":"E. Harju, Katharina Roser, B. Eisenreich, K. Scheinemann, Gisela Michel","doi":"10.1097/OR9.0000000000000097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Abstract Background: Childhood cancer affects patients and their parents. Childhood cancer survivors are at risk of mental health problems. Regular psychological screening is recommended. The emotion thermometer (ET) is a short, validated tool to detect psychological distress in adult patients with cancer. However, its suitability and acceptability in young cancer populations have not yet been reported. We (1) describe mental health in survivors and their parents before and after a follow-up appointment and (2) investigate the ET's usefulness for screening in young childhood cancer survivors. Methods: Survivors (15 years or older at study, ≥1 year after treatment ended) and their parents completed two electronic surveys to assess mental health (including somatization, depression, anxiety, a Global Severity Index [GSI], fear of cancer recurrence/relapse and post-traumatic stress). The first questionnaire was completed in the weeks leading up to the follow-up appointment and the second one after. We assessed survivors' opinion on acceptability of the ET. Results: Forty-five survivors (age at study: 22 years, 54% female) and 46 parents (age: 54 years, 63% female) participated. Scores for somatization, depression, and the GSI were lower after the appointment (p<.05 for all). For parents, there was no change. A subset of survivors reported clinically relevant post-traumatic stress (Nbefore = 3 [8%], Nafter = 4 [10%]). Fear of cancer recurrence/relapse remained stable. The ET identified moderate-to-severe distress in 13 survivors (29%), showing good specificity (0.91) and sensitivity (0.91) in relation to the gold standard Symptom Checklist-90-R. Survivors found the ET to be easy to use and understand. Conclusions: Psychological distress in survivors attending follow-up care is common, and screening is imperative. The ET may be helpful for initial psychological screening.","PeriodicalId":73915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Abstract Background: Childhood cancer affects patients and their parents. Childhood cancer survivors are at risk of mental health problems. Regular psychological screening is recommended. The emotion thermometer (ET) is a short, validated tool to detect psychological distress in adult patients with cancer. However, its suitability and acceptability in young cancer populations have not yet been reported. We (1) describe mental health in survivors and their parents before and after a follow-up appointment and (2) investigate the ET's usefulness for screening in young childhood cancer survivors. Methods: Survivors (15 years or older at study, ≥1 year after treatment ended) and their parents completed two electronic surveys to assess mental health (including somatization, depression, anxiety, a Global Severity Index [GSI], fear of cancer recurrence/relapse and post-traumatic stress). The first questionnaire was completed in the weeks leading up to the follow-up appointment and the second one after. We assessed survivors' opinion on acceptability of the ET. Results: Forty-five survivors (age at study: 22 years, 54% female) and 46 parents (age: 54 years, 63% female) participated. Scores for somatization, depression, and the GSI were lower after the appointment (p<.05 for all). For parents, there was no change. A subset of survivors reported clinically relevant post-traumatic stress (Nbefore = 3 [8%], Nafter = 4 [10%]). Fear of cancer recurrence/relapse remained stable. The ET identified moderate-to-severe distress in 13 survivors (29%), showing good specificity (0.91) and sensitivity (0.91) in relation to the gold standard Symptom Checklist-90-R. Survivors found the ET to be easy to use and understand. Conclusions: Psychological distress in survivors attending follow-up care is common, and screening is imperative. The ET may be helpful for initial psychological screening.
儿童癌症幸存者及其父母随访前后的心理困扰:情绪温度计筛选和验证的必要性
补充数字内容可在文本中获得。背景:儿童癌症影响患者及其父母。儿童癌症幸存者面临心理健康问题的风险。建议定期进行心理筛查。情绪温度计(ET)是一种简短的、经过验证的工具,用于检测成年癌症患者的心理困扰。然而,它在年轻癌症人群中的适用性和可接受性尚未报道。我们(1)描述了幸存者及其父母在随访预约前后的心理健康状况,(2)调查了ET在年轻儿童癌症幸存者筛查中的有用性。方法:幸存者(研究时15岁或以上,治疗结束后≥1年)及其父母完成两份电子调查,评估心理健康状况(包括躯体化、抑郁、焦虑、全球严重程度指数[GSI]、对癌症复发/复发的恐惧和创伤后应激)。第一份问卷是在随访前几周完成的,第二份是在随访后几周完成的。我们评估了幸存者对ET可接受性的看法。结果:45名幸存者(研究年龄:22岁,54%为女性)和46名父母(年龄:54岁,63%为女性)参与了研究。躯体化、抑郁和GSI得分在预约后较低(p< 0.05)。所有人都是05)。对于父母来说,没有变化。一部分幸存者报告了临床相关的创伤后应激(Nbefore = 3 [8%], Nafter = 4[10%])。对癌症复发的恐惧保持稳定。ET在13名幸存者(29%)中确定了中度至重度痛苦,与金标准症状检查表-90- r相比,显示出良好的特异性(0.91)和敏感性(0.91)。幸存者发现外星人很容易使用和理解。结论:参加随访护理的幸存者的心理困扰是常见的,筛查是必要的。ET可能有助于初步的心理筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信