Understanding the dynamics of non-clinical staff reallocation to clinical practice during the first wave of COVID-19—a qualitative study
IF 1
R. L. R. Johansen, Anita Sørensen, Mads S. Langelo, K. H. Mikkelsen, Christina Emme
{"title":"Understanding the dynamics of non-clinical staff reallocation to clinical practice during the first wave of COVID-19—a qualitative study","authors":"R. L. R. Johansen, Anita Sørensen, Mads S. Langelo, K. H. Mikkelsen, Christina Emme","doi":"10.21037/jhmhp-22-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic one responsive strategy to ensure hospital staff capacity was reallocation of staff between departments. Unpredicted factors may influence how such a strategy is executed and knowledge of potential moderating factors is essential to improve future staff contingency plans. The aim of this study was to explore the dynamics of reallocating non-clinical staff from departments with low activity to clinical practice during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic at a 530-bed university hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark. Methods: This was a qualitative study based on six individual semi-structured interviews with non-clinical staff who were reallocated during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and eight interviews with leaders from departments reallocating staff. Data was analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: The results showed that implementation of a staff contingency plan is influenced by a complex set of structural, perceptional, social, individual, and psychological moderating factors. Even though staff felt obligated and motivated to work and intended to cover shifts, reallocation was influenced by several other factors related to the contingency plan set-up, how the contingency plan and roles were interpreted by staff and leaders, how the leaders prioritized tasks and staff time, and the feeling of psychological safety. We found that staff and leaders interpreted the contingency plan in a social context, navigated the system, and made individual adjustments. Conclusions: This study sheds light on the dynamics of a reallocation process of non-clinical staff during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reallocation is affected by a complex set of structural, perceptional, social, individual, and psychological moderating factors. Future staff contingency plans should take these factors into consideration to make better use of human resources in times of crisis and to improve staff experience with reallocation. © 2022 The authors.","PeriodicalId":92075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-22-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic one responsive strategy to ensure hospital staff capacity was reallocation of staff between departments. Unpredicted factors may influence how such a strategy is executed and knowledge of potential moderating factors is essential to improve future staff contingency plans. The aim of this study was to explore the dynamics of reallocating non-clinical staff from departments with low activity to clinical practice during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic at a 530-bed university hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark. Methods: This was a qualitative study based on six individual semi-structured interviews with non-clinical staff who were reallocated during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and eight interviews with leaders from departments reallocating staff. Data was analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: The results showed that implementation of a staff contingency plan is influenced by a complex set of structural, perceptional, social, individual, and psychological moderating factors. Even though staff felt obligated and motivated to work and intended to cover shifts, reallocation was influenced by several other factors related to the contingency plan set-up, how the contingency plan and roles were interpreted by staff and leaders, how the leaders prioritized tasks and staff time, and the feeling of psychological safety. We found that staff and leaders interpreted the contingency plan in a social context, navigated the system, and made individual adjustments. Conclusions: This study sheds light on the dynamics of a reallocation process of non-clinical staff during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reallocation is affected by a complex set of structural, perceptional, social, individual, and psychological moderating factors. Future staff contingency plans should take these factors into consideration to make better use of human resources in times of crisis and to improve staff experience with reallocation. © 2022 The authors.
了解第一波COVID-19期间非临床工作人员重新分配到临床实践的动态——一项定性研究
背景:在2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行期间,确保医院工作人员能力的一个应对策略是在部门之间重新分配工作人员。不可预测的因素可能会影响这种战略的执行方式,了解潜在的调节因素对于改进未来的工作人员应急计划至关重要。本研究的目的是探索在新冠肺炎大流行的第一波期间,在丹麦首都地区一所拥有530个床位的大学医院,将非临床工作人员从活动较少的部门重新分配到临床实践的动态。方法:这是一项定性研究,基于对新冠肺炎第一波疫情期间重新分配的非临床工作人员的六次个人半结构化访谈,以及对重新分配工作人员的部门领导的八次访谈。数据采用归纳内容分析法进行分析。结果:结果表明,员工应急计划的实施受到一系列复杂的结构、感知、社会、个人和心理调节因素的影响。尽管工作人员感到有义务和动力工作,并打算轮班,但重新分配受到与应急计划设置、工作人员和领导如何解释应急计划和角色、领导如何优先考虑任务和工作人员时间以及心理安全感相关的其他几个因素的影响。我们发现,员工和领导在社会背景下解读应急计划,驾驭系统,并进行个人调整。结论:本研究揭示了新冠肺炎第一波疫情期间非临床工作人员重新分配过程的动态。再分配受到一系列复杂的结构、感知、社会、个人和心理调节因素的影响。未来的工作人员应急计划应考虑到这些因素,以便在危机时期更好地利用人力资源,并改善工作人员的调动经验。©2022作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。