Portrait of a Prospector: Edward Schieffelin’s Own Story

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY
Louise M. Ratliff
{"title":"Portrait of a Prospector: Edward Schieffelin’s Own Story","authors":"Louise M. Ratliff","doi":"10.1080/00822884.2021.1891382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"language. Cohen observes that “Statistics from the late Ottoman period indicate that even those non-Muslims who attended imperial schools or secured government employment were less likely than Muslims to climb the ranks of the bureaucracy. Even more than other nonMuslim groups, Jews felt obstacles to entering state service, as few among them were proficient in Ottoman, the language of imperial officialdom” p. 11). Also, commanding Cohen’s attention and scholarly treatment are two events few historians have focused on before or since. One is the massacre of Armenians in 1896 in some neighborhoods of Istanbul. Cohen points to both Jewish protection of the Armenians and, at the same time, looting of their properties. She stresses the Jews’ ambivalence toward the event, given this ambiguity. The other event Cohen covers with equal, if not greater, attention is the state visit of Sultan Mehmet V in 1911 to Salonica used by the Jews to demonstrate their patriotism by contributing most of the 26 celebratory arches. These and Ottoman Jews’ other attempts to rise to the ranks of imperial citizens bore less than the desired fruit. Much of the reason was external to them, that is, beyond their control, namely, a period of turmoil which saw the war against Russia (1877–1878), against Greece over Crete (1897), in the Balkans, marked by the loss of Salonica to Greece in 1912, deteriorating economic conditions and governance as a whole, rising interest in socialism and Zionism, and emigration as a popular option. Cohen examines these and other events and their consequences in great depth, like Sir Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes, and presents them with the precision of a scientific writer like Isaac Asimov, and the skill of a dramatist like Shakespeare. Her big opus received numerous awards and prizes. This is not surprising. The book fills a void in Ottoman and Sephardi historiography—the ultimate aspiration of an academic work such as this. If it has any weaknesses, they stem from the book’s and its author’s strengths. They are, in a nutshell, the need for more—an update or follow-up. The Ottoman Empire gave way to a modern Turkey of 18 million people, a Turkey that now boasts 82 million whose identity, governance, politics, and alliances are still evolving. Meanwhile, its Sephardi population has dwindled from a peak of nearly a hundred thousand in the young Turkish Republic a century ago to a mere 15,000–20,000 today. What has becoming a Turk meant since becoming Ottomans was the question? What does it mean now? Fortunately for philo-Turks and Sephardi fans, Cohen is young, curious, and seemingly committed enough to provide answers ofthe same quality that she did in her Becoming Ottomans: Sephardi Jews and Imperial Citizenship in the Modern Era.","PeriodicalId":40672,"journal":{"name":"Terrae Incognitae-The Journal of the Society for the History of Discoveries","volume":"53 1","pages":"69 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00822884.2021.1891382","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terrae Incognitae-The Journal of the Society for the History of Discoveries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00822884.2021.1891382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

language. Cohen observes that “Statistics from the late Ottoman period indicate that even those non-Muslims who attended imperial schools or secured government employment were less likely than Muslims to climb the ranks of the bureaucracy. Even more than other nonMuslim groups, Jews felt obstacles to entering state service, as few among them were proficient in Ottoman, the language of imperial officialdom” p. 11). Also, commanding Cohen’s attention and scholarly treatment are two events few historians have focused on before or since. One is the massacre of Armenians in 1896 in some neighborhoods of Istanbul. Cohen points to both Jewish protection of the Armenians and, at the same time, looting of their properties. She stresses the Jews’ ambivalence toward the event, given this ambiguity. The other event Cohen covers with equal, if not greater, attention is the state visit of Sultan Mehmet V in 1911 to Salonica used by the Jews to demonstrate their patriotism by contributing most of the 26 celebratory arches. These and Ottoman Jews’ other attempts to rise to the ranks of imperial citizens bore less than the desired fruit. Much of the reason was external to them, that is, beyond their control, namely, a period of turmoil which saw the war against Russia (1877–1878), against Greece over Crete (1897), in the Balkans, marked by the loss of Salonica to Greece in 1912, deteriorating economic conditions and governance as a whole, rising interest in socialism and Zionism, and emigration as a popular option. Cohen examines these and other events and their consequences in great depth, like Sir Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes, and presents them with the precision of a scientific writer like Isaac Asimov, and the skill of a dramatist like Shakespeare. Her big opus received numerous awards and prizes. This is not surprising. The book fills a void in Ottoman and Sephardi historiography—the ultimate aspiration of an academic work such as this. If it has any weaknesses, they stem from the book’s and its author’s strengths. They are, in a nutshell, the need for more—an update or follow-up. The Ottoman Empire gave way to a modern Turkey of 18 million people, a Turkey that now boasts 82 million whose identity, governance, politics, and alliances are still evolving. Meanwhile, its Sephardi population has dwindled from a peak of nearly a hundred thousand in the young Turkish Republic a century ago to a mere 15,000–20,000 today. What has becoming a Turk meant since becoming Ottomans was the question? What does it mean now? Fortunately for philo-Turks and Sephardi fans, Cohen is young, curious, and seemingly committed enough to provide answers ofthe same quality that she did in her Becoming Ottomans: Sephardi Jews and Imperial Citizenship in the Modern Era.
探索者肖像:爱德华·席菲林自己的故事
语言Cohen观察到“奥斯曼帝国晚期的统计数据表明,即使是那些上过帝国学校或获得政府工作的非穆斯林,也比穆斯林更不可能晋升为官僚机构的成员。与其他非穆斯林群体相比,犹太人更感到进入国家服务的障碍,因为他们中很少有人精通奥斯曼帝国的语言”(第11页)。此外,引起科恩的注意和学术待遇是历史学家以前或以后很少关注的两件事。其中之一是1896年在伊斯坦布尔的一些街区发生的亚美尼亚人大屠杀。科恩指出,犹太人既保护亚美尼亚人,又掠夺他们的财产。她强调,鉴于这种模糊性,犹太人对这一事件的矛盾心理。科恩关注的另一件事是苏丹穆罕默德五世1911年对萨洛尼卡的国事访问,犹太人利用这一访问展示了他们的爱国主义,贡献了26个庆祝拱门中的大部分。这些人和奥斯曼帝国犹太人试图晋升为帝国公民的其他尝试并没有取得预期的成果。大部分原因是他们外部的,也就是说,超出了他们的控制范围,即在一段动荡时期,对俄罗斯的战争(1877-1878),对希腊的克里特岛战争(1897),巴尔干半岛的战争,以1912年萨洛尼卡输给希腊为标志,经济状况和治理整体恶化,对社会主义和犹太复国主义的兴趣上升,移民成为一种流行的选择。科恩深入研究了这些和其他事件及其后果,比如柯南·道尔爵士的《福尔摩斯》,并以艾萨克·阿西莫夫这样的科学作家的精确性和莎士比亚这样的剧作家的技巧呈现了这些事件。她的巨著获得了无数奖项。这并不奇怪。这本书填补了奥斯曼和塞法迪史学的空白——这是像这样的学术著作的终极愿望。如果说它有任何弱点,那都源于这本书和作者的长处。简言之,它们是对更多的需求——更新或后续行动。奥斯曼帝国让位于拥有1800万人口的现代土耳其,这个土耳其现在拥有8200万人口,其身份、治理、政治和联盟仍在演变。与此同时,其塞法迪人口已从一个世纪前年轻的土耳其共和国近十万的峰值减少到今天的15000至20000人。问题是,自从成为奥斯曼人以来,成为土耳其人意味着什么?现在这意味着什么?幸运的是,对于philo Turks和Sephardi的粉丝来说,Cohen年轻、好奇,似乎有足够的决心提供与她在《成为奥斯曼人:现代的Sephardi犹太人和帝国公民》中所做的相同质量的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信