{"title":"Orthography, ideology and the codification of Mauritian Creole","authors":"Tejshree Auckle","doi":"10.1075/jpcl.22018.auc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper examines the choices made at the levels of Ausbau (‘language by development’, Kloss 1967: 29–30) and Abstand (‘language by distance’, ibid) during the codification phase of Mauritian\n Creole. Using the document Lortograf Kreol Morisien (Ministry of Education\n and Human Resources 2011) as its focal point, it studies the co-association between Ausbau and Abstand and connects the\n choices made to a broader ideological framework which sets out to ‘promot[e] our country’s language’ (Hookoomsing 2011: 9). It explores the implication of adopting a linguistic form which a user can\n ‘intimately connect with loved ones, community and personal identity’ (Delpit 2006: 95)\n while simultaneously providing it with the stature traditionally enjoyed by the lexifier. In the final instance it views the\n decreasing Abstand of Mauritian Creole as a form of prestige planning (Haarmann 1986)\n carried out with the possible intention of enhancing its public image.","PeriodicalId":43608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.22018.auc","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines the choices made at the levels of Ausbau (‘language by development’, Kloss 1967: 29–30) and Abstand (‘language by distance’, ibid) during the codification phase of Mauritian
Creole. Using the document Lortograf Kreol Morisien (Ministry of Education
and Human Resources 2011) as its focal point, it studies the co-association between Ausbau and Abstand and connects the
choices made to a broader ideological framework which sets out to ‘promot[e] our country’s language’ (Hookoomsing 2011: 9). It explores the implication of adopting a linguistic form which a user can
‘intimately connect with loved ones, community and personal identity’ (Delpit 2006: 95)
while simultaneously providing it with the stature traditionally enjoyed by the lexifier. In the final instance it views the
decreasing Abstand of Mauritian Creole as a form of prestige planning (Haarmann 1986)
carried out with the possible intention of enhancing its public image.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages (JPCL) aims to provide a forum for the scholarly study of pidgins, creoles, and other contact language varieties, from multi-disciplinary perspectives. The journal places special emphasis on current research devoted to empirical description, theoretical issues, and the broader implications of the study of contact languages for theories of language acquisition and change, and for linguistic theory in general. The editors also encourage contributions that explore the application of linguistic research to language planning, education, and social reform, as well as studies that examine the role of contact languages in the social life and culture, including the literature, of their communities.