Asthma control in Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan, Kuantan, Malaysia: a cross-sectional study

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Y. Kuan, C. H. Tan, C. M. Hong, S. How
{"title":"Asthma control in Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan, Kuantan, Malaysia: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Y. Kuan, C. H. Tan, C. M. Hong, S. How","doi":"10.31436/IMJM.V14I2.433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Various initiatives and medications have been introduced to achieve better control of bronchial asthma. However total control according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) remains elusive even at tertiary referral hospitals. Our study is to determine the level of asthma control (according to GINA 2009), Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores and the types of medications used among patients with bronchial asthma in a large tertiary hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study of all patients with bronchial asthma who attended the Chest Clinic at Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan (HTAA) from 2009 to 2011. Patient demographics, self-administered ACT scores, GINA-defined level of asthma control and medications were documented. Results: 208 patients were recruited. There were 23.2%, 46.3% and 30.5% of patients with controlled, partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma respectively. The median ACT scores was 19 [inter quartile range (IQR) 6]. The most frequently used preventer therapy was inhaled long-acting β-agonist/corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) fixed-dose combination (61.7%), and 9.6% were not on preventer therapy. 75% of patients with controlled asthma were on LABA/ICS compared to 58.5% of the partly controlled and uncontrolled groups (p=0.039). Conclusion: The majority of the asthmatic patients attending the Chest Clinic at HTAA did not have GINA-defined controlled asthma. Patients with higher ACT scores had better control of asthma. There were more patients with controlled asthma who were on LABA/ ICS combination.","PeriodicalId":53575,"journal":{"name":"International Medical Journal Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Medical Journal Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/IMJM.V14I2.433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Various initiatives and medications have been introduced to achieve better control of bronchial asthma. However total control according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) remains elusive even at tertiary referral hospitals. Our study is to determine the level of asthma control (according to GINA 2009), Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores and the types of medications used among patients with bronchial asthma in a large tertiary hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study of all patients with bronchial asthma who attended the Chest Clinic at Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan (HTAA) from 2009 to 2011. Patient demographics, self-administered ACT scores, GINA-defined level of asthma control and medications were documented. Results: 208 patients were recruited. There were 23.2%, 46.3% and 30.5% of patients with controlled, partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma respectively. The median ACT scores was 19 [inter quartile range (IQR) 6]. The most frequently used preventer therapy was inhaled long-acting β-agonist/corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) fixed-dose combination (61.7%), and 9.6% were not on preventer therapy. 75% of patients with controlled asthma were on LABA/ICS compared to 58.5% of the partly controlled and uncontrolled groups (p=0.039). Conclusion: The majority of the asthmatic patients attending the Chest Clinic at HTAA did not have GINA-defined controlled asthma. Patients with higher ACT scores had better control of asthma. There were more patients with controlled asthma who were on LABA/ ICS combination.
马来西亚关丹东姑阿普曼阿夫赞医院哮喘控制:一项横断面研究
简介:为了更好地控制支气管哮喘,已经引入了各种措施和药物。然而,即使在三级转诊医院,根据全球哮喘倡议(GINA)的全面控制仍然难以捉摸。我们的研究旨在确定某大型三级医院支气管哮喘患者的哮喘控制水平(根据GINA 2009)、哮喘控制测试(ACT)评分和使用的药物类型。方法:对2009 - 2011年在东古阿姆普曼阿夫扎医院胸科门诊就诊的所有支气管哮喘患者进行横断面研究。记录患者的人口统计资料、自我管理的ACT评分、gina定义的哮喘控制水平和药物。结果:共纳入208例患者。哮喘控制、部分控制和不控制分别占23.2%、46.3%和30.5%。ACT得分中位数为19[四分位间距(IQR) 6]。最常用的预防剂治疗是吸入长效β激动剂/皮质类固醇(LABA/ICS)固定剂量组合(61.7%),9.6%未使用预防剂治疗。75%的控制哮喘患者使用LABA/ICS,而部分控制组和未控制组的这一比例为58.5% (p=0.039)。结论:在HTAA胸科门诊就诊的大多数哮喘患者没有gina定义的受控哮喘。ACT得分越高的患者哮喘控制越好。LABA/ ICS联合用药的哮喘控制患者较多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Medical Journal Malaysia
International Medical Journal Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: International Medical Journal Malaysia (IMJM) is the official journal of the Kulliyyah (Faculty) of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia. It serves primarily as a forum for education and intellectual discourse for health professionals namely in clinical medicine but covers diverse issues relating to medical ethics, professionalism as well as medical developments and research in basic medical sciences. It also serves the unique purpose of highlighting issues and research pertaining to the Muslim world. Contributions to the IMJM reflect its international and multidisciplinary readership and include current thinking across a range of specialties, ethnicities and societies.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信