C. Merow, Peter J. Galante, J. Kass, Matthew E. Aiello‐Lammens, Cecina Babich Morrow, B. Gerstner, Valentina Grisales Betancur, Alex C. Moore, E. Noguera-Urbano, G. Pinilla‐Buitrago, R. Anderson, M. Blair
{"title":"Operationalizing expert knowledge in species' range estimates using diverse data types","authors":"C. Merow, Peter J. Galante, J. Kass, Matthew E. Aiello‐Lammens, Cecina Babich Morrow, B. Gerstner, Valentina Grisales Betancur, Alex C. Moore, E. Noguera-Urbano, G. Pinilla‐Buitrago, R. Anderson, M. Blair","doi":"10.21425/f5fbg53589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"for poorly sampled species, estimate biodiversity, and inform conservation decisions. Abstract Estimates of species’ ranges can inform many aspects of biodiversity research and conservation‐management decisions. Many practical applications need high‐precision range estimates that are sufficiently reliable to use as input data in downstream applications. One solution has involved expert‐generated maps that reflect on‐the‐ground field information and implicitly capture various processes that may limit a species’ geographic distribution. However, expert maps are often subjective and rarely reproducible. In contrast, species distribution models (SDMs) typically have finer resolution and are reproducible because of explicit links to data. Yet, SDMs can have higher uncertainty when data are sparse, which is an issue for most species. Also, SDMs often capture only a subset of the factors that determine species distributions (e.g., climate) and hence can require significant post‐ processing to better estimate species’ current realized distributions. Here, we demonstrate how expert knowledge, diverse data types, and SDMs can be used together in a transparent and reproducible modeling workflow. Specifically, we show how expert knowledge regarding species’ habitat use, elevation, biotic interactions, and environmental tolerances can be used to make and refine range estimates using SDMs and various data sources, including high‐resolution remotely sensed products. This range‐refinement approach is primed to use various data sources, including many with continuously improving spatial or temporal resolution. To facilitate such analyses, we compile a comprehensive suite of tools in a new R package, maskRangeR, and provide worked examples. These tools can facilitate a wide variety of basic and applied research that requires high‐resolution maps of species’ current","PeriodicalId":37788,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Biogeography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21425/f5fbg53589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
for poorly sampled species, estimate biodiversity, and inform conservation decisions. Abstract Estimates of species’ ranges can inform many aspects of biodiversity research and conservation‐management decisions. Many practical applications need high‐precision range estimates that are sufficiently reliable to use as input data in downstream applications. One solution has involved expert‐generated maps that reflect on‐the‐ground field information and implicitly capture various processes that may limit a species’ geographic distribution. However, expert maps are often subjective and rarely reproducible. In contrast, species distribution models (SDMs) typically have finer resolution and are reproducible because of explicit links to data. Yet, SDMs can have higher uncertainty when data are sparse, which is an issue for most species. Also, SDMs often capture only a subset of the factors that determine species distributions (e.g., climate) and hence can require significant post‐ processing to better estimate species’ current realized distributions. Here, we demonstrate how expert knowledge, diverse data types, and SDMs can be used together in a transparent and reproducible modeling workflow. Specifically, we show how expert knowledge regarding species’ habitat use, elevation, biotic interactions, and environmental tolerances can be used to make and refine range estimates using SDMs and various data sources, including high‐resolution remotely sensed products. This range‐refinement approach is primed to use various data sources, including many with continuously improving spatial or temporal resolution. To facilitate such analyses, we compile a comprehensive suite of tools in a new R package, maskRangeR, and provide worked examples. These tools can facilitate a wide variety of basic and applied research that requires high‐resolution maps of species’ current
期刊介绍:
Frontiers of Biogeography is the scientific magazine of the International Biogeography Society (http://www.biogeography.org/). Our scope includes news, original research letters, reviews, opinions and perspectives, news, commentaries, interviews, and articles on how to teach, disseminate and/or apply biogeographical knowledge. We accept papers on the study of the geographical variations of life at all levels of organization, including also studies on temporal and/or evolutionary variations in any component of biodiversity if they have a geographical perspective, as well as studies at relatively small scales if they have a spatially explicit component.