Evaluation of animal safe places for emergency evacuation in the Hunter Region of New South Wales, Australia

IF 0.9 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
O. E. Ogunmakinde, T. Egbelakin, Robert Henderson
{"title":"Evaluation of animal safe places for emergency evacuation in the Hunter Region of New South Wales, Australia","authors":"O. E. Ogunmakinde, T. Egbelakin, Robert Henderson","doi":"10.1108/ijdrbe-10-2022-0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis project aims to improve understanding of disaster preparedness and resilience, as well as animal recovery during a disaster event. The purpose of this study is to determine the type and extent of repair/renovation work required to bring proposed animal safe places and their different components up to the minimum standard for an operational animal evacuation site.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nOn-site survey using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire was used to collect data through a five stage processes beginning with the creation of a facility register and continuing with the development of assessment guidelines, assessment planning, actual assessment and reporting. In the Hunter Region of New South Wales, Australia, 25 potential animal evacuation sites, including saleyards, showgrounds, animal shelters and racecourses, were identified and accessed.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings of the study reveals that none of the facilities are of high standard. However, 16% would require cosmetic work, 76% would require minor work and the remaining facilities would require significant work. According to the characteristics of the facilities assessed, saleyards have a greater capacity to accommodate animals ranging in size from large to small. More than half of the facilities have average to excellent hay sheds and wash bays, whereas less than half have dedicated animal quarantine space.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe findings of this study should assist government agencies, local councils, emergency management teams and other stakeholders in planning for and considering renovation/upgrade of potential animal safe places.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe assessment guideline developed as part of this research can be included in the local council’s emergency management plan to improve adequate planning for safe animal evacuation.\n","PeriodicalId":45983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdrbe-10-2022-0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This project aims to improve understanding of disaster preparedness and resilience, as well as animal recovery during a disaster event. The purpose of this study is to determine the type and extent of repair/renovation work required to bring proposed animal safe places and their different components up to the minimum standard for an operational animal evacuation site. Design/methodology/approach On-site survey using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire was used to collect data through a five stage processes beginning with the creation of a facility register and continuing with the development of assessment guidelines, assessment planning, actual assessment and reporting. In the Hunter Region of New South Wales, Australia, 25 potential animal evacuation sites, including saleyards, showgrounds, animal shelters and racecourses, were identified and accessed. Findings The findings of the study reveals that none of the facilities are of high standard. However, 16% would require cosmetic work, 76% would require minor work and the remaining facilities would require significant work. According to the characteristics of the facilities assessed, saleyards have a greater capacity to accommodate animals ranging in size from large to small. More than half of the facilities have average to excellent hay sheds and wash bays, whereas less than half have dedicated animal quarantine space. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study should assist government agencies, local councils, emergency management teams and other stakeholders in planning for and considering renovation/upgrade of potential animal safe places. Originality/value The assessment guideline developed as part of this research can be included in the local council’s emergency management plan to improve adequate planning for safe animal evacuation.
澳大利亚新南威尔士州猎人地区紧急疏散动物安全场所的评估
目的:本项目旨在提高对灾害准备和恢复力以及灾害事件中动物恢复的理解。这项研究的目的是确定所需维修/翻新工程的类型和程度,以使拟议的动物安全地点及其不同组成部分达到可运作的动物疏散地点的最低标准。设计/方法/方法使用李克特五点量表进行现场调查,通过五个阶段的过程收集数据,从建立设施登记册开始,继续制定评估指南、评估计划、实际评估和报告。在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的亨特地区,确定并进入了25个潜在的动物疏散地点,包括销售场、展示场、动物收容所和赛马场。调查结果调查结果表明,没有一个设施是高标准的。然而,16%需要进行装饰工作,76%需要进行少量工作,其余设施需要进行大量工作。根据所评估设施的特点,饲养场有更大的能力容纳大小不一的动物。超过一半的设施拥有平均到优秀的干草棚和洗漱湾,而只有不到一半的设施拥有专门的动物检疫空间。研究的局限/意义本研究的结果应协助政府机构、地方议会、应急管理小组和其他利益相关者规划和考虑潜在动物安全场所的翻新/升级。原创性/价值作为这项研究的一部分制定的评估准则可纳入地方议会的应急管理计划,以改进对动物安全疏散的充分规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信