Choice of law and jurisdiction in banking and finance contracts after Brexit: a perspective from Europe

Q2 Social Sciences

Law and Financial Markets Review Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/17521440.2020.1759233

Oriol Espar, J. Castell

引用次数: 1

Abstract

English law is the preferred law for banking and finance transactions whether they take place in the United Kingdom or not. When opting for English law to govern a contract, the choice of the jurisdiction of the English courts usually follows suit. The European Union’s favourable regimes of several recognition and enforcement of Judgments, especially the Brussels I Recast regulation, have made it even more attractive for member state’s banks. But given that this regime changes after Brexit, will this privileged position of the UK be jeopardised?

查看原文本刊更多论文

英国脱欧后银行和金融合同的法律选择和管辖权:一个来自欧洲的视角

无论银行和金融交易是否发生在英国，英国法律都是首选法律。当选择英国法律管辖合同时，通常也会选择英国法院的管辖权。欧盟在承认和执行若干判决方面的有利制度，特别是布鲁塞尔第一次修订规定，使其对成员国的银行更具吸引力。但考虑到英国脱欧后这一制度发生变化，英国的这一特权地位会受到威胁吗?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Law and Financial Markets Review LAW-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Law and Financial Markets Review is a new, independent, English language journal devoted to providing high quality information, comment and analysis for lawyers specialising in banking and financial market issues and to others with interests in legal and regulatory developments affecting the financial markets. Published four times a year LFMR contains articles written by leading experts providing a forum for practical guidance on, as well as reflective and topical analysis of, all major jurisdictions, with a particular focus on the interaction between the law and market practice and behaviour.