Use of tailoring features and reasons for dropout in a guided internet-based transdiagnostic individually-tailored cognitive behavioral therapy for symptoms of depression and/or anxiety in college students

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Marketa Ciharova , Pim Cuijpers , Yagmur Amanvermez , Heleen Riper , Anke M. Klein , Felix Bolinski , Leonore M. de Wit , Claudia M. van der Heijde , Ronny Bruffaerts , Sascha Struijs , Reinout W. Wiers , Eirini Karyotaki
{"title":"Use of tailoring features and reasons for dropout in a guided internet-based transdiagnostic individually-tailored cognitive behavioral therapy for symptoms of depression and/or anxiety in college students","authors":"Marketa Ciharova ,&nbsp;Pim Cuijpers ,&nbsp;Yagmur Amanvermez ,&nbsp;Heleen Riper ,&nbsp;Anke M. Klein ,&nbsp;Felix Bolinski ,&nbsp;Leonore M. de Wit ,&nbsp;Claudia M. van der Heijde ,&nbsp;Ronny Bruffaerts ,&nbsp;Sascha Struijs ,&nbsp;Reinout W. Wiers ,&nbsp;Eirini Karyotaki","doi":"10.1016/j.invent.2023.100646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transdiagnostic individually-tailored digital interventions reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults with moderate effects. However, research into these approaches for college students is scarce and contradicting. In addition, the exact reasons for intervention dropout in this target group are not well known, and the use of individually-tailored intervention features, such as optional modules, has not yet been explored. The current study aimed to (1) investigate reasons for dropout from a guided internet-based transdiagnostic individually-tailored intervention for college students assessed in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and (2) evaluate whether participants used tailoring features intended for their baseline symptoms. A sample of college students with mild to moderate depression and/or anxiety symptoms (<em>n</em> = 48) in the Netherlands (partially) followed a guided internet-based transdiagnostic individually-tailored intervention. We contacted those who did not complete the entire intervention (<em>n</em> = 29) by phone to report the reasons for intervention dropout. Further, we descriptively explored the use of tailoring features (i.e., depression versus anxiety trajectory) and optional modules of the intervention in the whole sample. We identified a range of person- and intervention-related reasons for intervention dropout, most commonly busy schedules, needs for different kinds of help, or absence of personal contact. Furthermore, only less than half of the participants used the individually-tailoring features to address the symptoms they reported as predominant. In conclusion, digital interventions clear about the content and targeted symptoms, tested in user research could prevent dropout and create reasonable expectations of the intervention. Participants would benefit from additional guidance when using tailoring features of digital interventions, as they often do not choose the tailoring features targeting their baseline symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48615,"journal":{"name":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100646"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782923000465/pdfft?md5=a4408314f5e65d085240859f2099c0e3&pid=1-s2.0-S2214782923000465-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782923000465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transdiagnostic individually-tailored digital interventions reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults with moderate effects. However, research into these approaches for college students is scarce and contradicting. In addition, the exact reasons for intervention dropout in this target group are not well known, and the use of individually-tailored intervention features, such as optional modules, has not yet been explored. The current study aimed to (1) investigate reasons for dropout from a guided internet-based transdiagnostic individually-tailored intervention for college students assessed in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and (2) evaluate whether participants used tailoring features intended for their baseline symptoms. A sample of college students with mild to moderate depression and/or anxiety symptoms (n = 48) in the Netherlands (partially) followed a guided internet-based transdiagnostic individually-tailored intervention. We contacted those who did not complete the entire intervention (n = 29) by phone to report the reasons for intervention dropout. Further, we descriptively explored the use of tailoring features (i.e., depression versus anxiety trajectory) and optional modules of the intervention in the whole sample. We identified a range of person- and intervention-related reasons for intervention dropout, most commonly busy schedules, needs for different kinds of help, or absence of personal contact. Furthermore, only less than half of the participants used the individually-tailoring features to address the symptoms they reported as predominant. In conclusion, digital interventions clear about the content and targeted symptoms, tested in user research could prevent dropout and create reasonable expectations of the intervention. Participants would benefit from additional guidance when using tailoring features of digital interventions, as they often do not choose the tailoring features targeting their baseline symptoms.

在一项针对大学生抑郁和/或焦虑症状的指导性基于互联网的跨诊断个体定制认知行为疗法中,定制特征和辍学原因的使用
跨诊断个性化定制数字干预措施可减轻成人抑郁和焦虑症状,效果中等。然而,针对大学生的这些方法的研究很少,而且相互矛盾。此外,该目标群体干预退出的确切原因尚不清楚,使用个性化的干预功能,如可选模块,尚未进行探索。目前的研究旨在(1)调查在随机对照试验(RCT)中对大学生进行的基于互联网的定向跨诊断个性化干预退出的原因,(2)评估参与者是否使用了针对其基线症状的定制特征。荷兰(部分)有轻度至中度抑郁和/或焦虑症状的大学生样本(n = 48)遵循了基于互联网的定向跨诊断个性化干预。我们通过电话联系那些没有完成整个干预的人(n = 29),报告干预退出的原因。此外,我们描述性地探讨了在整个样本中使用裁剪特征(即抑郁与焦虑轨迹)和干预的可选模块。我们确定了一系列与个人和干预相关的原因,最常见的是繁忙的日程安排,需要不同种类的帮助,或缺乏个人联系。此外,只有不到一半的参与者使用个性化定制功能来解决他们报告的主要症状。总之,明确了内容和目标症状的数字干预措施,在用户研究中进行了测试,可以防止辍学,并产生对干预措施的合理期望。参与者在使用数字干预措施的定制功能时将受益于额外的指导,因为他们通常不会选择针对其基线症状的定制功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
9.30%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ESRII) and the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ISRII). The aim of Internet Interventions is to publish scientific, peer-reviewed, high-impact research on Internet interventions and related areas. Internet Interventions welcomes papers on the following subjects: • Intervention studies targeting the promotion of mental health and featuring the Internet and/or technologies using the Internet as an underlying technology, e.g. computers, smartphone devices, tablets, sensors • Implementation and dissemination of Internet interventions • Integration of Internet interventions into existing systems of care • Descriptions of development and deployment infrastructures • Internet intervention methodology and theory papers • Internet-based epidemiology • Descriptions of new Internet-based technologies and experiments with clinical applications • Economics of internet interventions (cost-effectiveness) • Health care policy and Internet interventions • The role of culture in Internet intervention • Internet psychometrics • Ethical issues pertaining to Internet interventions and measurements • Human-computer interaction and usability research with clinical implications • Systematic reviews and meta-analysis on Internet interventions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信