AI Ethics Principles in Practice: Perspectives of Designers and Developers

Conrad Sanderson;David Douglas;Qinghua Lu;Emma Schleiger;Jon Whittle;Justine Lacey;Glenn Newnham;Stefan Hajkowicz;Cathy Robinson;David Hansen
{"title":"AI Ethics Principles in Practice: Perspectives of Designers and Developers","authors":"Conrad Sanderson;David Douglas;Qinghua Lu;Emma Schleiger;Jon Whittle;Justine Lacey;Glenn Newnham;Stefan Hajkowicz;Cathy Robinson;David Hansen","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2023.3257303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As consensus across the various published AI ethics principles is approached, a gap remains between high-level principles and practical techniques that can be readily adopted to design and develop responsible AI systems. We examine the practices and experiences of researchers and engineers from Australia’s national scientific research agency (CSIRO), who are involved in designing and developing AI systems for many application areas. Semi-structured interviews were used to examine how the practices of the participants relate to and align with a set of high-level AI ethics principles proposed by the Australian Government. The principles comprise: (1) privacy protection and security, (2) reliability and safety, (3) transparency and explainability, (4) fairness, (5) contestability, (6) accountability, (7) human-centred values, (8) human, social and environmental well-being. Discussions on the gained insights from the interviews include various tensions and trade-offs between the principles, and provide suggestions for implementing each high-level principle. We also present suggestions aiming to enhance associated support mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"4 2","pages":"171-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10071542/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

As consensus across the various published AI ethics principles is approached, a gap remains between high-level principles and practical techniques that can be readily adopted to design and develop responsible AI systems. We examine the practices and experiences of researchers and engineers from Australia’s national scientific research agency (CSIRO), who are involved in designing and developing AI systems for many application areas. Semi-structured interviews were used to examine how the practices of the participants relate to and align with a set of high-level AI ethics principles proposed by the Australian Government. The principles comprise: (1) privacy protection and security, (2) reliability and safety, (3) transparency and explainability, (4) fairness, (5) contestability, (6) accountability, (7) human-centred values, (8) human, social and environmental well-being. Discussions on the gained insights from the interviews include various tensions and trade-offs between the principles, and provide suggestions for implementing each high-level principle. We also present suggestions aiming to enhance associated support mechanisms.
实践中的人工智能伦理原则:设计者和开发者的视角
随着各种已发表的人工智能伦理原则达成共识,高层次原则与可用于设计和开发负责任的人工智能系统的实用技术之间仍然存在差距。我们研究了澳大利亚国家科学研究机构(CSIRO)的研究人员和工程师的实践和经验,他们参与了许多应用领域的人工智能系统的设计和开发。使用半结构化访谈来检查参与者的实践如何与澳大利亚政府提出的一套高级人工智能伦理原则相关联并保持一致。这些原则包括:(1)隐私保护和安全;(2)可靠性和安全性;(3)透明度和可解释性;(4)公平性;(5)可竞争性;(6)问责制;(7)以人为本的价值观;(8)人类、社会和环境的福祉。讨论从访谈中获得的见解,包括原则之间的各种紧张关系和权衡,并提供实施每个高级原则的建议。我们还提出了旨在加强相关支持机制的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信