Routine Chest Radiography Following Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter: Use and Clinical Outcomes

Q3 Medicine
Mouafak Homsi, I. Hashim, C. Hmedeh, B. Karam, J. Hoballah, F. Haddad
{"title":"Routine Chest Radiography Following Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter: Use and Clinical Outcomes","authors":"Mouafak Homsi, I. Hashim, C. Hmedeh, B. Karam, J. Hoballah, F. Haddad","doi":"10.2309/java-d-21-00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \n \n Background: A postoperative chest x-ray (CXR) remains part of some hospital protocols following tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement despite the use of operative imaging-guided techniques. The aim is to assess the usefulness of this practice and its impact on clinical outcomes and resource use.\n Methods: A review of medical records and postoperative CXR was done for 78 adult patients who had tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed in the operating room under fluoroscopy guidance. Catheters were inserted by ultrasound-guided puncture (51.3%) or exchanged from an existing catheter over a guide wire (48.7%). The postoperative CXRs were also examined by an independent reviewer to assess the catheter tip position and the need for repositioning to mimic a real-life postoperative setting. Procedural, nursing, and billing records were also reviewed.\n Results: No patients had a pneumothorax or major complications. On postoperative CXRs, 29 (37.2%) patients had the catheter tips in the right atrium, 23 (29.5%) in the cavoatrial junction, 25 (23.1%) in the superior vena cava, and 1 (1.3%) in the brachiocephalic vein. The independent reviewer found the catheter tips in acceptable anatomical positions in 75 of 78 patients. Only 3 (3.9%) patients had catheter malfunctions during dialysis and exchanged their catheters (2 had high catheters in the superior vena cava and brachiocephalic vein, 1 had a kinked catheter). Postoperative CXRs also caused delays in patient discharge from postanesthesia care units and significant increases in medical expenses (around $199 per patient).\n Conclusion: Routine CXR after tunneled hemodialysis central venous catheter insertion is unnecessary and does not add to the procedure's safety or to the patient's outcome.\n","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-21-00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A postoperative chest x-ray (CXR) remains part of some hospital protocols following tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement despite the use of operative imaging-guided techniques. The aim is to assess the usefulness of this practice and its impact on clinical outcomes and resource use. Methods: A review of medical records and postoperative CXR was done for 78 adult patients who had tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed in the operating room under fluoroscopy guidance. Catheters were inserted by ultrasound-guided puncture (51.3%) or exchanged from an existing catheter over a guide wire (48.7%). The postoperative CXRs were also examined by an independent reviewer to assess the catheter tip position and the need for repositioning to mimic a real-life postoperative setting. Procedural, nursing, and billing records were also reviewed. Results: No patients had a pneumothorax or major complications. On postoperative CXRs, 29 (37.2%) patients had the catheter tips in the right atrium, 23 (29.5%) in the cavoatrial junction, 25 (23.1%) in the superior vena cava, and 1 (1.3%) in the brachiocephalic vein. The independent reviewer found the catheter tips in acceptable anatomical positions in 75 of 78 patients. Only 3 (3.9%) patients had catheter malfunctions during dialysis and exchanged their catheters (2 had high catheters in the superior vena cava and brachiocephalic vein, 1 had a kinked catheter). Postoperative CXRs also caused delays in patient discharge from postanesthesia care units and significant increases in medical expenses (around $199 per patient). Conclusion: Routine CXR after tunneled hemodialysis central venous catheter insertion is unnecessary and does not add to the procedure's safety or to the patient's outcome.
隧道式血液透析导管后的常规胸部X线摄影:应用和临床结果
背景:尽管使用了手术成像引导技术,但在隧道式血液透析导管放置后,术后胸部x光检查(CXR)仍然是一些医院方案的一部分。目的是评估这种做法的有用性及其对临床结果和资源使用的影响。方法:对78例在荧光镜引导下将血液透析导管置入手术室的成年患者的病历和术后CXR进行回顾性分析。通过超声引导穿刺插入导管(51.3%)或通过导丝从现有导管更换导管(48.7%)。独立审查人员还检查了术后CXR,以评估导管尖端位置以及是否需要重新定位以模拟真实的术后环境。还审查了手术、护理和账单记录。结果:无一例患者出现严重并发症。在术后CXR中,29名(37.2%)患者的导管尖端位于右心房,23名(29.5%)位于腔静脉交界处,25名(23.1%)位于上腔静脉,1名(1.3%)位于头臂静脉。独立审查者发现78名患者中有75名患者的导管尖端处于可接受的解剖位置。只有3名(3.9%)患者在透析过程中出现导管故障并更换了导管(2名患者上腔静脉和头臂静脉导管高,1名患者导管扭结)。术后CXR还导致患者延迟从麻醉后护理室出院,并显著增加医疗费用(每位患者约199美元)。结论:隧道式血液透析中心静脉导管插入后常规CXR是不必要的,并且不会增加手术的安全性或患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信