Selección y breve comentario a alguna jurisprudencia relevante en la práctica forense de México sobre aspectos sustanciales, procesales y/o probatorios de la acción de prescripción adquisitiva o usucapión de buena fe (notas histórico comparativas)

Q4 Social Sciences
Fernando Marcín Balsa
{"title":"Selección y breve comentario a alguna jurisprudencia relevante en la práctica forense de México sobre aspectos sustanciales, procesales y/o probatorios de la acción de prescripción adquisitiva o usucapión de buena fe (notas histórico comparativas)","authors":"Fernando Marcín Balsa","doi":"10.22201/IIJ.24487902E.2020.17.16216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with a brief compendium of relevant Mexican court precedence on the occasion of the Civil law legal fiction so-called Positive prescription, that is, operating with an element of bona fide, which is also known as usucapionis. Contrasting the binding interpretation of the judiciary (which it must be applied by the bar and it obliges observance from the legal practitioner) with the historical and juridical literature available in the sources of the roman law.","PeriodicalId":36265,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","volume":"1 1","pages":"29-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIJ.24487902E.2020.17.16216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper deals with a brief compendium of relevant Mexican court precedence on the occasion of the Civil law legal fiction so-called Positive prescription, that is, operating with an element of bona fide, which is also known as usucapionis. Contrasting the binding interpretation of the judiciary (which it must be applied by the bar and it obliges observance from the legal practitioner) with the historical and juridical literature available in the sources of the roman law.
对墨西哥司法实践中有关购买时效或善意用益权诉讼的实质性、程序和/或证据方面的一些相关判例法的选择和简要评论(比较历史注释)
本文简要概述了墨西哥法院在民法法律虚构中所谓的积极时效的相关判例,即在善意要素的基础上运作,这也被称为通常适用。将司法机构具有约束力的解释(必须由律师事务所适用,并要求法律从业人员遵守)与罗马法渊源中的历史和司法文献进行对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信