Study on Potential Role and Benefits of Liquified Natural Gas Import Terminal in Latvia

IF 0.5 Q4 PHYSICS, APPLIED
A. Ansone, L. Jansons, I. Bode, E. Dzelzītis, L. Zemite, A. Broks
{"title":"Study on Potential Role and Benefits of Liquified Natural Gas Import Terminal in Latvia","authors":"A. Ansone, L. Jansons, I. Bode, E. Dzelzītis, L. Zemite, A. Broks","doi":"10.2478/lpts-2022-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Natural gas is relatively clean energy source, which emits less greenhouse gases (hereinafter – GHG), compared to other fossil fuels, such as hard and brown coal, and therefore it may be the most feasible resource to ensure smooth energy transition towards Europe’s climate neutrality by 2050. Traditional natural gas can be easily transported and used in liquefied (hereinafter – LNG) or compressed form. As for biomethane, in future it also can be used in liquefied (hereinafter – bioLNG) and compressed form, as well as transported by means of the current natural gas infrastructure. It can also significantly enhance regional and national energy security and independence, which has been challenging for the European Union (hereinafter – EU) over at least several decades. Issue on energy independence, security of supply, alternative natural gas sources has been in a hotspot of the Baltic energy policy makers as well. Now, considering Russia’s invasion in Ukraine, since late February 2022, a problem of the EU natural gas dependency on the Russian Federation has escalated again and with force never before experienced. The European natural gas prices also hit records, as the natural gas prices in the Netherlands Title Transfer Facility reached 345 euros per megawatt-hour (hereinafter – EUR/MWh) in March 2022. Therefore, LNG import terminal is the only viable option to reduce national dependency of the so-called pipe gas which in some cases, due to the insufficient interconnections, may be delivered from very limited number of sources. The European policy makers and relevant institutions are currently working towards radical EU natural gas supply diversification, where LNG deliveries coming from outside of Russia will certainly take a central stage. In case of Latvia, the potential benefits of the LNG terminal development in Skulte were evaluated in order to reduce energy independence of the Russian natural gas deliveries in the Baltic region and to introduce new ways and sources of the natural gas flows to the Baltics. LNG terminal in Skulte could ensure significant capital investment cost reduction comparing to other projects proposed for Latvia in different periods, due to already existing natural gas transmission infrastructure and the relative closeness to the Incukalns underground gas storage (hereinafter – UGS). Various aspects, such as technical, political and economic ones, were analysed to assure that Skulte LNG terminal would be a real asset not only to customers of Latvia, but also to those of the whole Baltic region, where in future it would be possible to use biomethane for efficient utilisation of existing and developing natural gas infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":43603,"journal":{"name":"Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences","volume":"59 1","pages":"37 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2022-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Natural gas is relatively clean energy source, which emits less greenhouse gases (hereinafter – GHG), compared to other fossil fuels, such as hard and brown coal, and therefore it may be the most feasible resource to ensure smooth energy transition towards Europe’s climate neutrality by 2050. Traditional natural gas can be easily transported and used in liquefied (hereinafter – LNG) or compressed form. As for biomethane, in future it also can be used in liquefied (hereinafter – bioLNG) and compressed form, as well as transported by means of the current natural gas infrastructure. It can also significantly enhance regional and national energy security and independence, which has been challenging for the European Union (hereinafter – EU) over at least several decades. Issue on energy independence, security of supply, alternative natural gas sources has been in a hotspot of the Baltic energy policy makers as well. Now, considering Russia’s invasion in Ukraine, since late February 2022, a problem of the EU natural gas dependency on the Russian Federation has escalated again and with force never before experienced. The European natural gas prices also hit records, as the natural gas prices in the Netherlands Title Transfer Facility reached 345 euros per megawatt-hour (hereinafter – EUR/MWh) in March 2022. Therefore, LNG import terminal is the only viable option to reduce national dependency of the so-called pipe gas which in some cases, due to the insufficient interconnections, may be delivered from very limited number of sources. The European policy makers and relevant institutions are currently working towards radical EU natural gas supply diversification, where LNG deliveries coming from outside of Russia will certainly take a central stage. In case of Latvia, the potential benefits of the LNG terminal development in Skulte were evaluated in order to reduce energy independence of the Russian natural gas deliveries in the Baltic region and to introduce new ways and sources of the natural gas flows to the Baltics. LNG terminal in Skulte could ensure significant capital investment cost reduction comparing to other projects proposed for Latvia in different periods, due to already existing natural gas transmission infrastructure and the relative closeness to the Incukalns underground gas storage (hereinafter – UGS). Various aspects, such as technical, political and economic ones, were analysed to assure that Skulte LNG terminal would be a real asset not only to customers of Latvia, but also to those of the whole Baltic region, where in future it would be possible to use biomethane for efficient utilisation of existing and developing natural gas infrastructure.
拉脱维亚液化天然气进口终端的潜在作用和效益研究
摘要天然气是一种相对清洁的能源,与其他化石燃料(如硬煤和褐煤)相比,它排放的温室气体(以下简称GHG)更少,因此它可能是确保到2050年能源平稳过渡到欧洲气候中和的最可行资源。传统的天然气可以很容易地以液化(以下简称LNG)或压缩的形式运输和使用。至于生物甲烷气,未来也可以以液化(下面简称bioLNG)和压缩的形式使用,以及通过现有的天然气基础设施运输。它还可以显著增强地区和国家能源安全和独立性,这对欧盟(以下简称欧盟)来说是至少几十年来的挑战。能源独立性、供应安全、替代天然气来源等问题也一直是波罗的海能源政策制定者关注的热点。现在,考虑到俄罗斯入侵乌克兰,自2022年2月下旬以来,欧盟对俄罗斯联邦的天然气依赖问题再次升级,而且使用了前所未有的武力。欧洲天然气价格也创下历史新高,荷兰产权转让设施的天然气价格在2022年3月达到每兆瓦时345欧元(以下简称欧元/兆瓦时)。因此,液化天然气进口码头是减少国家对所谓管道天然气依赖的唯一可行选择,在某些情况下,由于互连不足,管道天然气可能从数量非常有限的来源输送。欧洲政策制定者和相关机构目前正在努力实现欧盟天然气供应的彻底多样化,来自俄罗斯以外的液化天然气输送肯定将占据核心地位。以拉脱维亚为例,评估了斯库尔特液化天然气接收站开发的潜在效益,以降低俄罗斯在波罗的海地区天然气输送的能源独立性,并引入新的天然气流向波罗的海的方式和来源。与拉脱维亚不同时期拟议的其他项目相比,斯库尔特的液化天然气接收站可以确保大幅降低资本投资成本,因为现有的天然气输送基础设施以及与Incukalns地下储气库(以下简称UGS)的相对接近。对技术、政治和经济等各个方面进行了分析,以确保Skulte液化天然气接收站不仅对拉脱维亚的客户,而且对整个波罗的海地区的客户来说都是一笔真正的资产,在未来,该地区将有可能使用生物甲烷气来有效利用现有和发展中的天然气基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
41
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences (Latvijas Fizikas un Tehnisko Zinātņu Žurnāls) publishes experimental and theoretical papers containing results not published previously and review articles. Its scope includes Energy and Power, Energy Engineering, Energy Policy and Economics, Physical Sciences, Physics and Applied Physics in Engineering, Astronomy and Spectroscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信