Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Experience in a Tertiary Level Hospital in Bangladesh

M. Hasan, Nelson Taposh Mondal, Mahbub Hossain, I. Perveen
{"title":"Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Experience in a Tertiary Level Hospital in Bangladesh","authors":"M. Hasan, Nelson Taposh Mondal, Mahbub Hossain, I. Perveen","doi":"10.3329/JEMC.V9I1.39898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was first described as a diagnostic technique, now-a-days we mainly do ERCP with a therapeutic intent for management of various biliary and pancreatic diseases. \nObjectives: This study intends to find out the diagnosis obtained by ERCP procedure and the therapeutic interventions done for appropriate cases in a tertiary level hospital in Bangladesh. \nMaterials and Methods: This prospective observational study was performed in the Department of Gastroenterology in Enam Medical College & Hospital over a period from June 2014 to October 2016. Eighty patients, aged 15–70 years, were selected only for therapeutic ERCP. They were diagnosed and selected after taking history, physical examination and appropriate investigations. ERCP was done under short-term general anesthesia or deep sedation by using propofol or fentanyl. Results are shown in tables. \nResults: Majority of the cases were choledocholithiasis (53.75%) followed by cholangiocarcinoma (11.25%), ampullary carcinoma (8.75%), carcinoma of the gall bladder (6.25%), biliary ascariasis (6.25%), biliary stricture (5%), papillary stenosis (5%), chronic pancreatitis (2.5%) and sludge in the CBD (1.25%). Types of therapeutic intervention depended on diagnosis. Papillotomy with stone removal was done in patients with choledocholithiasis. Papillotomy with stenting was done in the patients with cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary carcinoma, gall bladder carcinoma, biliary stricture and paillary stenosis. Papillotomy with worm extraction was done in cases of biliary ascariasis. Papillotomy with clearing of sludge was done for sludge in the CBD and only papillotomy was done in two patients of chronic pancreatitis. \nConclusion: In this study we found that choledocholithiasis and biliary tract malignancy were the two major ERCP findings. Therapeutic interventions were done according to diagnosis. The most common therapeutic intervention was papillotomy with stone removal. Next common intervention was papillotomy with stenting. \nJ Enam Med Col 2019; 9(1): 9-15","PeriodicalId":30472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enam Medical College","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/JEMC.V9I1.39898","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enam Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/JEMC.V9I1.39898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was first described as a diagnostic technique, now-a-days we mainly do ERCP with a therapeutic intent for management of various biliary and pancreatic diseases. Objectives: This study intends to find out the diagnosis obtained by ERCP procedure and the therapeutic interventions done for appropriate cases in a tertiary level hospital in Bangladesh. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was performed in the Department of Gastroenterology in Enam Medical College & Hospital over a period from June 2014 to October 2016. Eighty patients, aged 15–70 years, were selected only for therapeutic ERCP. They were diagnosed and selected after taking history, physical examination and appropriate investigations. ERCP was done under short-term general anesthesia or deep sedation by using propofol or fentanyl. Results are shown in tables. Results: Majority of the cases were choledocholithiasis (53.75%) followed by cholangiocarcinoma (11.25%), ampullary carcinoma (8.75%), carcinoma of the gall bladder (6.25%), biliary ascariasis (6.25%), biliary stricture (5%), papillary stenosis (5%), chronic pancreatitis (2.5%) and sludge in the CBD (1.25%). Types of therapeutic intervention depended on diagnosis. Papillotomy with stone removal was done in patients with choledocholithiasis. Papillotomy with stenting was done in the patients with cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary carcinoma, gall bladder carcinoma, biliary stricture and paillary stenosis. Papillotomy with worm extraction was done in cases of biliary ascariasis. Papillotomy with clearing of sludge was done for sludge in the CBD and only papillotomy was done in two patients of chronic pancreatitis. Conclusion: In this study we found that choledocholithiasis and biliary tract malignancy were the two major ERCP findings. Therapeutic interventions were done according to diagnosis. The most common therapeutic intervention was papillotomy with stone removal. Next common intervention was papillotomy with stenting. J Enam Med Col 2019; 9(1): 9-15
内窥镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)在孟加拉国一家三级医院的经验
背景:尽管内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)最初被描述为一种诊断技术,但现在我们主要以治疗各种胆胰疾病为目的进行ERCP。目的:本研究旨在了解孟加拉国一家三级医院通过ERCP程序获得的诊断和对适当病例的治疗干预。材料和方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究于2014年6月至2016年10月在搪瓷医学院和医院消化内科进行。80名患者,年龄在15-70岁之间,仅被选择用于治疗性ERCP。他们是在病史、体格检查和适当调查后被诊断和选择的。ERCP是在短期全麻或深度镇静下使用丙泊酚或芬太尼进行的。结果如表所示。结果:大多数病例为胆总管结石(53.75%),其次为胆管癌(11.25%)、壶腹癌(8.75%)、胆囊癌(6.25%)、胆道蛔虫症(6.25%)、胆管狭窄(5%)、乳头状狭窄(5%),慢性胰腺炎(2.5%)和CBD淤泥(1.25%)。治疗干预类型取决于诊断。胆总管结石患者行乳头切开取石术。对胆管癌、壶腹癌、胆囊癌、胆道狭窄和壶腹狭窄患者行乳头状瘤切开术并支架置入术。乳头切开取虫术治疗胆道蛔虫症。对CBD中的污泥进行了乳头切开术并清除污泥,对两名慢性胰腺炎患者仅进行了乳头切除术。结论:在本研究中,我们发现胆总管结石和胆道恶性肿瘤是ERCP的两个主要发现。根据诊断进行治疗干预。最常见的治疗干预措施是乳头状瘤切开取石。下一个常见的干预措施是乳头状瘤切开术和支架置入术。搪瓷医学杂志2019;9(1):9-15
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信