Contemporary Warfare Discourse in Russia’s Military Thought

Q4 Social Sciences
Algirdas Revaitis
{"title":"Contemporary Warfare Discourse in Russia’s Military Thought","authors":"Algirdas Revaitis","doi":"10.2478/lasr-2018-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article analyses the Russian concept of contemporary warfare after the 2008 Russia-Georgia war and the changes that have occurred in the wake of the 2014 military conflict in Eastern Ukraine. This concept is shaped through a dissection of public texts and speeches by Russian military officers, experts and analysts. The article attempts to measure the impact of Russia’s military practice in Eastern Ukraine in its stance on contemporary warfare and see what new types of warfare (terminologically speaking) are appearing in Russia’s military vocabulary. A vision of the future of types of Russian war is presented, complete with arguments regarding the most plausible case of future local war with respect to Russia. The article furthermore provides a detailed analysis of the interpretations of asymmetrical, network-centric, hybrid warfare, colour revolutions, controlled chaos, and information and electromagnetic warfare in Russia’s military thought, which is understood as forms of realisation of contemporary warfare. A quest for the origin of these warfare ideas shows that Russia tends to emulate the military experience of western powers, the US in particular, instead of doing the opposite and acting adaptively and conceptualising its most recent military experience as a vision of modern warfare.","PeriodicalId":37780,"journal":{"name":"Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review","volume":"16 1","pages":"269 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/lasr-2018-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article analyses the Russian concept of contemporary warfare after the 2008 Russia-Georgia war and the changes that have occurred in the wake of the 2014 military conflict in Eastern Ukraine. This concept is shaped through a dissection of public texts and speeches by Russian military officers, experts and analysts. The article attempts to measure the impact of Russia’s military practice in Eastern Ukraine in its stance on contemporary warfare and see what new types of warfare (terminologically speaking) are appearing in Russia’s military vocabulary. A vision of the future of types of Russian war is presented, complete with arguments regarding the most plausible case of future local war with respect to Russia. The article furthermore provides a detailed analysis of the interpretations of asymmetrical, network-centric, hybrid warfare, colour revolutions, controlled chaos, and information and electromagnetic warfare in Russia’s military thought, which is understood as forms of realisation of contemporary warfare. A quest for the origin of these warfare ideas shows that Russia tends to emulate the military experience of western powers, the US in particular, instead of doing the opposite and acting adaptively and conceptualising its most recent military experience as a vision of modern warfare.
俄罗斯军事思想中的当代战争话语
本文分析了2008年俄罗斯-格鲁吉亚战争后俄罗斯的当代战争理念,以及2014年乌克兰东部军事冲突后俄罗斯的当代战争理念发生的变化。这一概念是通过对俄罗斯军官、专家和分析师的公开文本和演讲的剖析而形成的。本文试图衡量俄罗斯在乌克兰东部的军事实践对当代战争的影响,并看看俄罗斯军事词汇中出现了哪些新的战争类型(术语上)。对俄罗斯未来战争类型的展望,以及对俄罗斯未来局部战争最可能的情况的论证。文章进一步详细分析了俄罗斯军事思想中对不对称、网络中心、混合战争、颜色革命、控制混乱以及信息和电磁战的解释,这些被理解为当代战争的实现形式。对这些战争思想起源的探索表明,俄罗斯倾向于模仿西方大国(尤其是美国)的军事经验,而不是相反,采取适应性行动,并将其最近的军事经验概念化为现代战争的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review
Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review is a bilingual (Lithuanian and English), peer reviewed scholarly magazine that is published once per year by the Strategic Research Center of the Military Academy of Lithuania in cooperation with Vilnius University (Institute of International Relations and Political Science) and Vytautas Magnus University in Kaunas (Political Science and Diplomacy Department). The journal focuses on the global, regional and national security problematique which directly or indirectly influence security and defense issues of Lithuania, the Baltic states and region around. The Review aims to sustain high profile scientific publications delivering rigorous analytical insights into security and defence problematique ofn the region and to be ranked as a regular and high-quality academic periodical. The Review reaches out for academic community and political practitioners and offer ample opportunities for scholarly visibility and potential impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信