Trans Exploits: Trans of Color Cultures and Technologies in Movement

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Q. Ngo
{"title":"Trans Exploits: Trans of Color Cultures and Technologies in Movement","authors":"Q. Ngo","doi":"10.1080/07491409.2022.2041965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"explains stereotype as a visual concept as well as the historical inheritance of stereotyping in comics. Several well-chosen examples of El Rassi’s use of Arab stereotypes for purposes of subversion illustrate Køhlert’s analysis, including one in which El Rassi has placed his own headshot within a newspaper page filled with 9/11 terrorists, asking, “Could the average American distinguish me from a Muslim terrorist?” (Figure 5.7). Some readers may resist Køhlert’s more psychoanalytic analysis of the work of Phoebe Gloeckner. Gloeckner’s A Child’s Life and The Diary of a Teenage Girl have received a fair amount of scholarly attention previously, including an analysis in Chute’s Graphic Women, of which Køhlert states, “[Chute’s] reading stops short of fully exploring the resonance between comics form and theoretical work on the representation and working through of trauma” (p. 56). I found Køhlert’s subsequent attempt to do so less convincing than Chute’s, which focuses on Gloeckner’s representations of female bodies and the agency of her own female body, rather than on the scenes of abuse that are Køhlert’s focus (even as some of the same images are discussed by both). Køhlert wants to prove that the autobiographical comics form is uniquely well suited to negotiate individual experiences of embodiment. At times, he sets text narratives, photography, and even motion pictures against autobiographical comics as less able to convey the intimacies and instabilities of embodied experience, a claim that many media scholars may find problematic. However, that argument should not invalidate the many insights into the analyses of the individual works presented. The affordances of the comics form—the ability to shift and juxtapose temporalities, the combination of image and word, the intimacy of being hand drawn—are all compelling reasons for readers and scholars to engage further with its genres. Accessible both to those with a developed interest in comics and those newly curious, I hope Køhlert’s book succeeds in drawing more scholarly and pedagogical attention to these challenging and engaging works.","PeriodicalId":46136,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies in Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2022.2041965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

explains stereotype as a visual concept as well as the historical inheritance of stereotyping in comics. Several well-chosen examples of El Rassi’s use of Arab stereotypes for purposes of subversion illustrate Køhlert’s analysis, including one in which El Rassi has placed his own headshot within a newspaper page filled with 9/11 terrorists, asking, “Could the average American distinguish me from a Muslim terrorist?” (Figure 5.7). Some readers may resist Køhlert’s more psychoanalytic analysis of the work of Phoebe Gloeckner. Gloeckner’s A Child’s Life and The Diary of a Teenage Girl have received a fair amount of scholarly attention previously, including an analysis in Chute’s Graphic Women, of which Køhlert states, “[Chute’s] reading stops short of fully exploring the resonance between comics form and theoretical work on the representation and working through of trauma” (p. 56). I found Køhlert’s subsequent attempt to do so less convincing than Chute’s, which focuses on Gloeckner’s representations of female bodies and the agency of her own female body, rather than on the scenes of abuse that are Køhlert’s focus (even as some of the same images are discussed by both). Køhlert wants to prove that the autobiographical comics form is uniquely well suited to negotiate individual experiences of embodiment. At times, he sets text narratives, photography, and even motion pictures against autobiographical comics as less able to convey the intimacies and instabilities of embodied experience, a claim that many media scholars may find problematic. However, that argument should not invalidate the many insights into the analyses of the individual works presented. The affordances of the comics form—the ability to shift and juxtapose temporalities, the combination of image and word, the intimacy of being hand drawn—are all compelling reasons for readers and scholars to engage further with its genres. Accessible both to those with a developed interest in comics and those newly curious, I hope Køhlert’s book succeeds in drawing more scholarly and pedagogical attention to these challenging and engaging works.
跨功绩:运动中的跨色彩文化和技术
解释刻板印象作为一个视觉概念,以及刻板印象在漫画中的历史传承。几个精心挑选的例子说明了El Rassi为了颠覆目的而使用阿拉伯人的刻板印象,其中一个例子是El Rassi把自己的头像放在满是9/11恐怖分子的报纸上,问道:“普通美国人能把我和穆斯林恐怖分子区分开来吗?”(图5.7)。一些读者可能会抵制Køhlert对Phoebe Gloeckner作品的精神分析。Gloeckner的《一个孩子的生活》和《一个少女的日记》之前已经得到了相当多的学术关注,包括在Chute的《图形女性》中的一篇分析,其中k约赫勒特说,“[Chute的]阅读没有充分探索漫画形式和关于创伤的表现和工作的理论工作之间的共鸣”(第56页)。我发现k约赫勒特随后的尝试不如Chute的作品令人信服,Chute的作品关注的是格莱克纳对女性身体和她自己女性身体的代理的表现,而不是k约赫勒特关注的虐待场景(尽管两人都讨论了一些相同的图像)。Køhlert想要证明自传体漫画的形式是独特的,非常适合于协商个体的化身体验。有时,他把文字叙事、摄影、甚至电影与自传体漫画对立起来,认为自传体漫画不太能够传达具体体验的亲密和不稳定,许多媒体学者可能会发现这种说法有问题。然而,这一论点不应使对所呈现的个别作品的分析的许多见解无效。漫画形式的优点——转换和并列时间的能力,图像和文字的结合,手绘的亲切感——都是读者和学者进一步研究其类型的有力理由。对于那些对漫画有兴趣的人和那些刚刚好奇的人来说,我希望Køhlert的书能够成功地吸引更多的学术和教学关注这些具有挑战性和吸引力的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信