{"title":"Scale-up rules for flocculation","authors":"Radek Šulc, Pavel Ditl","doi":"10.1016/j.minpro.2017.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present here a study of three baffled tanks, 0.15<!--> <!-->m, 0.20<!--> <!-->m and 0.30<!--> <span>m in inner diameter, agitated by Rushton turbine, with reference to scaling up the flocculation kinetics. A clay slurry was used as a model wastewater. The experiments were carried out at mixing intensity 40</span> <!-->W/m<sup>3</sup> and clay concentration 0.58<!--> <!-->g/L. The model wastewater was flocculated with the Sokoflok 16A organic flocculent (solution 0.1<!--> <!-->wt%) in the range of dimensionless flocculent dosage D<sub>F</sub><sup>⁎</sup> from 0.448 to 5.241<!--> <!-->mg/g. The flocs that formed were separated by means of sedimentation. The operational conditions were designed according to following proposed scale-up rules: i) P/V<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->const., ii) t<sub>F</sub><sup>⁎</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->N·t<sub>F</sub> <!-->=<!--> <!-->const., iii) D<sub>F</sub><sup>⁎</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->const. and iv) u<sub>sed</sub> <!-->=<!--> <span>const. Applying the proposed scale-up rules, the flocculation efficiency was found to be practically the same irrespective of vessel size and flocculation dosage. For the given flocculated system and process conditions, the maximum degree of turbidity removal Z</span><sub>e</sub><sup>⁎</sup><sub>max</sub> <!-->=<!--> <!-->96.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.6% was found for dimensionless flocculation time 1916<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5% and dimensionless flocculent dosage D<sub>F</sub><sup>⁎</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3.128<!--> <!-->mg/g<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8%, regardless of vessel size. The approach to scale-up proposed by Camp (1955) is discussed and criticized in the light of present-day mixing theory, and an explanation is offered of the shortcomings of this approach, and why it gives incorrect scale-up results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14022,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mineral Processing","volume":"167 ","pages":"Pages 79-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.minpro.2017.08.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mineral Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301751617301795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
We present here a study of three baffled tanks, 0.15 m, 0.20 m and 0.30 m in inner diameter, agitated by Rushton turbine, with reference to scaling up the flocculation kinetics. A clay slurry was used as a model wastewater. The experiments were carried out at mixing intensity 40 W/m3 and clay concentration 0.58 g/L. The model wastewater was flocculated with the Sokoflok 16A organic flocculent (solution 0.1 wt%) in the range of dimensionless flocculent dosage DF⁎ from 0.448 to 5.241 mg/g. The flocs that formed were separated by means of sedimentation. The operational conditions were designed according to following proposed scale-up rules: i) P/V = const., ii) tF⁎ = N·tF = const., iii) DF⁎ = const. and iv) used = const. Applying the proposed scale-up rules, the flocculation efficiency was found to be practically the same irrespective of vessel size and flocculation dosage. For the given flocculated system and process conditions, the maximum degree of turbidity removal Ze⁎max = 96.1 ± 0.6% was found for dimensionless flocculation time 1916 ± 5% and dimensionless flocculent dosage DF⁎ = 3.128 mg/g ± 8%, regardless of vessel size. The approach to scale-up proposed by Camp (1955) is discussed and criticized in the light of present-day mixing theory, and an explanation is offered of the shortcomings of this approach, and why it gives incorrect scale-up results.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Mineral Processing has been discontinued as of the end of 2017, due to the merger with Minerals Engineering.
The International Journal of Mineral Processing covers aspects of the processing of mineral resources such as: Metallic and non-metallic ores, coals, and secondary resources. Topics dealt with include: Geometallurgy, comminution, sizing, classification (in air and water), gravity concentration, flotation, electric and magnetic separation, thickening, filtering, drying, and (bio)hydrometallurgy (when applied to low-grade raw materials), control and automation, waste treatment and disposal. In addition to research papers, the journal publishes review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor..