Classification Methods for EEG Patterns of Imaginary Movements

IF 1.9 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Nikolai Kapralov, Zh. V. Nagornova, N. Shemyakina
{"title":"Classification Methods for EEG Patterns of Imaginary Movements","authors":"Nikolai Kapralov, Zh. V. Nagornova, N. Shemyakina","doi":"10.15622/IA.2021.20.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The review focuses on the most promising methods for classifying EEG signals for non-invasive BCIs and theoretical approaches for the successful classification of EEG patterns. The paper provides an overview of articles using Riemannian geometry, deep learning methods and various options for preprocessing and \"clustering\" EEG signals, for example, common-spatial pattern (CSP). Among other approaches, pre-processing of EEG signals using CSP is often used, both offline and online. The combination of CSP, linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine and neural network (BPNN) made it possible to achieve 91% accuracy for binary classification with exoskeleton control as a feedback. There is very little work on the use of Riemannian geometry online and the best accuracy achieved so far for a binary classification problem is 69.3% in the work. At the same time, in offline testing, the average percentage of correct classification in the considered articles for approaches with CSP – 77.5 ± 5.8%, deep learning networks – 81.7 ± 4.7%, Riemannian geometry – 90.2 ± 6.6%. Due to nonlinear transformations, Riemannian geometry-based approaches and complex deep neural networks provide higher accuracy and better extract of useful information from raw EEG recordings rather than linear CSP transformation. However, in real-time setup, not only accuracy is important, but also a minimum time delay. Therefore, approaches using the CSP transformation and Riemannian geometry with a time delay of less than 500 ms may be in the future advantage.","PeriodicalId":42055,"journal":{"name":"Intelligenza Artificiale","volume":"20 1","pages":"94-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligenza Artificiale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15622/IA.2021.20.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The review focuses on the most promising methods for classifying EEG signals for non-invasive BCIs and theoretical approaches for the successful classification of EEG patterns. The paper provides an overview of articles using Riemannian geometry, deep learning methods and various options for preprocessing and "clustering" EEG signals, for example, common-spatial pattern (CSP). Among other approaches, pre-processing of EEG signals using CSP is often used, both offline and online. The combination of CSP, linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine and neural network (BPNN) made it possible to achieve 91% accuracy for binary classification with exoskeleton control as a feedback. There is very little work on the use of Riemannian geometry online and the best accuracy achieved so far for a binary classification problem is 69.3% in the work. At the same time, in offline testing, the average percentage of correct classification in the considered articles for approaches with CSP – 77.5 ± 5.8%, deep learning networks – 81.7 ± 4.7%, Riemannian geometry – 90.2 ± 6.6%. Due to nonlinear transformations, Riemannian geometry-based approaches and complex deep neural networks provide higher accuracy and better extract of useful information from raw EEG recordings rather than linear CSP transformation. However, in real-time setup, not only accuracy is important, but also a minimum time delay. Therefore, approaches using the CSP transformation and Riemannian geometry with a time delay of less than 500 ms may be in the future advantage.
想象运动脑电模式的分类方法
本文综述了无创脑机接口中最有前途的脑电信号分类方法和成功分类脑电模式的理论途径。本文概述了使用黎曼几何、深度学习方法和各种预处理和“聚类”EEG信号的选项的文章,例如,公共空间模式(CSP)。在其他方法中,经常使用CSP对EEG信号进行预处理,包括离线和在线。CSP、线性判别分析、支持向量机和神经网络(BPNN)的结合使得外骨骼控制作为反馈的二分类准确率达到91%。在网上使用黎曼几何的工作很少,到目前为止,对于一个二分类问题,工作中达到的最佳精度是69.3%。同时,在离线测试中,CSP方法的平均分类正确率为77.5±5.8%,深度学习网络方法为81.7±4.7%,黎曼几何方法为90.2±6.6%。由于非线性变换,与线性CSP变换相比,基于黎曼几何的方法和复杂的深度神经网络可以提供更高的精度和更好的从原始EEG记录中提取有用信息。然而,在实时设置中,不仅精度很重要,而且最小的时间延迟也很重要。因此,使用CSP变换和时间延迟小于500 ms的黎曼几何的方法可能在未来具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligenza Artificiale
Intelligenza Artificiale COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信