Developing information security metrics and measures for risk assessment of an organization

IF 1.2 Q2 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Prashant Manuja, R. Shekhawat
{"title":"Developing information security metrics and measures for risk assessment of an organization","authors":"Prashant Manuja, R. Shekhawat","doi":"10.1080/09720529.2022.2075092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The absence of public safety normalization bodies can antagonistically affect the reception of worldwide security guidelines and best practices. This research is done for the benefit of people, process and technology for any organization. This paper presents a novel pragmatic network protection evaluation structure that is custom-made to the ISO 2700x standard necessities for the improvement of Information Security Management System (ISMS). This model can be utilized for both self-appraisal and examining/scoring instruments by public network protection specialists. Utilizing this model, associations can consider their current data security the broad frameworks in contrast to nearby and global guidelines by using worked in pre-review instruments. All things considered, the model will assist associations with assessing and improving their status for developing dangers and dangers. In this system, an original numerical model was likewise planned and carried out for the scoring/rating instrument, specifically, the public digital protection list (aeNCI). The aeNCI utilizes various boundaries to decide the development of existing network safety programs at public associations and produce a classification and correlation reports. The outcomes empowered the partner to confirm the security configuration of their frameworks and recognize possible attacks/hazard vectors.","PeriodicalId":46563,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DISCRETE MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES & CRYPTOGRAPHY","volume":"25 1","pages":"1195 - 1202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DISCRETE MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES & CRYPTOGRAPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09720529.2022.2075092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The absence of public safety normalization bodies can antagonistically affect the reception of worldwide security guidelines and best practices. This research is done for the benefit of people, process and technology for any organization. This paper presents a novel pragmatic network protection evaluation structure that is custom-made to the ISO 2700x standard necessities for the improvement of Information Security Management System (ISMS). This model can be utilized for both self-appraisal and examining/scoring instruments by public network protection specialists. Utilizing this model, associations can consider their current data security the broad frameworks in contrast to nearby and global guidelines by using worked in pre-review instruments. All things considered, the model will assist associations with assessing and improving their status for developing dangers and dangers. In this system, an original numerical model was likewise planned and carried out for the scoring/rating instrument, specifically, the public digital protection list (aeNCI). The aeNCI utilizes various boundaries to decide the development of existing network safety programs at public associations and produce a classification and correlation reports. The outcomes empowered the partner to confirm the security configuration of their frameworks and recognize possible attacks/hazard vectors.
为组织的风险评估制定信息安全标准和措施
公共安全规范化机构的缺失会对全球安全准则和最佳实践的接受产生不利影响。这项研究是为了任何组织的人员、流程和技术的利益而进行的。本文根据ISO 2700x信息安全管理体系(ISMS)改进的标准要求,提出了一种新颖实用的网络保护评估结构。该模型可用于公共网络保护专家的自我评估和检查/评分工具。利用该模型,协会可以通过使用预先审查工具,将其当前的数据安全性考虑为与附近和全球指导方针相比的广泛框架。考虑到所有因素,该模型将有助于协会评估和改善其发展危险和危险的状况。在本系统中,同样为评分/评级工具,即公共数字保护清单(aeNCI),规划并执行了一个独创的数值模型。aeNCI利用各种界限决定公共协会现有网络安全计划的发展,并制作分类和相关报告。结果使合作伙伴能够确认其框架的安全配置并识别可能的攻击/危害向量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
21.40%
发文量
126
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信