Book Review: Engaging Place, Engaging Practices: Urban History and Campus-Community Partnerships by Bachin, Robin F. and Howard, Amy L. (eds)

IF 1.7 4区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Jay D. Gatrell
{"title":"Book Review: Engaging Place, Engaging Practices: Urban History and Campus-Community Partnerships by Bachin, Robin F. and Howard, Amy L. (eds)","authors":"Jay D. Gatrell","doi":"10.1177/08912424221148718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Civic engagement and community-based learning create new opportunities for higher education to enliven student learning, transform communities, and enhance our collective understanding of democracy in place and over time. To that end, Bachin and Howard (eds.) Engaging Place, Engaging Practices explores various examples of the engaged urban university and the practices deployed by faculty to promote civic engagement. The collection’s chapters demonstrate how public history, as well as action-oriented research, can be effective learning vehicles that simultaneously reconcile the past to chart new collaborative futures (Howard & Byrum), excavate local histories (Souther), and create grassroots projects to enhance access to and increase the visibility of local resources (Bachin). The collection also has an example of how neighborhood histories can be deployed to increase everyday understandings of climate change and assess local impacts on residents (Hurley). In each of these examples, the authors and their students leverage new technologies and spatial approaches (GIS and StoryMaps) to empower and inform communities. Finally, using role playing, Gudis (Chapter 6) enlivens local histories and provides students with a powerful performative lens through which to understand and explore social change in place. The book’s most ambitious example of the impact urban universities can make on communities is Chapter 2: Toward Creating the Democratic, Engage Urban University by Harkavy, Hodges, Puckett, and Weeks. Drawing on the experience of the University of Pennsylvania, the chapter explores the capacity of universities to promote social change through gentrification, indifference (neglect or disregard), partial engagement, and full engagement (p. 43)— and they provide examples of how the institution has engaged in practices over time that corresponds to all four categories. And, as the authors demonstrate, universities need not simply be agents of gentrification or engage in policies that promote benign neglect. Rather, higher education can and must foster community-based partnerships that seek to “transform” neighborhoods, improve schools, and advance teaching, learning, research, and service (p. 55). To that end, the authors describe the creation and evolution of a community-focused university center in 1992, now known as the Netter Center for Community Partnerships, which oversees academic engagement programs, as well as Penn’s university assistant schools’ initiative. In nearly all the chapters, the authors demonstrate that sustained collaboration and committed university leadership are essential to ensure that the potential and power of urban universities can be leveraged to promote positive change. Although the Penn example underscores what can be done when institutions commit to urban engagement, the other chapters demonstrate how instructors and individual courses can make a difference in the lives of students and residents. As such, the collection provides examples at a variety of scales—from the block, neighborhood, city, and regional school-of “...colleges and universities [striving] to matter” (p. 1). In doing so, the editors make the case that the engaged university can and should do more to shape “inclusive, equitable, and sustainable” communities—and that universities need to assume a heightened leadership role in a post-COVID-19 world (p. 189). Of course, in the case of several of the example institutions, it is worth recognizing that the financial resources available to many institutions—particularly urban public institutions—are more limited than the more well-heeled experiences of private institutions backed by billion or multibillion dollar endowments (Richmond, Pennsylvania, and Miami). For that reason, the scale and scope of community engagement will vary by institution type, mission, and geography. As an applied scholar and academic administrator who is committed to community-based learning, engaged scholarship, and public service that advances local economic development opportunities, strengthens local industries, and promotes collaborative comprehensive Book Review","PeriodicalId":47367,"journal":{"name":"Economic Development Quarterly","volume":"37 1","pages":"198 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Development Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424221148718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Civic engagement and community-based learning create new opportunities for higher education to enliven student learning, transform communities, and enhance our collective understanding of democracy in place and over time. To that end, Bachin and Howard (eds.) Engaging Place, Engaging Practices explores various examples of the engaged urban university and the practices deployed by faculty to promote civic engagement. The collection’s chapters demonstrate how public history, as well as action-oriented research, can be effective learning vehicles that simultaneously reconcile the past to chart new collaborative futures (Howard & Byrum), excavate local histories (Souther), and create grassroots projects to enhance access to and increase the visibility of local resources (Bachin). The collection also has an example of how neighborhood histories can be deployed to increase everyday understandings of climate change and assess local impacts on residents (Hurley). In each of these examples, the authors and their students leverage new technologies and spatial approaches (GIS and StoryMaps) to empower and inform communities. Finally, using role playing, Gudis (Chapter 6) enlivens local histories and provides students with a powerful performative lens through which to understand and explore social change in place. The book’s most ambitious example of the impact urban universities can make on communities is Chapter 2: Toward Creating the Democratic, Engage Urban University by Harkavy, Hodges, Puckett, and Weeks. Drawing on the experience of the University of Pennsylvania, the chapter explores the capacity of universities to promote social change through gentrification, indifference (neglect or disregard), partial engagement, and full engagement (p. 43)— and they provide examples of how the institution has engaged in practices over time that corresponds to all four categories. And, as the authors demonstrate, universities need not simply be agents of gentrification or engage in policies that promote benign neglect. Rather, higher education can and must foster community-based partnerships that seek to “transform” neighborhoods, improve schools, and advance teaching, learning, research, and service (p. 55). To that end, the authors describe the creation and evolution of a community-focused university center in 1992, now known as the Netter Center for Community Partnerships, which oversees academic engagement programs, as well as Penn’s university assistant schools’ initiative. In nearly all the chapters, the authors demonstrate that sustained collaboration and committed university leadership are essential to ensure that the potential and power of urban universities can be leveraged to promote positive change. Although the Penn example underscores what can be done when institutions commit to urban engagement, the other chapters demonstrate how instructors and individual courses can make a difference in the lives of students and residents. As such, the collection provides examples at a variety of scales—from the block, neighborhood, city, and regional school-of “...colleges and universities [striving] to matter” (p. 1). In doing so, the editors make the case that the engaged university can and should do more to shape “inclusive, equitable, and sustainable” communities—and that universities need to assume a heightened leadership role in a post-COVID-19 world (p. 189). Of course, in the case of several of the example institutions, it is worth recognizing that the financial resources available to many institutions—particularly urban public institutions—are more limited than the more well-heeled experiences of private institutions backed by billion or multibillion dollar endowments (Richmond, Pennsylvania, and Miami). For that reason, the scale and scope of community engagement will vary by institution type, mission, and geography. As an applied scholar and academic administrator who is committed to community-based learning, engaged scholarship, and public service that advances local economic development opportunities, strengthens local industries, and promotes collaborative comprehensive Book Review
书评:《参与的场所,参与的实践:城市历史与校园-社区合作》,罗宾·f·巴辛、霍华德、艾米·L.编
公民参与和以社区为基础的学习为高等教育创造了新的机会,以活跃学生的学习,改变社区,并增强我们对当地和长期民主的集体理解。为此,巴辛和霍华德(编著)参与的场所,参与的实践探索了城市大学参与的各种例子,以及教师为促进公民参与而部署的实践。该系列的章节展示了公共历史以及行动导向的研究如何成为有效的学习工具,同时调和过去,绘制新的合作未来(Howard & Byrum),挖掘当地历史(southern),并创建基层项目,以增加对当地资源的访问和可见度(Bachin)。该系列也有一个例子,说明如何利用社区历史来增加对气候变化的日常理解,并评估当地对居民的影响(Hurley)。在这些例子中,作者和他们的学生利用新技术和空间方法(GIS和StoryMaps)来授权和告知社区。最后,通过角色扮演,古迪斯(第六章)生动地呈现了当地的历史,并为学生提供了一个强大的表演镜头,通过它来理解和探索当地的社会变革。书中关于城市大学可以对社区产生影响的最雄心勃勃的例子是Harkavy, Hodges, Puckett和Weeks的第2章:迈向民主,参与城市大学。根据宾夕法尼亚大学的经验,本章探讨了大学通过士绅化、冷漠(忽视或漠视)、部分参与和全面参与来促进社会变革的能力(第43页),并提供了该机构如何在一段时间内从事与所有四种类别相对应的实践的例子。而且,正如作者所证明的那样,大学不需要简单地成为中产阶级化的代理人,也不需要参与促进良性忽视的政策。相反,高等教育能够而且必须促进以社区为基础的伙伴关系,寻求“改造”社区,改善学校,推进教学、学习、研究和服务(第55页)。为此,作者描述了1992年一个以社区为中心的大学中心的创建和演变,现在被称为奈特社区伙伴关系中心,负责监督学术参与项目,以及宾夕法尼亚大学助理学院的倡议。在几乎所有的章节中,作者都证明了持续的合作和坚定的大学领导对于确保城市大学的潜力和力量能够被利用来促进积极的变化至关重要。尽管宾夕法尼亚大学的例子强调了当机构致力于城市参与时可以做些什么,但其他章节展示了教师和个别课程如何改变学生和居民的生活。因此,该系列提供了各种规模的例子-从街区,社区,城市和地区学校的“……在此过程中,编辑们认为,参与其中的大学能够而且应该在塑造“包容、公平和可持续”的社区方面做得更多,大学需要在covid -19后的世界中发挥更大的领导作用(第189页)。当然,在几个例子机构的情况下,值得认识到的是,许多机构——特别是城市公共机构——可获得的财政资源比那些由数十亿或数十亿美元捐赠基金(里士满、宾夕法尼亚和迈阿密)支持的更富有的私人机构要有限得多。因此,社区参与的规模和范围将因机构类型、使命和地理位置而异。作为一名应用型学者和学术管理人员,致力于以社区为基础的学习,从事学术研究和公共服务,促进当地经济发展机会,加强当地工业,促进协作性综合书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Economic development—jobs, income, and community prosperity—is a continuing challenge to modern society. To meet this challenge, economic developers must use imagination and common sense, coupled with the tools of public and private finance, politics, planning, micro- and macroeconomics, engineering, and real estate. In short, the art of economic development must be supported by the science of research. And only one journal—Economic Development Quarterly: The Journal of American Economic Revitalization (EDQ)—effectively bridges the gap between academics, policy makers, and practitioners and links the various economic development communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信