An Ambivalent Nemesis: Philip Roth, Commentary, and the American Jewish Intellectual

Q2 Arts and Humanities
I. L. Heister
{"title":"An Ambivalent Nemesis: Philip Roth, Commentary, and the American Jewish Intellectual","authors":"I. L. Heister","doi":"10.1353/prs.2021.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The Anatomy Lesson (1983) features Philip Roth’s most extensive fictional treatment of Commentary, the magazine of Jewish affairs founded in 1945 and patronized by the American Jewish Committee. Before Roth’s apparent break with Commentary in the wake of Irving Howe’s and Norman Podhoretz’s one-two punch to his career in the December 1972 issue, the magazine was part of Roth’s emerging sense of a distinctly American Jewish intellectual identity while helping him separate from what he perceived to be his own limiting origins. A reconsideration of Roth’s dealings with the magazine complicates the sharp distinction often made between Commentary’s sometimes romanticized history as a bastion of postwar, left liberalism in the 1940s and 1950s, on the one hand, and its more familiar iteration as a flagship publication of neoconservatism in the 1970s and 1980s, on the other. Turning to Roth’s fiction as an additional source of insight yields an aesthetic theory of fiction as a space for an analytical encounter with ambivalence.","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2021.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT:The Anatomy Lesson (1983) features Philip Roth’s most extensive fictional treatment of Commentary, the magazine of Jewish affairs founded in 1945 and patronized by the American Jewish Committee. Before Roth’s apparent break with Commentary in the wake of Irving Howe’s and Norman Podhoretz’s one-two punch to his career in the December 1972 issue, the magazine was part of Roth’s emerging sense of a distinctly American Jewish intellectual identity while helping him separate from what he perceived to be his own limiting origins. A reconsideration of Roth’s dealings with the magazine complicates the sharp distinction often made between Commentary’s sometimes romanticized history as a bastion of postwar, left liberalism in the 1940s and 1950s, on the one hand, and its more familiar iteration as a flagship publication of neoconservatism in the 1970s and 1980s, on the other. Turning to Roth’s fiction as an additional source of insight yields an aesthetic theory of fiction as a space for an analytical encounter with ambivalence.
矛盾的宿敌:菲利普·罗斯、《评论》和美国犹太知识分子
摘要:《解剖课》(1983)以菲利普·罗斯对《评论》的最广泛的虚构处理为特色,这本犹太事务杂志创办于1945年,由美国犹太委员会赞助。在欧文·豪和诺曼·波德霍雷茨在1972年12月的一期杂志上对自己的职业生涯进行了一记重拳之后,罗斯显然与《评论》决裂之前,这本杂志是罗斯逐渐形成的明显的美国犹太知识分子身份感的一部分,同时帮助他摆脱了他认为自己的局限性出身。重新审视罗斯与该杂志的交往,使《评论》有时被浪漫化的历史与它在20世纪70年代和80年代作为新保守主义旗舰出版物的更为熟悉的迭代之间的鲜明区别变得复杂。将罗斯的小说作为一种额外的洞察力来源,产生了一种小说美学理论,将其作为一种与矛盾心理进行分析的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philip Roth Studies
Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信