The perspectives of patients and spine surgeons on the effectiveness and reliability of telemedicine consultations for spine ailments—A glimpse at the Indian scenario

Q4 Medicine
V. Viswanathan, A. Shetty, C. Murugan, Rohit Kavishkar, R. Kanna, S. Rajasekaran
{"title":"The perspectives of patients and spine surgeons on the effectiveness and reliability of telemedicine consultations for spine ailments—A glimpse at the Indian scenario","authors":"V. Viswanathan, A. Shetty, C. Murugan, Rohit Kavishkar, R. Kanna, S. Rajasekaran","doi":"10.4103/isj.isj_104_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In view of the ongoing pandemic, telemedicine has been increasingly adopted worldwide. This study was planned to evaluate the effectiveness of telemedicine for patients with spine ailments, and to assess the satisfaction rates and concerns of spine surgeons and patients regarding telemedicine consultations in the Indian scenario. Materials and Methods: Telemedicine appointments for spine patients were conducted through “Zoom Healthcare” online platform between April and December 2020 in a tertiary-care spine center. Questionnaires (including nine and five questions, respectively) were filled by patients and doctors after their consultations. The questionnaire included questions on overall satisfaction, time consumption, ease of setting-up appointment, ease of communication, influence on decision-making, and patient preference. Results: Overall, 70.1%, 23.6%, and 6.3% of patients replied that they were “very satisfied,” “satisfied,” and dissatisfied,” respectively, with their telemedicine appointments. Among postoperative follow-up patients, 69%, 30.2%, and 0.8% expressed that they were “very satisfied,” “satisfied,” and dissatisfied,” respectively, with telemedicine. At the end of session, 88.5% patients opined that they would still prefer a telemedicine appointment for the completed consultation, and 93.4% were happy to use telemedicine for future visits. In all, 100%, 94.1%, and 75% of patients, who belonged to other countries, other cities, and same city, respectively, were satisfied or very satisfied from telemedicine consultations. The doctor’s responses were “very satisfied” or “satisfied” on 96.5% of occasions overall. The doctors required approximately 24.1 min for conducting a telemedicine appointment. Three major concerns for doctors included difficulty in procuring good-quality magnetic resonance imaging (17%), problems with connectivity (14.6%), and difficulty in eliciting certain physical findings (13.2%). Conclusion: Telemedicine is an effective alternative to in-person visits for the assessment of patients with spine ailments. Patients belonging to more distant geographic locations (as compared with local residents) and those requiring postoperative follow-ups can be significantly benefited by this modality.","PeriodicalId":34652,"journal":{"name":"Indian Spine Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"82 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/isj.isj_104_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In view of the ongoing pandemic, telemedicine has been increasingly adopted worldwide. This study was planned to evaluate the effectiveness of telemedicine for patients with spine ailments, and to assess the satisfaction rates and concerns of spine surgeons and patients regarding telemedicine consultations in the Indian scenario. Materials and Methods: Telemedicine appointments for spine patients were conducted through “Zoom Healthcare” online platform between April and December 2020 in a tertiary-care spine center. Questionnaires (including nine and five questions, respectively) were filled by patients and doctors after their consultations. The questionnaire included questions on overall satisfaction, time consumption, ease of setting-up appointment, ease of communication, influence on decision-making, and patient preference. Results: Overall, 70.1%, 23.6%, and 6.3% of patients replied that they were “very satisfied,” “satisfied,” and dissatisfied,” respectively, with their telemedicine appointments. Among postoperative follow-up patients, 69%, 30.2%, and 0.8% expressed that they were “very satisfied,” “satisfied,” and dissatisfied,” respectively, with telemedicine. At the end of session, 88.5% patients opined that they would still prefer a telemedicine appointment for the completed consultation, and 93.4% were happy to use telemedicine for future visits. In all, 100%, 94.1%, and 75% of patients, who belonged to other countries, other cities, and same city, respectively, were satisfied or very satisfied from telemedicine consultations. The doctor’s responses were “very satisfied” or “satisfied” on 96.5% of occasions overall. The doctors required approximately 24.1 min for conducting a telemedicine appointment. Three major concerns for doctors included difficulty in procuring good-quality magnetic resonance imaging (17%), problems with connectivity (14.6%), and difficulty in eliciting certain physical findings (13.2%). Conclusion: Telemedicine is an effective alternative to in-person visits for the assessment of patients with spine ailments. Patients belonging to more distant geographic locations (as compared with local residents) and those requiring postoperative follow-ups can be significantly benefited by this modality.
患者和脊柱外科医生对脊柱疾病远程医疗咨询的有效性和可靠性的看法——印度情况的一瞥
导言:鉴于持续的大流行,远程医疗在世界范围内得到越来越多的采用。本研究旨在评估远程医疗对脊柱疾病患者的有效性,并评估印度情景下脊柱外科医生和患者对远程医疗咨询的满意度和关注点。材料与方法:于2020年4月至12月在某三级保健脊柱中心通过“Zoom Healthcare”在线平台对脊柱患者进行远程医疗预约。问卷(分别包括9个和5个问题)由患者和医生在会诊后填写。问卷包括总体满意度、耗时、预约难易程度、沟通难易程度、对决策的影响程度和患者偏好等问题。结果:总体而言,70.1%、23.6%和6.3%的患者分别对远程医疗预约表示“非常满意”、“满意”和“不满意”。术后随访患者中,69%、30.2%和0.8%分别表示对远程医疗“非常满意”、“满意”和“不满意”。在会议结束时,88.5%的患者认为他们仍然更愿意在完成咨询后进行远程医疗预约,93.4%的患者愿意在未来的就诊中使用远程医疗。来自其他国家、其他城市和同一城市的患者对远程医疗会诊满意度分别为100%、94.1%和75%。在96.5%的情况下,医生的回答是“非常满意”或“满意”。医生进行远程医疗预约大约需要24.1分钟。医生关注的三大问题包括难以获得高质量的磁共振成像(17%)、连通性问题(14.6%)和难以获得某些物理检查结果(13.2%)。结论:远程医疗是对脊柱疾病患者进行评估的有效替代。地理位置较远的患者(与当地居民相比)和需要术后随访的患者可以明显受益于这种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Spine Journal
Indian Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信