Perceived Stress and Association with Sociodemographic, Interpersonal Relationship and COVID-19 Lockdown Related Stress in South Africa

Q3 Nursing
M. Maepa, Atholl Kleinhans, A. Lentoor
{"title":"Perceived Stress and Association with Sociodemographic, Interpersonal Relationship and COVID-19 Lockdown Related Stress in South Africa","authors":"M. Maepa, Atholl Kleinhans, A. Lentoor","doi":"10.2174/18749445-v16-e230116-2022-106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n COVID-19 pandemic was declared a global public health emergency in March 2020. South Africa, like many countries, was not spared from this pandemic. In March 2020, the president announced a nationwide lockdown with social restrictions aimed to curb the spread of the virus. Such lockdown restrictions disrupted the normal day to day life for South Africans, leading to personal stress. \n \n \n \n The current study aimed to explore perceived stress and lockdown related stress among South African adults during the first wave of COVID 19. \n \n \n \n This study was cross-sectional in nature, using a sample of 203 adult males and females who were selected using a convenience sampling method on online social media platforms such as WhatsApp and Facebook. Participants completed an online survey that assessed socio-demographic information, perceived stress and lockdown related stress. \n \n \n \n A significant statical difference between males and females regarding their experience of lockdown related stress t (281) = 1.35, p < .004 was found. Relationship status was also significant for lockdown related stress t (281) = -2.02, p< .001 and perceived stress t= (281) = -.08, p< .000. No significant statistical difference between young and older adults in their experience of lockdown related stress and perceived stress was found. \n \n \n \n Male participants reported more lockdown related stress, while female participants reported more perceived stress. There were no age differences in lockdown related stress and perceived stress. People without intimate relationships reported more lockdown related stress and perceived stress than people with intimate relationships.\n","PeriodicalId":38960,"journal":{"name":"Open Public Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Public Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/18749445-v16-e230116-2022-106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic was declared a global public health emergency in March 2020. South Africa, like many countries, was not spared from this pandemic. In March 2020, the president announced a nationwide lockdown with social restrictions aimed to curb the spread of the virus. Such lockdown restrictions disrupted the normal day to day life for South Africans, leading to personal stress. The current study aimed to explore perceived stress and lockdown related stress among South African adults during the first wave of COVID 19. This study was cross-sectional in nature, using a sample of 203 adult males and females who were selected using a convenience sampling method on online social media platforms such as WhatsApp and Facebook. Participants completed an online survey that assessed socio-demographic information, perceived stress and lockdown related stress. A significant statical difference between males and females regarding their experience of lockdown related stress t (281) = 1.35, p < .004 was found. Relationship status was also significant for lockdown related stress t (281) = -2.02, p< .001 and perceived stress t= (281) = -.08, p< .000. No significant statistical difference between young and older adults in their experience of lockdown related stress and perceived stress was found. Male participants reported more lockdown related stress, while female participants reported more perceived stress. There were no age differences in lockdown related stress and perceived stress. People without intimate relationships reported more lockdown related stress and perceived stress than people with intimate relationships.
南非的感知压力及其与社会人口、人际关系和COVID-19封锁相关压力的关系
新冠肺炎疫情于2020年3月被宣布为全球突发公共卫生事件。与许多国家一样,南非也未能幸免于这场疫情。2020年3月,总统宣布在全国范围内实施封锁,并采取社会限制措施,以遏制病毒的传播。这种封锁限制扰乱了南非人的正常日常生活,导致了个人压力。目前的研究旨在探索第一波新冠肺炎疫情期间南非成年人的感知压力和封锁相关压力。这项研究是横断面的,使用了203名成年男性和女性的样本,他们是在WhatsApp和Facebook等在线社交媒体平台上使用方便抽样方法选择的。参与者完成了一项在线调查,评估了社会人口统计信息、感知压力和与封锁相关的压力。男性和女性在经历封锁相关压力方面存在显著的统计学差异,t(281)=1.35,p<.004。与封锁相关的压力t(281)=-2.02,p<.001,感知压力t=(281)=-.08,p<.000的关系状态也很显著。年轻人和老年人在经历与封锁相关的压力和感知压力方面没有发现显著的统计差异。男性参与者报告了更多与封锁相关的压力,而女性参与者则报告了更多的感知压力。与封锁相关的压力和感知压力没有年龄差异。与有亲密关系的人相比,没有亲密关系的人群报告了更多与封锁相关的压力和感知压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Public Health Journal
Open Public Health Journal Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The Open Public Health Journal is an Open Access online journal which publishes original research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, short articles and guest edited single topic issues in the field of public health. Topics covered in this interdisciplinary journal include: public health policy and practice; theory and methods; occupational health and education; epidemiology; social medicine; health services research; ethics; environmental health; adolescent health; AIDS care; mental health care. The Open Public Health Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信