Bright and dark side of knowledge management practices in firms using information systems: examining different moderating impacts

IF 2.7 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Sheshadri Chatterjee, Ranjan Chaudhuri, D. Vrontis
{"title":"Bright and dark side of knowledge management practices in firms using information systems: examining different moderating impacts","authors":"Sheshadri Chatterjee, Ranjan Chaudhuri, D. Vrontis","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-07-2022-0222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis research aims to find out the impact of knowledge sharing (KS) and knowledge hiding (KH) on employee creativity (EC) and eventually on firm innovativeness (FI). The study also investigates the moderating roles of incentive focus, preventive focus and enterprise social networking (ESN) adoption on EC and FI.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study used an empirical research approach and created a research model using resource-based view theory and literature. The model was validated using the partial least squares structural equation modeling technique to analyze data from 347 respondents from Indian firms.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors found that there is a considerable moderating impact of all three moderators on EC and firms’ innovativeness. KS has a positive impact and KH has a negative impact on EC.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nKnowledge can be shared within a firm by using an ESN tool. KS is the brighter side of the knowledge management process, whereas KH is the darker side of it. The study presents insights into and prescriptions for the bright and dark sides of knowledge management. The study results also imply that the firm managers must try to properly integrate the knowledge acquired from various stakeholders such as institutions, customers, competitors and suppliers as well as to focus on the tacit, precious and distinctive knowledge helpful to sustain long-term relationships with the valued external sources. The study empirically validates the model with the respondents from Indian firms, and thus the proposed model cannot be generalized.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFew research studies have examined both the bright and dark sides of the knowledge management process. There is a growing interest among researchers and practitioners to explore these sides of the knowledge management process using information systems and knowledge risk. Moreover, the proposed theoretical model has a high explanative power that makes the model effective and unique.\n","PeriodicalId":45590,"journal":{"name":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-07-2022-0222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This research aims to find out the impact of knowledge sharing (KS) and knowledge hiding (KH) on employee creativity (EC) and eventually on firm innovativeness (FI). The study also investigates the moderating roles of incentive focus, preventive focus and enterprise social networking (ESN) adoption on EC and FI. Design/methodology/approach The study used an empirical research approach and created a research model using resource-based view theory and literature. The model was validated using the partial least squares structural equation modeling technique to analyze data from 347 respondents from Indian firms. Findings The authors found that there is a considerable moderating impact of all three moderators on EC and firms’ innovativeness. KS has a positive impact and KH has a negative impact on EC. Research limitations/implications Knowledge can be shared within a firm by using an ESN tool. KS is the brighter side of the knowledge management process, whereas KH is the darker side of it. The study presents insights into and prescriptions for the bright and dark sides of knowledge management. The study results also imply that the firm managers must try to properly integrate the knowledge acquired from various stakeholders such as institutions, customers, competitors and suppliers as well as to focus on the tacit, precious and distinctive knowledge helpful to sustain long-term relationships with the valued external sources. The study empirically validates the model with the respondents from Indian firms, and thus the proposed model cannot be generalized. Originality/value Few research studies have examined both the bright and dark sides of the knowledge management process. There is a growing interest among researchers and practitioners to explore these sides of the knowledge management process using information systems and knowledge risk. Moreover, the proposed theoretical model has a high explanative power that makes the model effective and unique.
使用信息系统的企业知识管理实践的光明面和黑暗面:检验不同的调节作用
本研究旨在探讨知识共享(KS)和知识隐藏(KH)对员工创造力(EC)的影响,进而对企业创新性(FI)的影响。本研究还探讨了激励焦点、预防焦点和企业社交网络(ESN)采用对企业绩效和财务绩效的调节作用。设计/方法/途径本研究采用实证研究方法,运用资源基础观理论和文献建立研究模型。利用偏最小二乘结构方程建模技术对来自印度公司的347名受访者的数据进行了验证。研究结果作者发现,这三种调节因子对电子商务和企业创新能力都有相当大的调节作用。KS对EC有正向影响,KH对EC有负向影响。研究局限/启示通过使用ESN工具,知识可以在公司内部共享。KS是知识管理过程中光明的一面,而KH则是黑暗的一面。该研究对知识管理的光明面和黑暗面提出了见解和建议。研究结果还表明,企业管理者必须尝试适当整合从机构、客户、竞争对手和供应商等不同利益相关者那里获得的知识,并关注有助于与有价值的外部资源维持长期关系的隐性、宝贵和独特的知识。该研究以印度公司的受访者为实证验证了该模型,因此所提出的模型不能推广。原创性/价值很少有研究同时考察了知识管理过程的光明面和阴暗面。研究人员和从业人员越来越有兴趣利用信息系统和知识风险来探索知识管理过程的这些方面。此外,所提出的理论模型具有较高的解释力,使模型具有有效性和独特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信