A SINGLE INSTITUTIONAL AUDIT OF SETUP ERRORS FOR 3DCRT RECTAL CANCERS

Q4 Medicine
W. Z. Chew, W. L. Jong, Z. Jamaluddin, Haiza Fasha Zakaraiah, A. Kadri, Mohamad Afandi Azman, Jasmin Loh, G. Ho
{"title":"A SINGLE INSTITUTIONAL AUDIT OF SETUP ERRORS FOR 3DCRT RECTAL CANCERS","authors":"W. Z. Chew, W. L. Jong, Z. Jamaluddin, Haiza Fasha Zakaraiah, A. Kadri, Mohamad Afandi Azman, Jasmin Loh, G. Ho","doi":"10.22452/JUMMEC.VOL23NO1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Set-up errors are errors which are inevitable in radiotherapy. However, they should be kept to a minimum to achieve the maximum radiation dose to a tumour as to maximise treatment efficacy. This study aims to quantify those errors and assess if they remain within the tolerance limit of 5 mm in all directions. This study will also determine the adequacy of the margins for set up error for 3DCRT of rectal cancers at University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC).Methods: A total of 20 rectal cancer patients (July 2018 to May 2019) who were treated with radiotherapy amounting to a total of 119 CBCT images were included in the study. Population systematic errors and random setup errors were calculated.Results: Population systematic errors and random setup errors in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral direction were tabulated in Table 1. There is a large deviation (>5 mm) noted in some patients’ setup between the first 3 days and the next successive day of imaging. Clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin were calculated using Van Herk’s margin recipe (M=2.5Σ+0.7σ). The margins were 5.0 mm, 6.2 mm, and 4.0 mm for vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions, respectively. The systematic error for the population was 1.1 mm, 0.9 mm, 0.9 mm in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions respectively, while the random error is 3.2 mm, 5.7 mm and 2.5 mm in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions respectively.Conclusion: All of the patients involved in the study were within tolerance limits at some point in their treatment. The results demonstrated that a larger margin is needed in the longitudinal direction. Weekly CBCT is also necessary after the initial 3-day imaging to ensure that patients are kept within the tolerance limits.","PeriodicalId":39135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the University of Malaya Medical Centre","volume":"23 1","pages":"6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the University of Malaya Medical Centre","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/JUMMEC.VOL23NO1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Set-up errors are errors which are inevitable in radiotherapy. However, they should be kept to a minimum to achieve the maximum radiation dose to a tumour as to maximise treatment efficacy. This study aims to quantify those errors and assess if they remain within the tolerance limit of 5 mm in all directions. This study will also determine the adequacy of the margins for set up error for 3DCRT of rectal cancers at University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC).Methods: A total of 20 rectal cancer patients (July 2018 to May 2019) who were treated with radiotherapy amounting to a total of 119 CBCT images were included in the study. Population systematic errors and random setup errors were calculated.Results: Population systematic errors and random setup errors in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral direction were tabulated in Table 1. There is a large deviation (>5 mm) noted in some patients’ setup between the first 3 days and the next successive day of imaging. Clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin were calculated using Van Herk’s margin recipe (M=2.5Σ+0.7σ). The margins were 5.0 mm, 6.2 mm, and 4.0 mm for vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions, respectively. The systematic error for the population was 1.1 mm, 0.9 mm, 0.9 mm in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions respectively, while the random error is 3.2 mm, 5.7 mm and 2.5 mm in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions respectively.Conclusion: All of the patients involved in the study were within tolerance limits at some point in their treatment. The results demonstrated that a larger margin is needed in the longitudinal direction. Weekly CBCT is also necessary after the initial 3-day imaging to ensure that patients are kept within the tolerance limits.
3dcrt直肠癌设置错误的单一机构审计
背景:设置错误是放疗中不可避免的错误。然而,它们应该保持在最低限度,以达到对肿瘤的最大辐射剂量,以最大限度地提高治疗效果。本研究旨在量化这些误差,并评估它们是否在所有方向上保持在5毫米的公差限制内。本研究还将确定马来亚大学医学中心(UMMC)直肠癌3DCRT设置误差范围的充分性。方法:选取2018年7月至2019年5月接受放疗的20例直肠癌患者,共计119张CBCT图像。计算了总体系统误差和随机设置误差。结果:纵向、纵向和横向的总体系统误差和随机设置误差见表1。在一些患者的头3天和第二天的连续成像之间,有很大的偏差(bbb50 mm)。采用Van Herk切缘公式(M=2.5Σ+0.7σ)计算临床靶体积(CTV)与计划靶体积(PTV)的切缘。纵向、纵向和横向边缘分别为5.0 mm、6.2 mm和4.0 mm。总体纵向、纵向和横向的系统误差分别为1.1 mm、0.9 mm、0.9 mm,纵向、纵向和横向的随机误差分别为3.2 mm、5.7 mm和2.5 mm。结论:所有参与研究的患者在治疗过程中均在耐受限度内。结果表明,在纵向上需要较大的裕度。在最初的3天成像后,每周也需要进行CBCT检查,以确保患者保持在耐受范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信