Application value of ω-3 fish oil fat emulsion in the parenteral nutritional support treatment following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Q4 Medicine
T. Shan, Yigang Chen, B. Hong, C. Gu, Hong Zhou
{"title":"Application value of ω-3 fish oil fat emulsion in the parenteral nutritional support treatment following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer","authors":"T. Shan, Yigang Chen, B. Hong, C. Gu, Hong Zhou","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-9752.2019.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the application value of ω-3 fish oil fat emulsion in the parenteral nutritional support treatment following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. \n \n \nMethods \nThe retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 60 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Wuxi Second Hospital between January 2018 and December 2018 were collected. There were 37 males and 23 females, aged from 28 to 78 years, with an average age of 64 years. Thirty patients who received parenteral nutrition containing 100 mL of ω-3 fish oil fat emulsion after radical gastrectomy and 30 patients who received parenteral nutrition containing routine fat emulsion after radical gastrectomy were allocated into experimental group and control group, respectively. Observation indicators: (1) nutritional indicators in the perioperative period; (2) inflammatory indicators in the perioperative period; (3) immune indicators in the perioperative period; (4) postoperative complications. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was evaluated using the independent-sample t test. Count data were described as absolute numbers and percentages, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test. Repeated measurement data were analyzed by the repeated measures ANOVA. \n \n \nResults \n(1) Nutritional indicators in the perioperative period: the levels of total protein, albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin from preoperative day 1 to preoperative day 6 were respectively changed from (60.2±3.0)g/L to (57.2±3.1)g/L, from (35.3±3.1)g/L to (37.0±1.8)g/L, from (186±24)mg/L to (172±17)mg/L, from (3.0±0.7)g/L to (2.4±0.4)g/L in the experimental group and from (60.6±2.4)g/L to (55.7±4.2)g/L, from (35.0±3.8)g/L to (36.0±3.8)g/L, from (184±18)mg/L to (173±25)mg/L, from (3.1±0.6)g/L to (2.2±0.8)g/L in the control group, with no significant difference in the changing trends between the two groups (F=0.79, 2.14, 0.03, 0.36, P>0.05). (2) Inflammatory indicators in the perioperative period: the levels of white blood cells, C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor-α from preoperative day 1 to preoperative day 6 were respectively from (7.2±1.1)×109/L to (10.2±0.9)×109/L, from (7.2±2.3)mg/L to (25.5±6.3)mg/L, from (16±3)ng/L to (24±4)ng/L, from (17±4)ng/L to (22±5)ng/L in the experimental group and from (7.4±0.8)×109/L to (13.0±1.3)×109/L, from (6.9±2.4)mg/L to (41.6±18.9)mg/L, from (17±4)ng/L to (45±8)ng/L, from (16±4)ng/L to (43±7)ng/L in the control group, respectively, with significant differences in the changing trends between the two groups (F=63.05, 51.65, 127.82, 104.91, P 0.05). (4) Postoperative complications: 5 patients had postoperative complications, with a incidence rate of 16.7%(5/30), including 1 of abdominal infection, 1 of incisional infection, and 3 of pulmonary infection, and all the 5 patients were cured after symptomatic treatment. Nine patients had postoperative complications, with a incidence rate of 30.0%(9/30), including 2 of abdominal infection, 2 of incisional infection, and 5 of pulmonary infection, and all the 9 patients were cured after symptomatic treatment. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (χ2=1.491, P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nFor patients who receive gastric cancer surgery, ω-3 fish oil fat emulsion can reduce the inflammatory response, improve their immune function and not increase postoperative complications. \n \n \nKey words: \nGastric neoplasms; Gastric cancer; ω-3 fish oil fat emulsion; Nutritional support; Perioperative period; Complications","PeriodicalId":36400,"journal":{"name":"中华消化外科杂志","volume":"18 1","pages":"960-965"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-9752.2019.10.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To investigate the application value of ω-3 fish oil fat emulsion in the parenteral nutritional support treatment following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 60 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Wuxi Second Hospital between January 2018 and December 2018 were collected. There were 37 males and 23 females, aged from 28 to 78 years, with an average age of 64 years. Thirty patients who received parenteral nutrition containing 100 mL of ω-3 fish oil fat emulsion after radical gastrectomy and 30 patients who received parenteral nutrition containing routine fat emulsion after radical gastrectomy were allocated into experimental group and control group, respectively. Observation indicators: (1) nutritional indicators in the perioperative period; (2) inflammatory indicators in the perioperative period; (3) immune indicators in the perioperative period; (4) postoperative complications. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was evaluated using the independent-sample t test. Count data were described as absolute numbers and percentages, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test. Repeated measurement data were analyzed by the repeated measures ANOVA. Results (1) Nutritional indicators in the perioperative period: the levels of total protein, albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin from preoperative day 1 to preoperative day 6 were respectively changed from (60.2±3.0)g/L to (57.2±3.1)g/L, from (35.3±3.1)g/L to (37.0±1.8)g/L, from (186±24)mg/L to (172±17)mg/L, from (3.0±0.7)g/L to (2.4±0.4)g/L in the experimental group and from (60.6±2.4)g/L to (55.7±4.2)g/L, from (35.0±3.8)g/L to (36.0±3.8)g/L, from (184±18)mg/L to (173±25)mg/L, from (3.1±0.6)g/L to (2.2±0.8)g/L in the control group, with no significant difference in the changing trends between the two groups (F=0.79, 2.14, 0.03, 0.36, P>0.05). (2) Inflammatory indicators in the perioperative period: the levels of white blood cells, C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor-α from preoperative day 1 to preoperative day 6 were respectively from (7.2±1.1)×109/L to (10.2±0.9)×109/L, from (7.2±2.3)mg/L to (25.5±6.3)mg/L, from (16±3)ng/L to (24±4)ng/L, from (17±4)ng/L to (22±5)ng/L in the experimental group and from (7.4±0.8)×109/L to (13.0±1.3)×109/L, from (6.9±2.4)mg/L to (41.6±18.9)mg/L, from (17±4)ng/L to (45±8)ng/L, from (16±4)ng/L to (43±7)ng/L in the control group, respectively, with significant differences in the changing trends between the two groups (F=63.05, 51.65, 127.82, 104.91, P 0.05). (4) Postoperative complications: 5 patients had postoperative complications, with a incidence rate of 16.7%(5/30), including 1 of abdominal infection, 1 of incisional infection, and 3 of pulmonary infection, and all the 5 patients were cured after symptomatic treatment. Nine patients had postoperative complications, with a incidence rate of 30.0%(9/30), including 2 of abdominal infection, 2 of incisional infection, and 5 of pulmonary infection, and all the 9 patients were cured after symptomatic treatment. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (χ2=1.491, P>0.05). Conclusion For patients who receive gastric cancer surgery, ω-3 fish oil fat emulsion can reduce the inflammatory response, improve their immune function and not increase postoperative complications. Key words: Gastric neoplasms; Gastric cancer; ω-3 fish oil fat emulsion; Nutritional support; Perioperative period; Complications
ω-3鱼油脂肪乳在癌症胃切除术后胃肠外营养支持治疗中的应用价值
目的探讨ω-3鱼油脂肪乳在癌症胃切除术后胃肠外营养支持治疗中的应用价值。方法采用回顾性队列研究。收集2018年1月至2018年12月在南京医科大学附属无锡第二医院行癌症根治性胃切除术的60例患者的临床资料。男37例,女23例,年龄28~78岁,平均64岁。30例胃癌根治术后接受含ω-3鱼油脂肪乳100 mL肠外营养的患者和30例胃癌切除术后接受含有常规脂肪乳的肠外营养患者分别分为实验组和对照组。观察指标:(1)围手术期营养指标;(2) 围手术期炎症指标;(3) 围手术期免疫指标;(4) 术后并发症。具有正态分布的测量数据表示为Mean±SD,并使用独立样本t检验评估各组之间的比较。计数数据描述为绝对数和百分比,并使用卡方检验分析各组之间的比较。重复测量数据采用重复测量方差分析法进行分析。结果(1)围手术期营养指标:术前1天至术前6天,总蛋白、白蛋白、前白蛋白和转铁蛋白水平分别从(60.2±3.0)g/L变化为(57.2±3.1)g/L,从(35.3±3.1)g/L变化为(37.0±1.8)g/L,由(186±24)mg/L变化为(172±17)mg/L,从实验组的(3.0±0.7)g/L到(2.4±0.4)g/L,从对照组的(60.6±2.4)g/L到,(2)围手术期炎症指标:术前1天至术前6天白细胞、C反应蛋白、白细胞介素6、肿瘤坏死因子-α水平分别为(7.2±1.1)×109/L至(10.2±0.9)×109g/L,实验组从(7.2±2.3)mg/L到(25.5±6.3)mg/L,从(16±3)ng/L到(24±4)ng/L,从(17±4)ng/L到(22±5)ng/L,对照组从(7.4±0.8)×109/L到(13.0±1.3)×109 g/L,从(6.9±2.4)mg/L到(41.6±18.9)mg/L,从,术后并发症:术后并发症5例,发生率16.7%(5/30),其中腹部感染1例、切口感染1例,肺部感染3例,经对症治疗后全部治愈。术后并发症9例,发生率30.0%(9/30),其中腹部感染2例、切口感染2例,肺部感染5例,9例患者经对症治疗后全部治愈。两组术后并发症发生率无显著性差异(2=1.491,P>0.05)。关键词:胃肿瘤;癌症;ω-3鱼油脂肪乳;营养支持;围手术期;并发症
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华消化外科杂志
中华消化外科杂志 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4544
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信