De papeles y derechos. La difícil traducción del paradigma de derechos humanos en la política migratoria de la Argentina actual

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
A. Penchaszadeh
{"title":"De papeles y derechos. La difícil traducción del paradigma de derechos humanos en la política migratoria de la Argentina actual","authors":"A. Penchaszadeh","doi":"10.7440/COLOMBIAINT106.2021.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective/Context: The article seeks to analyze the problematic and paradoxical normative-administrative translation of the paradigm of human rights in Argentina’s current migration policies. The study of this case is of particular interest, on the one hand, because Argentina has been and is the leading Mercosur country receiving migrations in the past decades, and, on the other hand, because its migratory management model, inaugurated in 2004 with the sanction of the Law of Migrations 25871, even if it finds itself based around the human rights approach, coexists with an emphasized tendency towards securitization and control. Methodology: The investigation that supports this article is qualitative: the main ideas and conclusions have been extracted from the study of laws, decrees, regulations, reports, and resolutions emitted by different national and international public agencies, also from the comparison and contrast with secondary bibliography. Conclusions: The advancement of the securitarian approach on migration, centered more on control than regulation, together with the lack of normative and administrative adaptation of the different state agencies in the guaranty of rights recognized as universal, explain the ineffectiveness of the human rights paradigm in critical areas such as being the documentary regularization policy and the access to universal rights. Originality: The article seeks to deepen the analysis of Argentina’s migration policies, focusing on the different supra, intra, and counter-state levels involved in its implementation.","PeriodicalId":35154,"journal":{"name":"Colombia Internacional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombia Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/COLOMBIAINT106.2021.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective/Context: The article seeks to analyze the problematic and paradoxical normative-administrative translation of the paradigm of human rights in Argentina’s current migration policies. The study of this case is of particular interest, on the one hand, because Argentina has been and is the leading Mercosur country receiving migrations in the past decades, and, on the other hand, because its migratory management model, inaugurated in 2004 with the sanction of the Law of Migrations 25871, even if it finds itself based around the human rights approach, coexists with an emphasized tendency towards securitization and control. Methodology: The investigation that supports this article is qualitative: the main ideas and conclusions have been extracted from the study of laws, decrees, regulations, reports, and resolutions emitted by different national and international public agencies, also from the comparison and contrast with secondary bibliography. Conclusions: The advancement of the securitarian approach on migration, centered more on control than regulation, together with the lack of normative and administrative adaptation of the different state agencies in the guaranty of rights recognized as universal, explain the ineffectiveness of the human rights paradigm in critical areas such as being the documentary regularization policy and the access to universal rights. Originality: The article seeks to deepen the analysis of Argentina’s migration policies, focusing on the different supra, intra, and counter-state levels involved in its implementation.
文件和权利。将人权范式转化为当前阿根廷移民政策的困难
目的/背景:本文试图分析阿根廷现行移民政策中人权范式的规范性行政翻译存在的问题和矛盾。对这一案件的研究尤其令人感兴趣,一方面,因为阿根廷在过去几十年中一直是南方共同市场接收移民的主要国家,另一方面,由于其移民管理模式于2004年在《移民法》25871的批准下启动,即使它发现自己以人权方法为基础,与强调证券化和控制的趋势共存。方法:支持本文的调查是定性的:主要观点和结论是从对不同国家和国际公共机构发布的法律、法令、法规、报告和决议的研究中提取的,也是从与次要参考文献的比较和对比中提取的。结论:移民安全主义方法的进步,更多地集中在控制而非监管上,加上不同的国家机构在保障公认的普遍权利方面缺乏规范和行政适应,解释人权模式在文件规范化政策和获得普遍权利等关键领域的无效性。独创性:本文试图深化对阿根廷移民政策的分析,重点关注其实施过程中涉及的不同的超州、州内和反州层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Colombia Internacional
Colombia Internacional Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信