{"title":"Ingrid Laubrock: Dreamt Twice, Twice Dreamt","authors":"Ross Feller","doi":"10.1162/comj_r_00596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"versely, his compositional thinking informs his approach to performing. Regarding the issue of performativity—rather, liveness— Subespai mentions the following: “it comes directly as a result of how I work, how I create, how I record . . . If I find something . . . I want to be able to play it live, and also make a piece out of it. This forces me to take a lot of notes, manipulate a lot, make sure I can reproduce things days later. . . . It’s all like a long-running performance.” These comments help to characterize the composer’s attitude toward his work’s close relationship to performance. Regarding Subespai’s studio approach, he transforms his fundamental sound classes over time. However, what is most compelling is his maintenance of a relatively small group of samples. This limitation, coupled with the studio tools he uses, helps to simplify a given musical process, regardless of any musical, timbral, or noise-based element used. Often, this setup results in a sense of stasis heard throughout The Present Time. Another attitude that influenced the outcome of Subespai’s studio composition is his view on the occurrence of everyday life events. Regarding this issue, Subespai is concerned with life’s extreme nuanced range and its ambiguity, which is inherent in much of our daily experience. Therefore, one could view Subespai’s studio practice as a reflection of his perception of the natural world. This concept reflects the composer’s strategy in the studio, combining organic and so-called artificial sounds, or a more environmentally based sound palette, with noise. Ultimately, the following statements made by Subespai confirm our musical observations of his work in the studio: “I just love mixing stuff that has nothing to do with each other, creating new atmospheres that didn’t exist . . . the listener will come up with their own images to go along with the tracks, their own story.” For Subespai, his studio practice allows for freedom and experimentation, the results of which are then directly integrated in his work. Overall, his process of experimentation forms the foundation of this composition. A distinctive feature in track 3, “A brief moment of stillness,” is the emergence of a bright and active color amidst a more dense layering. This process seems to have resulted in a blend of sound that is more unidentifiable compared with other sections heard previously. This type of patterning and interweaving of sound material may offer a listener multiple perspectives, perhaps provoking alternative imagery. As such, the composer has carefully selected materials in preparing this track, and, similar to what the title suggests, stillness is achieved. This track’s sound world, with its ambiguous range of color and density, progresses further, compared with the musical contrasts found in the previous tracks. In track 4, “Sandglass,” prerecorded material is looped in a distinctive manner, and pitted alongside another partially looped layer. The composer brings these elements together, overlapping them with other noise-based streams. The result alludes to impressions of a flowing concentration of sand. A nature-based sound has been juxtaposed onto the granular texture as well. Overall, one could view the total range of sound classes present in this track as forming groupings of cross-rhythmic patterning. “Braidwood to Northside,” track 5, offers the listener a seemingly constrained or limited acoustic space, wherein environmental elements of wind and burning wood, and other ambiguous sound classes are brought together. This results in a physical sense of place, offering the listener a visceral, multidimensional sound complex, provoking a sense of physical movement. In sum, The Present Time highlights the composer’s ability to create a broad, and sometimes complex, mixture of sonic weight or color, rather than any particular electronic music technique, or reference to genre and historical precedence. Here, Subespai is successful in his arrangement of material, loosely preparing his sound material in a manner that allows him to repeatedly experiment until the desired sonic result emerges.","PeriodicalId":50639,"journal":{"name":"Computer Music Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"81-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Music Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9934869/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
versely, his compositional thinking informs his approach to performing. Regarding the issue of performativity—rather, liveness— Subespai mentions the following: “it comes directly as a result of how I work, how I create, how I record . . . If I find something . . . I want to be able to play it live, and also make a piece out of it. This forces me to take a lot of notes, manipulate a lot, make sure I can reproduce things days later. . . . It’s all like a long-running performance.” These comments help to characterize the composer’s attitude toward his work’s close relationship to performance. Regarding Subespai’s studio approach, he transforms his fundamental sound classes over time. However, what is most compelling is his maintenance of a relatively small group of samples. This limitation, coupled with the studio tools he uses, helps to simplify a given musical process, regardless of any musical, timbral, or noise-based element used. Often, this setup results in a sense of stasis heard throughout The Present Time. Another attitude that influenced the outcome of Subespai’s studio composition is his view on the occurrence of everyday life events. Regarding this issue, Subespai is concerned with life’s extreme nuanced range and its ambiguity, which is inherent in much of our daily experience. Therefore, one could view Subespai’s studio practice as a reflection of his perception of the natural world. This concept reflects the composer’s strategy in the studio, combining organic and so-called artificial sounds, or a more environmentally based sound palette, with noise. Ultimately, the following statements made by Subespai confirm our musical observations of his work in the studio: “I just love mixing stuff that has nothing to do with each other, creating new atmospheres that didn’t exist . . . the listener will come up with their own images to go along with the tracks, their own story.” For Subespai, his studio practice allows for freedom and experimentation, the results of which are then directly integrated in his work. Overall, his process of experimentation forms the foundation of this composition. A distinctive feature in track 3, “A brief moment of stillness,” is the emergence of a bright and active color amidst a more dense layering. This process seems to have resulted in a blend of sound that is more unidentifiable compared with other sections heard previously. This type of patterning and interweaving of sound material may offer a listener multiple perspectives, perhaps provoking alternative imagery. As such, the composer has carefully selected materials in preparing this track, and, similar to what the title suggests, stillness is achieved. This track’s sound world, with its ambiguous range of color and density, progresses further, compared with the musical contrasts found in the previous tracks. In track 4, “Sandglass,” prerecorded material is looped in a distinctive manner, and pitted alongside another partially looped layer. The composer brings these elements together, overlapping them with other noise-based streams. The result alludes to impressions of a flowing concentration of sand. A nature-based sound has been juxtaposed onto the granular texture as well. Overall, one could view the total range of sound classes present in this track as forming groupings of cross-rhythmic patterning. “Braidwood to Northside,” track 5, offers the listener a seemingly constrained or limited acoustic space, wherein environmental elements of wind and burning wood, and other ambiguous sound classes are brought together. This results in a physical sense of place, offering the listener a visceral, multidimensional sound complex, provoking a sense of physical movement. In sum, The Present Time highlights the composer’s ability to create a broad, and sometimes complex, mixture of sonic weight or color, rather than any particular electronic music technique, or reference to genre and historical precedence. Here, Subespai is successful in his arrangement of material, loosely preparing his sound material in a manner that allows him to repeatedly experiment until the desired sonic result emerges.
相反,他的作曲思维影响了他的表演方式。关于表现力的问题——更确切地说,是活力——Subespai提到了以下几点:“它直接来自于我如何工作、如何创作、如何记录的结果……如果我发现什么…我希望能够现场演奏它,并将其制作成一件作品。这迫使我做很多笔记,做很多操作,确保我能在几天后重现这些东西. . . .这就像是一场长期演出。”这些评论有助于描述作曲家对他的作品与表演的密切关系的态度。关于Subespai的工作室方法,他随着时间的推移改变了他的基本声音课程。然而,最令人信服的是他维持了一个相对较小的样本组。这种限制,加上他使用的工作室工具,有助于简化给定的音乐过程,无论使用任何音乐,音色或基于噪声的元素。通常,这种设置会导致一种停滞感,贯穿整个现世。影响Subespai工作室创作结果的另一个态度是他对日常生活事件发生的看法。关于这个问题,Subespai关注的是生活的极端微妙的范围和它的模糊性,这是我们日常经验中固有的。因此,人们可以将Subespai的工作室实践视为他对自然世界感知的反映。这个概念反映了作曲家在工作室的策略,将有机和所谓的人造声音,或更环保的声音调色板与噪音相结合。最后,Subespai的以下陈述证实了我们对他在录音室工作的音乐观察:“我只是喜欢把彼此无关的东西混在一起,创造出不存在的新氛围……听者会想到他们自己的图像,伴随着歌曲,他们自己的故事。”对于Subespai来说,他的工作室实践允许自由和实验,然后将其结果直接整合到他的作品中。总的来说,他的实验过程构成了这幅作品的基础。第3首“A brief moment of silence”的显著特点是在更密集的层次中出现了一种明亮而活跃的颜色。与之前听到的其他部分相比,这个过程似乎导致了一种更难以识别的声音混合。这种类型的模式和声音材料的交织可能会给听众提供多种视角,也许会激发另一种意象。因此,作曲家在准备这首歌时仔细选择了材料,并且,就像标题所暗示的那样,达到了静止。这首歌的声音世界,以其模糊的颜色和密度范围,进一步发展,与音乐对比发现在之前的曲目。在track 4“Sandglass”中,预先录制的材料以独特的方式循环,并与另一个部分循环层一起凹陷。作曲家将这些元素组合在一起,将它们与其他基于噪声的流重叠。这个结果暗示了一个流动的沙子集中的印象。基于自然的声音也被并置到颗粒纹理上。总的来说,一个人可以把这个轨道上的声音类别的总范围看作是形成跨节奏模式的分组。“Braidwood to Northside”,第5首,给听者提供了一个看似受限或有限的声学空间,其中风和燃烧的木头的环境元素,以及其他模糊的声音类别被聚集在一起。这就产生了一种物理感,为听众提供了一种发自内心的、多维度的声音综合体,激发了一种物理运动感。总而言之,The Present Time突出了作曲家创造一个广泛的,有时是复杂的,声音重量或颜色的混合,而不是任何特定的电子音乐技术,或参考流派和历史先例的能力。在这里,Subespai在他的材料安排上是成功的,松散地准备他的声音材料,以一种允许他反复实验直到期望的声音结果出现的方式。
期刊介绍:
Computer Music Journal is published quarterly with an annual sound and video anthology containing curated music¹. For four decades, it has been the leading publication about computer music, concentrating fully on digital sound technology and all musical applications of computers. This makes it an essential resource for musicians, composers, scientists, engineers, computer enthusiasts, and anyone exploring the wonders of computer-generated sound.
Edited by experts in the field and featuring an international advisory board of eminent computer musicians, issues typically include:
In-depth articles on cutting-edge research and developments in technology, methods, and aesthetics of computer music
Reports on products of interest, such as new audio and MIDI software and hardware
Interviews with leading composers of computer music
Announcements of and reports on conferences and courses in the United States and abroad
Publication, event, and recording reviews
Tutorials, letters, and editorials
Numerous graphics, photographs, scores, algorithms, and other illustrations.