MODELING THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE WITH POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE (PET) WASTE AS REPLACEMENT FOR FINE AGGREGATE USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK
{"title":"MODELING THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE WITH POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE (PET) WASTE AS REPLACEMENT FOR FINE AGGREGATE USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK","authors":"W. Ajagbe, M. Tijani, O. Odukoya","doi":"10.29081/jesr.v28i4.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tensile strength of concrete made with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste as replacement for fine aggregate was modelled using artificial neural network. A multilayer feedforward neural network (MLFFNN) and radial basis function (RBF) methodology were compared to see which was more accurate. The MLFFNN modelling results showed a predictive accuracy of 95.364% and a root mean square error value of 4.4409 × 10-16 while RBF neural network modeling results showed a higher predictive accuracy (99.509%) with a lower root mean square error value (1.6653 × 10-16). It is concluded that ANN models accurately predicted the tensile strength of PET concrete.","PeriodicalId":15687,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Studies and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Studies and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29081/jesr.v28i4.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tensile strength of concrete made with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste as replacement for fine aggregate was modelled using artificial neural network. A multilayer feedforward neural network (MLFFNN) and radial basis function (RBF) methodology were compared to see which was more accurate. The MLFFNN modelling results showed a predictive accuracy of 95.364% and a root mean square error value of 4.4409 × 10-16 while RBF neural network modeling results showed a higher predictive accuracy (99.509%) with a lower root mean square error value (1.6653 × 10-16). It is concluded that ANN models accurately predicted the tensile strength of PET concrete.