Alternative community-based models of care for young people with anorexia nervosa: the CostED national surveillance study

S. Byford, H. Petkova, R. Stuart, D. Nicholls, M. Simic, T. Ford, G. Macdonald, S. Gowers, S. Roberts, B. Barrett, J. Kelly, G. Kelly, Nuala Livingstone, K. Joshi, Helen Smith, I. Eisler
{"title":"Alternative community-based models of care for young people with anorexia nervosa: the CostED national surveillance study","authors":"S. Byford, H. Petkova, R. Stuart, D. Nicholls, M. Simic, T. Ford, G. Macdonald, S. Gowers, S. Roberts, B. Barrett, J. Kelly, G. Kelly, Nuala Livingstone, K. Joshi, Helen Smith, I. Eisler","doi":"10.3310/hsdr07370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Evidence suggests that investing in specialist eating disorders services for young people with anorexia nervosa could have important implications for the NHS, with the potential to improve health outcomes and reduce costs through reductions in the number and length of hospital admissions.\n \n \n \n The primary objectives were to evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of alternative community-based models of service provision for young people with anorexia nervosa and to model the impact of potential changes to the provision of specialist services.\n \n \n \n Observational surveillance study using the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Surveillance System.\n \n \n \n Community-based secondary or tertiary child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in the UK and the Republic of Ireland.\n \n \n \n A total of 298 young people aged 8–17 years in contact with CAMHS for a first episode of anorexia nervosa in accordance with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, diagnostic criteria.\n \n \n \n Community-based specialist eating disorders services and generic CAMHS.\n \n \n \n Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) score (primary outcome) and percentage of median expected body mass index (BMI) for age and sex (%mBMI) (secondary outcome) were assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months.\n \n \n \n Data were collected by clinicians from clinical records.\n \n \n \n Total costs incurred by young people initially assessed in specialist eating disorders services were not significantly different from those incurred by young people initially assessed in generic CAMHS. However, adjustment for baseline covariates resulted in observed differences favouring specialist services (costs were lower, on average) because of the significantly poorer clinical status of the specialist group at baseline. At the 6-month follow-up, mean %mBMI was significantly higher in the specialist group, but no other significant differences in outcomes were evident. Cost-effectiveness analyses suggest that initial assessment in a specialist service has a higher probability of being cost-effective than initial assessment in generic CAMHS, as determined by CGAS score and %mBMI. However, no firm conclusion can be drawn without knowledge of society’s willingness to pay for improvements in these outcomes. Decision modelling did not support the hypothesis that changes to the provision of specialist services would generate savings for the NHS, with results suggesting that cost per 10-point improvement in CGAS score (improvement from one CGAS category to the next) varies little as the percentage of participants taking the specialist or generic pathway is varied.\n \n \n \n Follow-up rates were lower than expected, but the sample was still larger than has been achieved to date in RCTs carried out in this population in the UK, and an exploration of the impact of missing cost and outcome data produced very similar results to those of the main analyses.\n \n \n \n The results of this study suggest that initial assessment in a specialist eating disorders service for young people with anorexia nervosa may have a higher probability of being cost-effective than initial assessment in generic CAMHS, although the associated uncertainty makes it hard to draw firm conclusions. Although costs and outcomes were similar, young people in specialist services were more severely ill at baseline, suggesting that specialist services were achieving larger clinical effectiveness gains without the need for additional expenditure. The results did not suggest that providing more specialist services would save money for the NHS, given similar costs and outcomes, so decisions about which service type to fund could be made with reference to other factors, such as the preferences of patients and carers.\n \n \n \n Data on measures of quality of life capable of generating quality-adjusted life-years are needed to confirm the cost-effectiveness of specialist services.\n \n \n \n Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12676087.\n \n \n \n This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 7, No. 37. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.\n","PeriodicalId":12880,"journal":{"name":"Health Services and Delivery Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services and Delivery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr07370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Evidence suggests that investing in specialist eating disorders services for young people with anorexia nervosa could have important implications for the NHS, with the potential to improve health outcomes and reduce costs through reductions in the number and length of hospital admissions. The primary objectives were to evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of alternative community-based models of service provision for young people with anorexia nervosa and to model the impact of potential changes to the provision of specialist services. Observational surveillance study using the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Surveillance System. Community-based secondary or tertiary child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. A total of 298 young people aged 8–17 years in contact with CAMHS for a first episode of anorexia nervosa in accordance with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, diagnostic criteria. Community-based specialist eating disorders services and generic CAMHS. Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) score (primary outcome) and percentage of median expected body mass index (BMI) for age and sex (%mBMI) (secondary outcome) were assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Data were collected by clinicians from clinical records. Total costs incurred by young people initially assessed in specialist eating disorders services were not significantly different from those incurred by young people initially assessed in generic CAMHS. However, adjustment for baseline covariates resulted in observed differences favouring specialist services (costs were lower, on average) because of the significantly poorer clinical status of the specialist group at baseline. At the 6-month follow-up, mean %mBMI was significantly higher in the specialist group, but no other significant differences in outcomes were evident. Cost-effectiveness analyses suggest that initial assessment in a specialist service has a higher probability of being cost-effective than initial assessment in generic CAMHS, as determined by CGAS score and %mBMI. However, no firm conclusion can be drawn without knowledge of society’s willingness to pay for improvements in these outcomes. Decision modelling did not support the hypothesis that changes to the provision of specialist services would generate savings for the NHS, with results suggesting that cost per 10-point improvement in CGAS score (improvement from one CGAS category to the next) varies little as the percentage of participants taking the specialist or generic pathway is varied. Follow-up rates were lower than expected, but the sample was still larger than has been achieved to date in RCTs carried out in this population in the UK, and an exploration of the impact of missing cost and outcome data produced very similar results to those of the main analyses. The results of this study suggest that initial assessment in a specialist eating disorders service for young people with anorexia nervosa may have a higher probability of being cost-effective than initial assessment in generic CAMHS, although the associated uncertainty makes it hard to draw firm conclusions. Although costs and outcomes were similar, young people in specialist services were more severely ill at baseline, suggesting that specialist services were achieving larger clinical effectiveness gains without the need for additional expenditure. The results did not suggest that providing more specialist services would save money for the NHS, given similar costs and outcomes, so decisions about which service type to fund could be made with reference to other factors, such as the preferences of patients and carers. Data on measures of quality of life capable of generating quality-adjusted life-years are needed to confirm the cost-effectiveness of specialist services. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12676087. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 7, No. 37. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
对患有神经性厌食症的年轻人的替代性社区护理模式:CostED国家监测研究
有证据表明,投资为患有神经性厌食症的年轻人提供专业饮食失调服务可能会对英国国家医疗服务体系产生重要影响,有可能通过减少住院人数和住院时间来改善健康状况并降低成本。主要目标是评估为患有神经性厌食症的年轻人提供服务的替代社区模式的成本和成本效益,并模拟提供专业服务的潜在变化的影响。使用儿童和青少年精神病学监测系统的观察监测研究。英国和爱尔兰共和国基于社区的二级或三级儿童和青少年心理健康服务。根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版的诊断标准,共有298名8-17岁的年轻人因首次出现神经性厌食症而接触CAMHS。社区饮食失调专家服务和通用CAMHS。在基线、6个月和12个月时评估儿童全球评估量表(CGAS)评分(主要结果)和年龄和性别的中位预期体重指数(BMI)百分比(%mBMI)(次要结果)。数据由临床医生从临床记录中收集。最初在专业饮食失调服务中评估的年轻人产生的总成本与最初在普通CAMHS中评估的青年人产生的成本没有显著差异。然而,对基线协变量的调整导致观察到的有利于专科服务的差异(平均成本较低),因为专科组在基线时的临床状况明显较差。在6个月的随访中,专家组的平均%mBMI显著较高,但没有明显的其他显著差异。成本效益分析表明,根据CGAS评分和%mBMI,专家服务的初始评估比普通CAMHS的初始评估具有更高的成本效益概率。然而,如果不了解社会是否愿意为改善这些结果买单,就无法得出确切的结论。决策模型不支持专家服务提供的变化将为NHS带来节约的假设,结果表明,CGAS评分每提高10分(从一个CGAS类别到下一个类别的提高)的成本变化不大,因为参加专家或普通途径的参与者的百分比不同。随访率低于预期,但样本仍比迄今为止在英国对该人群进行的随机对照试验中获得的样本大,对缺失成本和结果数据的影响的探索产生了与主要分析非常相似的结果。这项研究的结果表明,针对神经性厌食症年轻人的专业饮食失调服务的初步评估可能比普通CAMHS的初步评估更具成本效益,尽管相关的不确定性使得很难得出确切的结论。尽管成本和结果相似,但接受专科服务的年轻人在基线时病情更严重,这表明专科服务在不需要额外支出的情况下取得了更大的临床效果。考虑到类似的成本和结果,研究结果并没有表明提供更多的专科服务会为NHS节省资金,因此可以参考其他因素来决定资助哪种服务类型,例如患者和护理人员的偏好。需要能够产生质量调整寿命年的生活质量衡量数据,以确认专业服务的成本效益。当前对照试验ISRCTN12676087。该项目由国家卫生研究所(NIHR)卫生服务和分娩研究计划资助,并将在《卫生服务和交付研究》上全文发表;第7卷第37期。有关更多项目信息,请访问NIHR期刊图书馆网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信