Impact of Detection Mode in a Large Cohort of Women Taking Part in a Breast Screening Program.

Marilina García, M. Redondo, I. Zarcos, J. Louro, F. Rivas-Ruíz, T. Téllez, Diego Pérez, F. Medina Cano, K. Machan, L. Domingo, Maria del Mar Vernet, M. Padilla-Ruiz, X. Castells, M. Sala
{"title":"Impact of Detection Mode in a Large Cohort of Women Taking Part in a Breast Screening Program.","authors":"Marilina García, M. Redondo, I. Zarcos, J. Louro, F. Rivas-Ruíz, T. Téllez, Diego Pérez, F. Medina Cano, K. Machan, L. Domingo, Maria del Mar Vernet, M. Padilla-Ruiz, X. Castells, M. Sala","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-11-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nThe aim of this study was to evaluate the existing survival rate and clinical-pathological differences among patients with breast cancer detected by mammographic screening.\n\n\nMaterials and Methods\nThis multicenter cohort study examined 1,248 patients who took part in a national screening program for the early detection of breast cancer over an eight-year period.\n\n\nResults\nOf the two patient subgroups (interval and screening), we found significant differences in the distribution of prognostic factors, with interval cases presenting at a lower mean age (p = 0.002), with higher percentages of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) or triple negative and lower percentages of luminal A or luminal B carcinomas (p = 0.001), advanced stages (p<0.001), lower hormone receptor expression (p<0.001), poorer differentiation (p<0.001) and lower survival (p<0.001). Among the screening group, patients with tumors detected during the first screening round had a significantly lower mean age (p<0.001), a lower frequency of comorbidities (p = 0.038) and a lower tendency (p<0.1) to be diagnosed as triple negative breast carcinomas than incident cases.\n\n\nConclusion\nOur results highlight that breast tumors detected during the first screening round are frequently characterized by a more benign phenotype than the rest of the screening subgroups, which could be of help when stratifying the risk of death and selecting the best treatment option for each patient.","PeriodicalId":91975,"journal":{"name":"The journal of breast health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-11-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the existing survival rate and clinical-pathological differences among patients with breast cancer detected by mammographic screening. Materials and Methods This multicenter cohort study examined 1,248 patients who took part in a national screening program for the early detection of breast cancer over an eight-year period. Results Of the two patient subgroups (interval and screening), we found significant differences in the distribution of prognostic factors, with interval cases presenting at a lower mean age (p = 0.002), with higher percentages of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) or triple negative and lower percentages of luminal A or luminal B carcinomas (p = 0.001), advanced stages (p<0.001), lower hormone receptor expression (p<0.001), poorer differentiation (p<0.001) and lower survival (p<0.001). Among the screening group, patients with tumors detected during the first screening round had a significantly lower mean age (p<0.001), a lower frequency of comorbidities (p = 0.038) and a lower tendency (p<0.1) to be diagnosed as triple negative breast carcinomas than incident cases. Conclusion Our results highlight that breast tumors detected during the first screening round are frequently characterized by a more benign phenotype than the rest of the screening subgroups, which could be of help when stratifying the risk of death and selecting the best treatment option for each patient.
检测方式对参加乳房筛查项目的大批妇女的影响。
目的探讨乳腺x线检查发现的乳腺癌患者的现有生存率及临床病理差异。材料和方法这项多中心队列研究调查了1248名患者,这些患者参加了一项为期8年的国家乳腺癌早期检测筛查项目。结果在两个患者亚组(间隔期和筛查期)中,我们发现预后因素的分布存在显著差异,间隔期患者的平均年龄较低(p = 0.002),人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER-2)或三阴性比例较高,管腔a或管腔B癌比例较低(p = 0.001),晚期(p<0.001),激素受体表达较低(p<0.001)。分化较差(p<0.001),生存率较低(p<0.001)。在筛查组中,第一轮筛查中发现肿瘤的患者的平均年龄(p<0.001)、合并症的发生率(p = 0.038)和诊断为三阴性乳腺癌的倾向(p<0.1)明显低于偶发病例。结论:我们的研究结果强调,在第一轮筛查中发现的乳腺肿瘤通常比其他筛查亚组具有更良性的表型,这可能有助于对每个患者的死亡风险进行分层和选择最佳治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信