Fertility Projections in a European Context: A Survey of Current Practices among Statistical Agencies

IF 0.5 4区 数学 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS
R. Gleditsch, A. Syse, Michael J Thomas
{"title":"Fertility Projections in a European Context: A Survey of Current Practices among Statistical Agencies","authors":"R. Gleditsch, A. Syse, Michael J Thomas","doi":"10.2478/jos-2021-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Projection studies have often focused on mortality and, more recently, migration. Fertility is less studied, although even small changes can have significant repercussions for the size and age structure of future populations. Across Europe, there is no consensus on how fertility is best projected. In this article, we identify different approaches used to project fertility among statistical agencies in Europe and provide an assessment of the different approaches according to the producers themselves. Data were collected using a mixed-method approach. First, European statistical agencies answered a questionnaire regarding fertility projection practices. Second, an in-depth review of select countries was performed. Most agencies combine formal models with expert opinion. While many attempt to maximise the use of relevant inputs, there is more variation in the detail of outputs, with some agencies unable to account for changing age patterns. In a context of limited resources, most are satisfied with their approaches, though some are assessing alternative methodologies to improve accuracy and increase transparency. This study highlights the diversity of approaches used in fertility projections across Europe. Such knowledge may be useful to statistical agencies as they consider, test and implement different approaches, perhaps in collaboration with other agencies and the wider scientific community.","PeriodicalId":51092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Official Statistics","volume":"37 1","pages":"547 - 568"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Official Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2021-0025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Projection studies have often focused on mortality and, more recently, migration. Fertility is less studied, although even small changes can have significant repercussions for the size and age structure of future populations. Across Europe, there is no consensus on how fertility is best projected. In this article, we identify different approaches used to project fertility among statistical agencies in Europe and provide an assessment of the different approaches according to the producers themselves. Data were collected using a mixed-method approach. First, European statistical agencies answered a questionnaire regarding fertility projection practices. Second, an in-depth review of select countries was performed. Most agencies combine formal models with expert opinion. While many attempt to maximise the use of relevant inputs, there is more variation in the detail of outputs, with some agencies unable to account for changing age patterns. In a context of limited resources, most are satisfied with their approaches, though some are assessing alternative methodologies to improve accuracy and increase transparency. This study highlights the diversity of approaches used in fertility projections across Europe. Such knowledge may be useful to statistical agencies as they consider, test and implement different approaches, perhaps in collaboration with other agencies and the wider scientific community.
欧洲背景下的生育率预测:对统计机构当前做法的调查
预测研究通常侧重于死亡率,最近则侧重于移民。对生育率的研究较少,尽管即使是很小的变化也会对未来人口的规模和年龄结构产生重大影响。在整个欧洲,如何最好地预测生育率并没有达成共识。在本文中,我们确定了在欧洲统计机构中用于预测生育率的不同方法,并根据生产者本身对不同方法进行了评估。采用混合方法收集数据。首先,欧洲统计机构回答了一份关于生育率预测实践的问卷。其次,对选定的国家进行了深入审查。大多数机构将正式模型与专家意见结合起来。虽然许多机构试图最大限度地利用有关的投入,但产出的细节却有很大的差异,有些机构无法解释不断变化的年龄形态。在资源有限的情况下,大多数人对他们的方法感到满意,尽管有些人正在评估其他方法,以提高准确性和增加透明度。这项研究强调了欧洲各地生育率预测方法的多样性。在统计机构考虑、测试和执行不同的方法时,这些知识可能对它们有用,也许可以与其他机构和更广泛的科学界合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Official Statistics
Journal of Official Statistics STATISTICS & PROBABILITY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JOS is an international quarterly published by Statistics Sweden. We publish research articles in the area of survey and statistical methodology and policy matters facing national statistical offices and other producers of statistics. The intended readers are researchers or practicians at statistical agencies or in universities and private organizations dealing with problems which concern aspects of production of official statistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信