Is the “Grenville Front” in the central United States really the midcontinent rift?

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
GSA Today Pub Date : 2018-05-01 DOI:10.1130/GSATG357A.1
C. Stein, S. Stein, R. Elling, G. R. Keller, J. Kley
{"title":"Is the “Grenville Front” in the central United States really the midcontinent rift?","authors":"C. Stein, S. Stein, R. Elling, G. R. Keller, J. Kley","doi":"10.1130/GSATG357A.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two prominent Precambrian geologic features of central North America are the Midcontinent Rift (MCR) and Grenville Front (GF). The MCR, an extensive band of buried igneous and sedimentary rocks outcropping near Lake Superior, records a major rifting event at ca. 1.1 Ga that failed to split North America. In SE Canada, the GF is the continent-ward extent of deformation of the fold-and-thrust belt from the Grenville orogeny, the sequence of events from ca. 1.3–0.98 Ga culminating in the assembly of the supercontinent of Rodinia. In the central U.S., lineated gravity anomalies extending southward along the trend of the front in Canada have been interpreted as a buried Grenville Front. However, we use recent tectonic concepts and data analyses to argue that these anomalies delineate the eastern arm of the MCR extending from Michigan to Alabama, for multiple reasons: (1) These anomalies are similar to those along the remainder of the MCR and quite different from those across the front in Canada; (2) the Precambrian deformation observed on seismic reflection profiles across the presumed “front” appears quite different from that across the front in Canada, cannot confidently be assigned to the Grenville orogeny, and is recorded at least 100 km west of the “front”; and (3) during the Grenville orogeny, deformational events from Texas to Canada were not caused by the same plate interactions and were not necessarily synchronous. Hence the commonly inferred position of the “Grenville Front” in the central U.S. is part of the MCR, and should not be mapped as a separate entity.","PeriodicalId":35784,"journal":{"name":"GSA Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSA Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG357A.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Two prominent Precambrian geologic features of central North America are the Midcontinent Rift (MCR) and Grenville Front (GF). The MCR, an extensive band of buried igneous and sedimentary rocks outcropping near Lake Superior, records a major rifting event at ca. 1.1 Ga that failed to split North America. In SE Canada, the GF is the continent-ward extent of deformation of the fold-and-thrust belt from the Grenville orogeny, the sequence of events from ca. 1.3–0.98 Ga culminating in the assembly of the supercontinent of Rodinia. In the central U.S., lineated gravity anomalies extending southward along the trend of the front in Canada have been interpreted as a buried Grenville Front. However, we use recent tectonic concepts and data analyses to argue that these anomalies delineate the eastern arm of the MCR extending from Michigan to Alabama, for multiple reasons: (1) These anomalies are similar to those along the remainder of the MCR and quite different from those across the front in Canada; (2) the Precambrian deformation observed on seismic reflection profiles across the presumed “front” appears quite different from that across the front in Canada, cannot confidently be assigned to the Grenville orogeny, and is recorded at least 100 km west of the “front”; and (3) during the Grenville orogeny, deformational events from Texas to Canada were not caused by the same plate interactions and were not necessarily synchronous. Hence the commonly inferred position of the “Grenville Front” in the central U.S. is part of the MCR, and should not be mapped as a separate entity.
美国中部的“格伦维尔前线”真的是大陆中部裂谷吗?
北美洲中部两个突出的前寒武纪地质特征是中大陆裂谷(MCR)和格伦维尔前缘(GF)。MCR是苏必利尔湖附近露头的一条广泛的埋藏火成岩和沉积岩带,记录了约1.1 Ga的重大裂谷事件,未能分裂北美。在加拿大东南部,GF是格伦维尔造山运动褶皱和逆冲带向大陆变形的程度,这是约1.3–0.98 Ga的一系列事件,最终形成了罗迪尼亚超大陆。在美国中部,沿加拿大锋面趋势向南延伸的线性重力异常被解释为埋藏的格伦维尔锋面。然而,我们使用最近的构造概念和数据分析认为,这些异常描绘了从密歇根州延伸到阿拉巴马州的MCR东臂,原因有多种:(1)这些异常与MCR其余部分的异常相似,与加拿大前线的异常大不相同;(2) 在假定的“锋面”上的地震反射剖面上观察到的前寒武纪变形似乎与加拿大锋面上的变形大不相同,不能完全归属于格伦维尔造山运动,并且记录在“锋面“以西至少100公里处;和(3)在格伦维尔造山运动期间,从德克萨斯州到加拿大的变形事件不是由相同的板块相互作用引起的,也不一定是同步的。因此,通常推断的“格伦维尔前线”在美国中部的位置是MCR的一部分,不应作为一个单独的实体进行映射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GSA Today
GSA Today Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信