Madness and Text: The Psychiatric Paper as a Business and as a Means of Censorship

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
José Carlos Bermejo Barrera
{"title":"Madness and Text: The Psychiatric Paper as a Business and as a Means of Censorship","authors":"José Carlos Bermejo Barrera","doi":"10.24197/ST.2.2018.26-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolLas revistas son basicamente el unico canal a traves del cual los cientificos pueden hacer que el resultado de su investigacion sea conocido por sus colegas. Las revistas cientificas seleccionan la informacion que publican y garantizan su calidad mediante un procedimiento doble ciego de censura por parte de sus pares. Si por un lado este procedimiento parece logico como metodo para incluir un estudio dentro de un campo cientifico consolidado, tambien es cierto que puede funcionar como un mecanismo para la censura. Si, ademas, un campo cientifico como la farmacologia esta intimamente vinculado al interes comercial de las grandes empresas, las empresas y las revistas no solo se convierten en proveedores de orientacion, sino tambien en censores que ocultan una parte de la verdad y obstaculizan el avance cientifico para defender el interes economico de sus patentes. EnglishThe journals are basically the only channel through the scientists can make the result of their research know to their colleagues. Scientific journals select the information they publish and guarantee its quality by means of a double blind procedure of censorship by peers. If on the one hand this procedure seems logical as a method for including a study within a consolidated scientific field it is also true that it can function as a mechanism for censorship. If, furthermore, a scientific field such as pharmacology is intimately linked to the business interest of large companies then the companies and journals not only became providers of guidance, but also censors who conceal part of the truth and obstruct scientific advance to defend the economic interest of their patents.","PeriodicalId":40467,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia y Tecnociencia","volume":"8 1","pages":"26-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia y Tecnociencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24197/ST.2.2018.26-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

espanolLas revistas son basicamente el unico canal a traves del cual los cientificos pueden hacer que el resultado de su investigacion sea conocido por sus colegas. Las revistas cientificas seleccionan la informacion que publican y garantizan su calidad mediante un procedimiento doble ciego de censura por parte de sus pares. Si por un lado este procedimiento parece logico como metodo para incluir un estudio dentro de un campo cientifico consolidado, tambien es cierto que puede funcionar como un mecanismo para la censura. Si, ademas, un campo cientifico como la farmacologia esta intimamente vinculado al interes comercial de las grandes empresas, las empresas y las revistas no solo se convierten en proveedores de orientacion, sino tambien en censores que ocultan una parte de la verdad y obstaculizan el avance cientifico para defender el interes economico de sus patentes. EnglishThe journals are basically the only channel through the scientists can make the result of their research know to their colleagues. Scientific journals select the information they publish and guarantee its quality by means of a double blind procedure of censorship by peers. If on the one hand this procedure seems logical as a method for including a study within a consolidated scientific field it is also true that it can function as a mechanism for censorship. If, furthermore, a scientific field such as pharmacology is intimately linked to the business interest of large companies then the companies and journals not only became providers of guidance, but also censors who conceal part of the truth and obstruct scientific advance to defend the economic interest of their patents.
疯狂与文本:精神病学论文作为一种商业和一种审查手段
西班牙杂志基本上是科学家们使其研究结果为同事所知的唯一渠道。科学杂志选择他们发布的信息,并通过同行审查的双盲程序确保其质量。一方面,如果这一程序作为一种将研究纳入巩固科学领域的方法似乎合乎逻辑,那么它也可以作为审查机制发挥作用。此外,如果药理学等科学领域与大公司的商业利益密切相关,公司和杂志不仅成为指导提供者,而且成为隐瞒部分真相并阻碍科学进步以捍卫其专利的经济利益的审查员。英文期刊基本上是科学家能够将研究结果告知同事的唯一渠道。科学期刊选择他们发布的信息,并通过同行审查的双重盲程序保证其质量。如果一方面,这一程序似乎是一种合乎逻辑的方法,可以将研究纳入一个巩固的科学领域,那么它也可以作为一种审查机制发挥作用。此外,如果药理学等科学领域与大公司的商业利益密切相关,那么公司和期刊不仅成为指导提供者,而且成为隐瞒部分真相并阻碍科学进步以捍卫其专利经济利益的审查员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信