An evaluation of the Stratford multiagency, multidisciplinary, assessment clinic

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
C. Cooper, H. Liu, Tobias A. Rowland, Riddhi Prajapati, Tayla Hurlock, A. Owen
{"title":"An evaluation of the Stratford multiagency, multidisciplinary, assessment clinic","authors":"C. Cooper, H. Liu, Tobias A. Rowland, Riddhi Prajapati, Tayla Hurlock, A. Owen","doi":"10.1108/mhrj-02-2021-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to assess a novel clinic whereby new patients were discussed in a multi-agency, multi-disciplinary panel and given feedback on the same day. The objectives were to determine the impacts on time to commencing treatment, need for further assessment, discharges and staff and patient experiences.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nOutcomes from the new assessment clinic were compared to previous individual assessments. Feedback questionnaires were given to patients, while a focus group was conducted with staff.\n\n\nFindings\nThere was a significant reduction in the time to agreeing a treatment plan (34 days to <1 day), the need for further assessment (61%–23.2%) and a significant increase in the proportion discharged from secondary care (26.9%–49.8%). Clinician and patient feedback on the clinic was positive.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe model of a multi-agency, multi-disciplinary clinic could be used for assessing new referrals to community mental health teams.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe use of a multi-agency, multi-disciplinary clinic is a novel approach within community mental health teams which led to improvements in efficiency, while demonstrating positive patient and clinician feedback.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-02-2021-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to assess a novel clinic whereby new patients were discussed in a multi-agency, multi-disciplinary panel and given feedback on the same day. The objectives were to determine the impacts on time to commencing treatment, need for further assessment, discharges and staff and patient experiences. Design/methodology/approach Outcomes from the new assessment clinic were compared to previous individual assessments. Feedback questionnaires were given to patients, while a focus group was conducted with staff. Findings There was a significant reduction in the time to agreeing a treatment plan (34 days to <1 day), the need for further assessment (61%–23.2%) and a significant increase in the proportion discharged from secondary care (26.9%–49.8%). Clinician and patient feedback on the clinic was positive. Practical implications The model of a multi-agency, multi-disciplinary clinic could be used for assessing new referrals to community mental health teams. Originality/value The use of a multi-agency, multi-disciplinary clinic is a novel approach within community mental health teams which led to improvements in efficiency, while demonstrating positive patient and clinician feedback.
斯特拉特福德多机构、多学科评估诊所的评估
目的本研究旨在评估一家新诊所,在该诊所中,新患者在多机构、多学科小组中进行讨论,并在同一天得到反馈。目的是确定对开始治疗的时间、进一步评估的必要性、出院以及工作人员和患者体验的影响。设计/方法/方法将新评估诊所的结果与以前的个人评估进行比较。向患者发放了反馈问卷,并与工作人员一起进行了重点小组讨论。发现达成治疗计划的时间显著缩短(34 天至<1天),需要进一步评估(61%-23.2%),从二级护理出院的比例显著增加(26.9%-49.8%)。临床医生和患者对诊所的反馈是积极的。实际意义多机构、多学科诊所的模式可用于评估社区心理健康团队的新转诊。独创性/价值使用多机构、多学科诊所是社区心理健康团队中的一种新方法,它提高了效率,同时展示了患者和临床医生的积极反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信