Manufacturing technique and social identity: three cases of ‘manufacture-by-wear’ technique

IF 0.7 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
M. Mărgărit, Pavel Mirea, A. Bălășescu
{"title":"Manufacturing technique and social identity: three cases of ‘manufacture-by-wear’ technique","authors":"M. Mărgărit, Pavel Mirea, A. Bălășescu","doi":"10.15366/ARCHAEOFAUNA2018.27.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on the identification of changes in the processing of osse- ous materials in the southeast European Neolithic, beginning with three types of production by manufacture wear technique typical for the region: bipartition by abrasion, segmentation with fibre and perforation by wear technique. The processing of osseous materials is strongly conditioned by their natural anatomic shapes which is why only a restricted range of possible transformation variables, with minimum changes through time, would be expected. However, numerous specialists invoke the cultural value conferred by the community as the preeminent element in the selection of raw material more than the limitations of the raw material form. Therefore, there are some examples in which there was little change in raw materials selec- tion across long periods of time, although there was variation in animal species availability. Consequently, the study of the three types of ‘manufacture-by-wear’ technique becomes more interesting. These techniques are not present in all prehistoric times in this region. Some of these techniques appear on worked osseous materials in Romania and neighbouring areas at the beginning of the Neolithic and disappear just as suddenly (bipartition by abrasion) or appear only sporadically (perforation and segmentation with fibre) by the Early Chalcolithic. Based on experimental reconstructions of the three processing techniques and comparing them with archaeological assemblages, our study aims to register all the relevant variables (technological gestures, time required for each operation, tools used etc.), and evaluate if they represented a real innovation in the way which the osseous materials were processed.\n \n ","PeriodicalId":44490,"journal":{"name":"ARCHAEOFAUNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15366/ARCHAEOFAUNA2018.27.011","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHAEOFAUNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/ARCHAEOFAUNA2018.27.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper focuses on the identification of changes in the processing of osse- ous materials in the southeast European Neolithic, beginning with three types of production by manufacture wear technique typical for the region: bipartition by abrasion, segmentation with fibre and perforation by wear technique. The processing of osseous materials is strongly conditioned by their natural anatomic shapes which is why only a restricted range of possible transformation variables, with minimum changes through time, would be expected. However, numerous specialists invoke the cultural value conferred by the community as the preeminent element in the selection of raw material more than the limitations of the raw material form. Therefore, there are some examples in which there was little change in raw materials selec- tion across long periods of time, although there was variation in animal species availability. Consequently, the study of the three types of ‘manufacture-by-wear’ technique becomes more interesting. These techniques are not present in all prehistoric times in this region. Some of these techniques appear on worked osseous materials in Romania and neighbouring areas at the beginning of the Neolithic and disappear just as suddenly (bipartition by abrasion) or appear only sporadically (perforation and segmentation with fibre) by the Early Chalcolithic. Based on experimental reconstructions of the three processing techniques and comparing them with archaeological assemblages, our study aims to register all the relevant variables (technological gestures, time required for each operation, tools used etc.), and evaluate if they represented a real innovation in the way which the osseous materials were processed.    
制造技术与社会认同:“穿著制造”技术的三个案例
本文着重于鉴定欧洲东南部新石器时代骨料加工的变化,从该地区典型的三种制造磨损技术生产开始:磨损的双分割,纤维分割和磨损技术的穿孔。骨材料的加工受到其自然解剖形状的强烈制约,这就是为什么只有有限范围的可能的转换变量,随着时间的推移,变化最小。然而,许多专家认为,在选择原材料时,社区赋予的文化价值比原材料形式的限制更重要。因此,有一些例子表明,在很长一段时间内,原材料的选择几乎没有变化,尽管在动物物种的可用性方面存在变化。因此,对三种“按磨损制造”技术的研究变得更加有趣。这些技术在这个地区的所有史前时期都不存在。其中一些技术出现在罗马尼亚和邻近地区新石器时代初期的加工骨材料上,但在早期铜石器时代也同样突然消失(磨损造成的两部分),或者只是偶尔出现(用纤维穿孔和分割)。基于对三种加工技术的实验重建,并将其与考古组合进行比较,我们的研究旨在记录所有相关变量(技术手势、每次操作所需的时间、使用的工具等),并评估它们是否代表了骨材料加工方式的真正创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARCHAEOFAUNA
ARCHAEOFAUNA ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ARCHAEOFAUNA publica trabajos originales relacionados con cualquier aspecto del estudio de restos animales recuperados en yacimientos arqueológicos.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信