Temporomandibular disorder and headache prevalence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Q3 Medicine
Pankaew Yakkaphan, Jared G. Smith, P. Chana, T. Renton, G. Lambru
{"title":"Temporomandibular disorder and headache prevalence: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Pankaew Yakkaphan, Jared G. Smith, P. Chana, T. Renton, G. Lambru","doi":"10.1177/25158163221097352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and headaches are prevalent among the global population. Patients often suffer from both conditions, and they are likely to be associated in a bidirectional way. However, the nature of the association remains unclear. Understanding the epidemiological aspects of the relationship between these conditions could have important clinical implications. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of headaches in TMD patients as well as the prevalence of TMD in patients who suffer from headaches. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted using electronic databases. Studies published in English and those that used an acknowledged diagnostic criteria for TMD and headaches were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and meta-analyses were performed to generate pooled prevalence estimates. Result: Thirty-one studies met the selection criteria for the review; 16 studies evaluated the prevalence of headache in TMD patients and 15 studies evaluated the prevalence of TMD in headache patients. The included studies were of moderate-to-high quality. Meta-analyses revealed moderate-to-large heterogeneities across included studies. Pooled prevalence estimates from meta-analyses indicated similar rates of headaches in TMD patients and of TMD in headache patients (61.58%, 95% CI 45.26–76.66 and 59.42%, 95% CI 51.93–66.60, respectively). Migraines were more commonly observed in TMD patients (40.25%, 95% CI 35.37–45.23) compared to tension-type headaches (18.89%, 95% CI 12.36–26.44). The prevalence of headaches was particularly high in painful-TMD (82.80%, 95% CI 75.41–89.10). Conclusion: Despite large variance in prevalence rates across included studies, this review suggests headache and TMD frequently co-occur, particularly in the case of migraines and muscle related TMD. This association has important clinical, pathophysiological and therapeutic implications.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158163221097352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and headaches are prevalent among the global population. Patients often suffer from both conditions, and they are likely to be associated in a bidirectional way. However, the nature of the association remains unclear. Understanding the epidemiological aspects of the relationship between these conditions could have important clinical implications. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of headaches in TMD patients as well as the prevalence of TMD in patients who suffer from headaches. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted using electronic databases. Studies published in English and those that used an acknowledged diagnostic criteria for TMD and headaches were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and meta-analyses were performed to generate pooled prevalence estimates. Result: Thirty-one studies met the selection criteria for the review; 16 studies evaluated the prevalence of headache in TMD patients and 15 studies evaluated the prevalence of TMD in headache patients. The included studies were of moderate-to-high quality. Meta-analyses revealed moderate-to-large heterogeneities across included studies. Pooled prevalence estimates from meta-analyses indicated similar rates of headaches in TMD patients and of TMD in headache patients (61.58%, 95% CI 45.26–76.66 and 59.42%, 95% CI 51.93–66.60, respectively). Migraines were more commonly observed in TMD patients (40.25%, 95% CI 35.37–45.23) compared to tension-type headaches (18.89%, 95% CI 12.36–26.44). The prevalence of headaches was particularly high in painful-TMD (82.80%, 95% CI 75.41–89.10). Conclusion: Despite large variance in prevalence rates across included studies, this review suggests headache and TMD frequently co-occur, particularly in the case of migraines and muscle related TMD. This association has important clinical, pathophysiological and therapeutic implications.
颞下颌关节紊乱与头痛患病率的系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)和头痛在全球人群中普遍存在。患者通常同时患有这两种疾病,并且它们可能以双向的方式联系在一起。然而,该协会的性质仍不清楚。了解这些疾病之间关系的流行病学方面可能具有重要的临床意义。目的:评估TMD患者头痛的患病率以及头痛患者TMD的患病率。方法:使用电子数据库进行系统的文献检索。以英语发表的研究以及那些使用公认的TMD和头痛诊断标准的研究也包括在内。使用Newcastle Ottawa量表评估研究质量,并进行荟萃分析以生成汇总的患病率估计值。结果:31项研究符合审查的选择标准;16项研究评估了TMD患者头痛的患病率,15项研究评估头痛患者TMD的患病率。纳入的研究质量中等至较高。荟萃分析显示,纳入研究中存在中度至重度异质性。荟萃分析的综合患病率估计表明,TMD患者的头痛发生率和头痛患者的TMD发生率相似(分别为61.58%,95%CI 45.26-76.66和59.42%,95%CI 51.93-66.60)。与紧张型头痛(18.89%,95%CI 12.36–26.44)相比,偏头痛在TMD患者中更常见(40.25%,95%CI 35.37–45.23)。疼痛性TMD患者的头痛患病率特别高(82.80%,95%CI 75.41–89.10)。结论:尽管纳入研究的患病率差异很大,但本综述表明头痛和TMD经常同时发生,特别是在偏头痛和肌肉相关TMD的情况下。这种关联具有重要的临床、病理生理和治疗意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia Reports
Cephalalgia Reports Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信