Production of tomato cultivated in different nutritive solutions

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Marcos Antônio Turchiello, A. D. Lúcio, Rodrigo Godoi, Ana Lúcia de Paula Ribeiro, André Fontana Weber
{"title":"Production of tomato cultivated in different nutritive solutions","authors":"Marcos Antônio Turchiello, A. D. Lúcio, Rodrigo Godoi, Ana Lúcia de Paula Ribeiro, André Fontana Weber","doi":"10.14295/cs.v14.3642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective this paper is determine the highest performance of fresh mass and number of fruits in tomato crops using different nutrient solution. An absolute hybrid with a semi-determined growth was used. It was grown in a protected environment using a fertigated substrate inside plastic bags containing ten liters of solution. The experiment was completely randomized with four levels of fertilization and five replications. Two experiments were carried out in two cultivation cycles (spring 2018 and autumn 2019) by performing an analysis of variance and Scott & Knott test and estimating the parameters of nonlinear logistic model and its critical points for both variables in each treatment. The mean fruit mass per plant was 3.70 kg for the spring experiment and 3.80 kg for the autumn experiment. The mean number of fruits per plant was 10.50 and 10.70 fruits for spring and autumn, respectively. There are significant differences between the treatments KO46, KO45 and KO56 compared to KO69 for fruit mass in the autumn experiment. For the other variables and cultivation cycles, the treatments did not show statistical differences. The logistic growth model fitted the weight and number of tomato fruits according to days after transplanting the seedlings and evidenced production cycle data, highlighting the main differences between the nutrient solutions. The nutritional solutions KO46, KO45 and KO56 are recommended for growing Gaúcho tomatoes in substrate. The nutrient solution KO56 has the best performance because it has a higher K availability, meets the balance of loads and antagonism between nutrients, provides equal response of means mass and number of fruits, and has a lower N:K ratio and balance of K over Ca and Mg, thus favoring fruit production, precocity, and development.","PeriodicalId":38570,"journal":{"name":"Comunicata Scientiae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comunicata Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14295/cs.v14.3642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective this paper is determine the highest performance of fresh mass and number of fruits in tomato crops using different nutrient solution. An absolute hybrid with a semi-determined growth was used. It was grown in a protected environment using a fertigated substrate inside plastic bags containing ten liters of solution. The experiment was completely randomized with four levels of fertilization and five replications. Two experiments were carried out in two cultivation cycles (spring 2018 and autumn 2019) by performing an analysis of variance and Scott & Knott test and estimating the parameters of nonlinear logistic model and its critical points for both variables in each treatment. The mean fruit mass per plant was 3.70 kg for the spring experiment and 3.80 kg for the autumn experiment. The mean number of fruits per plant was 10.50 and 10.70 fruits for spring and autumn, respectively. There are significant differences between the treatments KO46, KO45 and KO56 compared to KO69 for fruit mass in the autumn experiment. For the other variables and cultivation cycles, the treatments did not show statistical differences. The logistic growth model fitted the weight and number of tomato fruits according to days after transplanting the seedlings and evidenced production cycle data, highlighting the main differences between the nutrient solutions. The nutritional solutions KO46, KO45 and KO56 are recommended for growing Gaúcho tomatoes in substrate. The nutrient solution KO56 has the best performance because it has a higher K availability, meets the balance of loads and antagonism between nutrients, provides equal response of means mass and number of fruits, and has a lower N:K ratio and balance of K over Ca and Mg, thus favoring fruit production, precocity, and development.
不同营养液栽培番茄的生产
研究了不同营养液对番茄鲜果质量和果实数量的影响。采用半确定生长的绝对杂交。它是在一个受保护的环境中生长的,使用的是一个装有10升溶液的塑料袋里的肥沃基质。试验完全随机化,4个施肥水平,5个重复。通过方差分析和Scott & Knott检验,在两个栽培周期(2018年春季和2019年秋季)进行了两个试验,并估计了每个处理中两个变量的非线性逻辑模型参数及其临界点。单株平均果实质量春季试验为3.70 kg,秋季试验为3.80 kg。春季和秋季平均单株果实数分别为10.50和10.70个。在秋季试验中,KO46、KO45和KO56处理的果实质量与KO69处理相比有显著差异。对于其他变量和培养周期,处理间无统计学差异。logistic生长模型根据移栽后的天数和生产周期数据拟合番茄果实的重量和数量,突出了营养液之间的主要差异。建议使用KO46、KO45和KO56营养液在基质中种植Gaúcho番茄。KO56营养液表现最好,因为它具有较高的钾效价,满足养分间的负荷平衡和拮抗作用,对平均质量和果实数量的响应相等,且具有较低的N:K比和钾钙镁平衡,有利于果实的生产、早熟和发育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comunicata Scientiae
Comunicata Scientiae Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Comunicata Scientiae journal edited by Campus “Profa Cinobelina Elvas” of Federal University of Piauí (Brazil) publishes original articles, scientific notes and review articles (when invited by the editorial board), which present significant importance for Agrarian and Environmental Sciences in Portuguese, Spanish and preferentially, in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信