‘My devil womb’: Patients’ perspectives on, and understanding of, endometriosis: An observational cross-sectional study

IF 0.6 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nadine Chilton, S. van Oudtshoorn, J. Pontré, K. Karthigasu, B. Mcelhinney
{"title":"‘My devil womb’: Patients’ perspectives on, and understanding of, endometriosis: An observational cross-sectional study","authors":"Nadine Chilton, S. van Oudtshoorn, J. Pontré, K. Karthigasu, B. Mcelhinney","doi":"10.1177/22840265211034092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To gain insight into patients’ understanding of endometriosis, utilised sources of information on endometriosis and perceptions of available treatment options. Design: Observational cross-sectional study. Setting: Data were collected from an outpatient specialist endometriosis clinic within a tertiary hospital. Participants: New patients referred with symptoms suggestive of endometriosis. Methods: A paper based questionnaire was completed by new patients on their first presentation to the clinic. Main outcome measures: Patient understanding of symptoms and causes of endometriosis, types and expectations of treatment, and sources of information utilised by patients in researching endometriosis. Results: Approximately half of all included patients were unsure of the aetiology of endometriosis. Patients who relied on information from specialist gynaecologists were more optimistic about the outcome of surgical treatment, while those who relied on general practitioners were more optimistic about the outcome of medical treatment, when compared to those who sought information from online sources. Conclusions: Endometriosis is a chronic and debilitating condition, yet there is limited data available regarding both the sources of information that patients’ access, and their perceptions of the disease. Given the high proportion of patients in our study who lacked knowledge of endometriosis, and the negative correlation between the use of social media for information and perception of treatment, there is a clear need for improved access to evidence-based resources for patient education.","PeriodicalId":15725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","volume":"13 1","pages":"223 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/22840265211034092","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22840265211034092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To gain insight into patients’ understanding of endometriosis, utilised sources of information on endometriosis and perceptions of available treatment options. Design: Observational cross-sectional study. Setting: Data were collected from an outpatient specialist endometriosis clinic within a tertiary hospital. Participants: New patients referred with symptoms suggestive of endometriosis. Methods: A paper based questionnaire was completed by new patients on their first presentation to the clinic. Main outcome measures: Patient understanding of symptoms and causes of endometriosis, types and expectations of treatment, and sources of information utilised by patients in researching endometriosis. Results: Approximately half of all included patients were unsure of the aetiology of endometriosis. Patients who relied on information from specialist gynaecologists were more optimistic about the outcome of surgical treatment, while those who relied on general practitioners were more optimistic about the outcome of medical treatment, when compared to those who sought information from online sources. Conclusions: Endometriosis is a chronic and debilitating condition, yet there is limited data available regarding both the sources of information that patients’ access, and their perceptions of the disease. Given the high proportion of patients in our study who lacked knowledge of endometriosis, and the negative correlation between the use of social media for information and perception of treatment, there is a clear need for improved access to evidence-based resources for patient education.
“我的魔鬼子宫”:患者对子宫内膜异位症的看法和理解:一项观察性横断面研究
目的:了解患者对子宫内膜异位症的认识,利用子宫内膜异位症的信息来源和对可用治疗方案的看法。设计:观察性横断面研究。环境:数据收集于一家三级医院的门诊专家子宫内膜异位症诊所。参与者:有子宫内膜异位症症状的新患者。方法:对首次就诊的新患者进行问卷调查。主要结果测量:患者对子宫内膜异位症的症状和原因、治疗类型和期望的了解,以及患者在研究子宫内膜异位症时利用的信息来源。结果:大约一半的患者不确定子宫内膜异位症的病因。与从网上获取信息的患者相比,依赖妇科专家信息的患者对手术治疗的结果更为乐观,而依赖全科医生信息的患者对医疗结果更为乐观。结论:子宫内膜异位症是一种慢性衰弱性疾病,但关于患者可获得的信息来源和他们对疾病的看法的数据有限。考虑到在我们的研究中有很高比例的患者缺乏对子宫内膜异位症的知识,以及使用社交媒体获取信息与对治疗的认知之间的负相关,显然需要改善对患者教育的循证资源的获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信