Four priority areas to advance invasion science in the face of rapid environmental change

IF 4.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
A. Ricciardi, Josephine C. Iacarella, D. Aldridge, T. Blackburn, J. Carlton, J. Catford, J. Dick, P. Hulme, J. Jeschke, Andrew M. Liebhold, J. Lockwood, H. MacIsaac, L. Meyerson, P. Pyšek, D. Richardson, G. Ruiz, D. Simberloff, M. Vilà, D. Wardle
{"title":"Four priority areas to advance invasion science in the face of rapid environmental change","authors":"A. Ricciardi, Josephine C. Iacarella, D. Aldridge, T. Blackburn, J. Carlton, J. Catford, J. Dick, P. Hulme, J. Jeschke, Andrew M. Liebhold, J. Lockwood, H. MacIsaac, L. Meyerson, P. Pyšek, D. Richardson, G. Ruiz, D. Simberloff, M. Vilà, D. Wardle","doi":"10.1139/er-2020-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unprecedented rates of introduction and spread of non-native species pose burgeoning challenges to biodiversity, natural resource management, regional economies, and human health. Current biosecurity efforts are failing to keep pace with globalization, revealing critical gaps in our understanding and response to invasions. Here, we identify four priority areas to advance invasion science in the face of rapid global environmental change. First, invasion science should strive to develop a more comprehensive framework for predicting how the behavior, abundance, and interspecific interactions of non-native species vary in relation to conditions in receiving environments and how these factors govern the ecological impacts of invasion. A second priority is to understand the potential synergistic effects of multiple co-occurring stressors— particularly involving climate change—on the establishment and impact of non-native species. Climate adaptation and mitigation strategies will need to consider the possible consequences of promoting non-native species, and appropriate management responses to non-native species will need to be developed. The third priority is to address the taxonomic impediment. The ability to detect and evaluate invasion risks is compromised by a growing deficit in taxonomic expertise, which cannot be adequately compensated by new molecular technologies alone. Management of biosecurity risks will become increasingly challenging unless academia, industry, and governments train and employ new personnel in taxonomy and systematics. Fourth, we recommend that internationally cooperative biosecurity strategies consider the bridgehead effects of global dispersal networks, in which organisms tend to invade new regions from locations where they have already established. Cooperation among countries to eradicate or control species established in bridgehead regions should yield greater benefit than independent attempts by individual countries to exclude these species from arriving and establishing.","PeriodicalId":50514,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"79","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2020-0088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 79

Abstract

Unprecedented rates of introduction and spread of non-native species pose burgeoning challenges to biodiversity, natural resource management, regional economies, and human health. Current biosecurity efforts are failing to keep pace with globalization, revealing critical gaps in our understanding and response to invasions. Here, we identify four priority areas to advance invasion science in the face of rapid global environmental change. First, invasion science should strive to develop a more comprehensive framework for predicting how the behavior, abundance, and interspecific interactions of non-native species vary in relation to conditions in receiving environments and how these factors govern the ecological impacts of invasion. A second priority is to understand the potential synergistic effects of multiple co-occurring stressors— particularly involving climate change—on the establishment and impact of non-native species. Climate adaptation and mitigation strategies will need to consider the possible consequences of promoting non-native species, and appropriate management responses to non-native species will need to be developed. The third priority is to address the taxonomic impediment. The ability to detect and evaluate invasion risks is compromised by a growing deficit in taxonomic expertise, which cannot be adequately compensated by new molecular technologies alone. Management of biosecurity risks will become increasingly challenging unless academia, industry, and governments train and employ new personnel in taxonomy and systematics. Fourth, we recommend that internationally cooperative biosecurity strategies consider the bridgehead effects of global dispersal networks, in which organisms tend to invade new regions from locations where they have already established. Cooperation among countries to eradicate or control species established in bridgehead regions should yield greater benefit than independent attempts by individual countries to exclude these species from arriving and establishing.
面对快速的环境变化,推进入侵科学的四个优先领域
非本土物种前所未有的引入和传播速度对生物多样性、自然资源管理、区域经济和人类健康构成了日益严峻的挑战。目前的生物安全努力未能跟上全球化的步伐,暴露出我们在理解和应对入侵方面存在重大差距。在这里,我们确定了在全球环境快速变化的情况下推进入侵科学的四个优先领域。首先,入侵科学应该努力开发一个更全面的框架来预测非本土物种的行为、丰度和种间相互作用如何随着接收环境的条件而变化,以及这些因素如何控制入侵的生态影响。第二个优先事项是了解多种同时发生的压力源——特别是涉及气候变化——对非本土物种的建立和影响的潜在协同效应。气候适应和缓解战略需要考虑促进非本土物种可能产生的后果,需要制定针对非本土物种的适当管理对策。第三个优先事项是解决分类学障碍。分类学专业知识的日益不足损害了检测和评估入侵风险的能力,仅靠新的分子技术无法充分弥补这一不足。除非学术界、工业界和政府培训和雇用分类学和系统学方面的新人员,否则生物安全风险的管理将变得越来越具有挑战性。第四,我们建议国际合作生物安全战略考虑全球扩散网络的桥头堡效应,在全球扩散网络中,生物往往会从它们已经建立的地方入侵新的区域。各国为根除或控制在桥头堡地区建立的物种而进行的合作,应该比个别国家将这些物种排除在外的独立尝试产生更大的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Reviews
Environmental Reviews 环境科学-环境科学
自引率
3.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Published since 1993, Environmental Reviews is a quarterly journal that presents authoritative literature reviews on a wide range of environmental science and associated environmental studies topics, with emphasis on the effects on and response of both natural and manmade ecosystems to anthropogenic stress. The authorship and scope are international, with critical literature reviews submitted and invited on such topics as sustainability, water supply management, climate change, harvesting impacts, acid rain, pesticide use, lake acidification, air and marine pollution, oil and gas development, biological control, food chain biomagnification, rehabilitation of polluted aquatic systems, erosion, forestry, bio-indicators of environmental stress, conservation of biodiversity, and many other environmental issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信