Winter Storm Uri: A Test of Texas’ Water Infrastructure and Water Resource Resilience to Extreme Winter Weather Events

Y. R. Glazer, D. Tremaine, J. Banner, M. Cook, R. Mace, J. Nielsen‐Gammon, E. Grubert, K. Kramer, A. Stoner, Briana M. Wyatt, A. Mayer, T. Beach, Rachel M. Correll, M. Webber
{"title":"Winter Storm Uri: A Test of Texas’ Water Infrastructure and Water Resource Resilience to Extreme Winter Weather Events","authors":"Y. R. Glazer, D. Tremaine, J. Banner, M. Cook, R. Mace, J. Nielsen‐Gammon, E. Grubert, K. Kramer, A. Stoner, Briana M. Wyatt, A. Mayer, T. Beach, Rachel M. Correll, M. Webber","doi":"10.1142/s2345737621500226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We synthesize the interconnected impacts of Texas’ water and energy resources and infrastructure including the cascading effects due to Winter Storm Uri. The government’s preparedness, communication, policies, and response as well as storm impacts on vulnerable communities are evaluated using available information and data. Where knowledge gaps exist, we propose potential research to elucidate health, environmental, policy, and economic impacts of the extreme weather event. We expect that recommendations made here — while specific to the situation and outcomes of Winter Storm Uri — will increase Texas’ resilience to other extreme weather events not discussed in this paper. We found that out of 14 million residents who were on boil water notices, those who were served by very small water systems went, on average, a minimum of three days longer without potable water. Available county-level data do not indicate vulnerable communities went longer periods of time without power or water during the event. More resolved data are required to understand who was most heavily impacted at the community or neighborhood level. Gaps in government communication, response, and policy are discussed, including issues with identifying — and securing power to — critical infrastructure and the fact that the state’s Emergency Alert System was not used consistently to update Texans during the crisis. Finally, research recommendations are made to bolster weaknesses discovered during and after the storm including (1) reliable communication strategies, (2) reducing disproportionate impacts to vulnerable communities, (3) human health impacts, (4) increasing water infrastructure resilience, and (5) how climate change could impact infrastructure resilience into the future.","PeriodicalId":73748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of extreme events","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of extreme events","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345737621500226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

We synthesize the interconnected impacts of Texas’ water and energy resources and infrastructure including the cascading effects due to Winter Storm Uri. The government’s preparedness, communication, policies, and response as well as storm impacts on vulnerable communities are evaluated using available information and data. Where knowledge gaps exist, we propose potential research to elucidate health, environmental, policy, and economic impacts of the extreme weather event. We expect that recommendations made here — while specific to the situation and outcomes of Winter Storm Uri — will increase Texas’ resilience to other extreme weather events not discussed in this paper. We found that out of 14 million residents who were on boil water notices, those who were served by very small water systems went, on average, a minimum of three days longer without potable water. Available county-level data do not indicate vulnerable communities went longer periods of time without power or water during the event. More resolved data are required to understand who was most heavily impacted at the community or neighborhood level. Gaps in government communication, response, and policy are discussed, including issues with identifying — and securing power to — critical infrastructure and the fact that the state’s Emergency Alert System was not used consistently to update Texans during the crisis. Finally, research recommendations are made to bolster weaknesses discovered during and after the storm including (1) reliable communication strategies, (2) reducing disproportionate impacts to vulnerable communities, (3) human health impacts, (4) increasing water infrastructure resilience, and (5) how climate change could impact infrastructure resilience into the future.
冬季风暴乌里:对德克萨斯州水基础设施和水资源对极端冬季天气事件的抵御能力的测试
我们综合了德克萨斯州的水和能源资源以及基础设施的相互影响,包括冬季风暴Uri的级联效应。利用现有信息和数据评估政府的准备、沟通、政策和应对以及风暴对脆弱社区的影响。在存在知识缺口的地方,我们建议进行潜在的研究,以阐明极端天气事件对健康、环境、政策和经济的影响。我们期望这里提出的建议——虽然具体针对“乌里”冬季风暴的情况和结果——将提高德克萨斯州对本文未讨论的其他极端天气事件的适应能力。我们发现,在1400万接到烧开水通知的居民中,那些供水系统非常小的居民,平均至少有三天没有饮用水。现有的县级数据并没有表明脆弱社区在地震期间断电或断水的时间更长。要了解谁在社区或邻里一级受到了最严重的影响,需要更多的确定数据。讨论了政府沟通、反应和政策方面的差距,包括识别和确保关键基础设施供电的问题,以及该州紧急警报系统在危机期间没有持续使用来更新德州人的情况。最后,提出了研究建议,以加强在风暴期间和之后发现的弱点,包括(1)可靠的沟通策略,(2)减少对脆弱社区的不成比例的影响,(3)人类健康影响,(4)提高水基础设施的恢复能力,以及(5)气候变化如何影响未来的基础设施恢复能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信