Detecting and modeling critical dependence structures between random inputs of computer models

IF 0.6 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
N. Benoumechiara, N. Bousquet, B. Michel, Philippe Saint-Pierre
{"title":"Detecting and modeling critical dependence structures between random inputs of computer models","authors":"N. Benoumechiara, N. Bousquet, B. Michel, Philippe Saint-Pierre","doi":"10.1515/demo-2020-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Uncertain information on input parameters of computer models is usually modeled by considering these parameters as random, and described by marginal distributions and a dependence structure of these variables. In numerous real-world applications, while information is mainly provided by marginal distributions, typically from samples, little is really known on the dependence structure itself. Faced with this problem of incomplete or missing information, risk studies that make use of these computer models are often conducted by considering independence of input variables, at the risk of including irrelevant situations. This approach is especially used when reliability functions are considered as black-box models. Such analyses remain weakened in absence of in-depth model exploration, at the possible price of a strong risk misestimation. Considering the frequent case where the reliability output is a quantile, this article provides a methodology to improve risk assessment, by exploring a set of pessimistic dependencies using a copula-based strategy. In dimension greater than two, a greedy algorithm is provided to build input regular vine copulas reaching a minimum quantile to which a reliability admissible limit value can be compared, by selecting pairwise components of sensitive influence on the result. The strategy is tested over toy models and a real industrial case-study. The results highlight that current approaches can provide non-conservative results.","PeriodicalId":43690,"journal":{"name":"Dependence Modeling","volume":"8 1","pages":"263 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/demo-2020-0016","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dependence Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/demo-2020-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Uncertain information on input parameters of computer models is usually modeled by considering these parameters as random, and described by marginal distributions and a dependence structure of these variables. In numerous real-world applications, while information is mainly provided by marginal distributions, typically from samples, little is really known on the dependence structure itself. Faced with this problem of incomplete or missing information, risk studies that make use of these computer models are often conducted by considering independence of input variables, at the risk of including irrelevant situations. This approach is especially used when reliability functions are considered as black-box models. Such analyses remain weakened in absence of in-depth model exploration, at the possible price of a strong risk misestimation. Considering the frequent case where the reliability output is a quantile, this article provides a methodology to improve risk assessment, by exploring a set of pessimistic dependencies using a copula-based strategy. In dimension greater than two, a greedy algorithm is provided to build input regular vine copulas reaching a minimum quantile to which a reliability admissible limit value can be compared, by selecting pairwise components of sensitive influence on the result. The strategy is tested over toy models and a real industrial case-study. The results highlight that current approaches can provide non-conservative results.
计算机模型随机输入之间的临界依赖结构的检测和建模
摘要计算机模型输入参数的不确定性信息通常通过将这些参数视为随机来建模,并通过这些变量的边际分布和依赖结构来描述。在许多现实世界的应用中,虽然信息主要由边际分布提供,通常来自样本,但对依赖结构本身知之甚少。面对信息不完整或缺失的问题,利用这些计算机模型进行的风险研究往往是考虑输入变量的独立性,冒着包括不相关情况的风险。当可靠性函数被视为黑盒模型时,这种方法尤其适用。在缺乏深入的模型探索的情况下,这种分析仍然被削弱,可能会以强烈的风险估计失误为代价。考虑到可靠性输出是分位数的常见情况,本文通过使用基于copula的策略探索一组悲观依赖关系,提供了一种改进风险评估的方法。在大于2的维度中,通过选择对结果有敏感影响的成对分量,提供了一种贪婪算法来构建达到可与可靠性容许极限值进行比较的最小分位数的输入正则藤Copula。该策略在玩具模型和一个真实的工业案例研究中进行了测试。研究结果强调,目前的方法可以提供非保守的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dependence Modeling
Dependence Modeling STATISTICS & PROBABILITY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Dependence Modeling aims at providing a medium for exchanging results and ideas in the area of multivariate dependence modeling. It is an open access fully peer-reviewed journal providing the readers with free, instant, and permanent access to all content worldwide. Dependence Modeling is listed by Web of Science (Emerging Sources Citation Index), Scopus, MathSciNet and Zentralblatt Math. The journal presents different types of articles: -"Research Articles" on fundamental theoretical aspects, as well as on significant applications in science, engineering, economics, finance, insurance and other fields. -"Review Articles" which present the existing literature on the specific topic from new perspectives. -"Interview articles" limited to two papers per year, covering interviews with milestone personalities in the field of Dependence Modeling. The journal topics include (but are not limited to):  -Copula methods -Multivariate distributions -Estimation and goodness-of-fit tests -Measures of association -Quantitative risk management -Risk measures and stochastic orders -Time series -Environmental sciences -Computational methods and software -Extreme-value theory -Limit laws -Mass Transportations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信