Prediction of mammalian maximal rates of metabolism and Michaelis constants for industrial and environmental compounds: Revisiting four quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) publications

IF 3.1 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Lisa M. Sweeney , Teresa R. Sterner
{"title":"Prediction of mammalian maximal rates of metabolism and Michaelis constants for industrial and environmental compounds: Revisiting four quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) publications","authors":"Lisa M. Sweeney ,&nbsp;Teresa R. Sterner","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traditional in vivo strategies for investigating toxicokinetics can be time consuming, expensive, and often do not directly address species of interest, e.g., humans. As such, conventional approaches for addressing emerging human health risk assessment concerns that rely on toxicokinetic information have been slow and suboptimal. Alternatives to rodent in vivo toxicokinetic studies include in vitro and in silico approaches for estimating toxicokinetic parameters. This paper focuses on quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) that predict both maximal capacity for metabolism (Vmax) and KM (Michaelis constant, or half-maximal concentration for metabolism). The QSARs, identified from four publications, were evaluated using a previously published 10-step work flow. None of the evaluated QSARs in their published forms could be fully validated. Literature review, finding alternative sources of descriptors and identifiers, substitution of correlated descriptors, and use of graphical information allowed the deficiencies to be addressed for QSARs describing alkylbenzenes, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and substrates of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), cytochrome P450 (CYP), and flavin containing monooxygenases (FMO). Ultimately, reliable, well-documented, updated expressions for Vmax and KM (or Vmax/KM) were derived for each source/data set. The smaller data sets tended to have better predictivity, and Vmax was generally more accurately predicted than KM. Comparisons of the QSARs’ source chemicals found limited overlap in source chemicals, but substantial overlap in descriptor domains. In a feasibility case study, applicability of these QSARs to jet fuel components with limited toxicokinetic parameterization was assessed to determine the potential utility for investigation of mixture toxicokinetics. The VOC QSARs and alkylbenzene QSARs were identified as having greater potential to accurately predict in vivo toxicokinetics of the selected jet fuel components than the CYP QSARs, due to the physicochemical characteristics of the chemicals used in their development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100214"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Traditional in vivo strategies for investigating toxicokinetics can be time consuming, expensive, and often do not directly address species of interest, e.g., humans. As such, conventional approaches for addressing emerging human health risk assessment concerns that rely on toxicokinetic information have been slow and suboptimal. Alternatives to rodent in vivo toxicokinetic studies include in vitro and in silico approaches for estimating toxicokinetic parameters. This paper focuses on quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) that predict both maximal capacity for metabolism (Vmax) and KM (Michaelis constant, or half-maximal concentration for metabolism). The QSARs, identified from four publications, were evaluated using a previously published 10-step work flow. None of the evaluated QSARs in their published forms could be fully validated. Literature review, finding alternative sources of descriptors and identifiers, substitution of correlated descriptors, and use of graphical information allowed the deficiencies to be addressed for QSARs describing alkylbenzenes, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and substrates of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), cytochrome P450 (CYP), and flavin containing monooxygenases (FMO). Ultimately, reliable, well-documented, updated expressions for Vmax and KM (or Vmax/KM) were derived for each source/data set. The smaller data sets tended to have better predictivity, and Vmax was generally more accurately predicted than KM. Comparisons of the QSARs’ source chemicals found limited overlap in source chemicals, but substantial overlap in descriptor domains. In a feasibility case study, applicability of these QSARs to jet fuel components with limited toxicokinetic parameterization was assessed to determine the potential utility for investigation of mixture toxicokinetics. The VOC QSARs and alkylbenzene QSARs were identified as having greater potential to accurately predict in vivo toxicokinetics of the selected jet fuel components than the CYP QSARs, due to the physicochemical characteristics of the chemicals used in their development.

预测哺乳动物对工业和环境化合物的最大代谢率和Michaelis常数:回顾四篇定量构效关系(QSAR)出版物
研究毒性动力学的传统体内策略可能耗时,昂贵,并且通常不直接针对感兴趣的物种,例如人类。因此,解决依赖毒物动力学信息的新出现的人类健康风险评估问题的传统方法是缓慢和不理想的。啮齿类动物体内毒性动力学研究的替代方法包括体外和计算机方法,用于估计毒性动力学参数。本文的重点是定量构效关系(QSARs),预测最大代谢能力(Vmax)和KM (Michaelis常数,或半最大代谢浓度)。从四份出版物中确定的QSARs使用先前发布的10步工作流程进行评估。所有已发表的评价QSARs均未得到充分验证。通过文献回顾,寻找描述符和标识符的替代来源,替换相关描述符,以及使用图形信息,可以解决描述烷基苯、挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)以及醇脱氢酶(ADH)、醛脱氢酶(ALDH)、细胞色素P450 (CYP)和含黄素单加氧酶(FMO)底物的qsar的缺陷。最终,为每个源/数据集导出了可靠的、文档完备的、更新的Vmax和KM(或Vmax/KM)表达式。较小的数据集往往具有更好的预测能力,Vmax的预测通常比KM更准确。对QSARs源化学物质的比较发现源化学物质的重叠有限,但在描述域有大量重叠。在可行性案例研究中,评估了这些qsar对具有有限毒性动力学参数化的喷气燃料组分的适用性,以确定混合物毒性动力学研究的潜在效用。由于在开发过程中使用的化学物质的物理化学特性,VOC QSARs和烷基苯QSARs被认为比CYP QSARs更有可能准确预测选定喷气燃料成分的体内毒性动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Toxicology
Computational Toxicology Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Computational Toxicology is an international journal publishing computational approaches that assist in the toxicological evaluation of new and existing chemical substances assisting in their safety assessment. -All effects relating to human health and environmental toxicity and fate -Prediction of toxicity, metabolism, fate and physico-chemical properties -The development of models from read-across, (Q)SARs, PBPK, QIVIVE, Multi-Scale Models -Big Data in toxicology: integration, management, analysis -Implementation of models through AOPs, IATA, TTC -Regulatory acceptance of models: evaluation, verification and validation -From metals, to small organic molecules to nanoparticles -Pharmaceuticals, pesticides, foods, cosmetics, fine chemicals -Bringing together the views of industry, regulators, academia, NGOs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信