BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF Corynespora cassicola AND Drechslera tritici-repentis

IF 0.4 Q4 AGRONOMY
Aveline Avozani, A. Tumelero, Rosane Baldiga Tonin, N. Denardin, Abimael Gomes Silva, F. R. Garcés-Fiallos
{"title":"BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF Corynespora cassicola AND Drechslera tritici-repentis","authors":"Aveline Avozani, A. Tumelero, Rosane Baldiga Tonin, N. Denardin, Abimael Gomes Silva, F. R. Garcés-Fiallos","doi":"10.32404/rean.v9i4.7111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemical control is the most widely used method for disease management in significant crops such as soybeans and wheat. However, for a few years biological control has gained prominence. Thus, we evaluated the antagonism of bacteria Pseudomonas fluorencens, Pantoea aglomerans, and Bacillus sp. on the phytopathogens Corynespora cassiicola and Drechslera tritici-repentis, previously isolated from soybean and wheat leaves, respectively. The experiments were carried out under controlled conditions at the Phytobacteriology Laboratory of the Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine (FAVM), University of Passo Fundo (UPF), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The treatments were: T1: P. Fluorencens + pathogen; T2: P. aglomerans + pathogen; T3: Bacillus spp. + pathogen, and T4: pathogen (control). In each experiment (C. cassiicola and D. tritici-repentis), a completely randomized design with six replications was used. The data were submitted to linear regression analysis, obtaining the daily increase rate (slope). The final time data was submitted to the ANOVA, and the means were compared by the Tukey test (P < 0.05). P. fluorescens, P. agglomerans, and Bacillus sp. reduced mycelial growth by 74 and 87% of C. cassiicola and D. tritici-repentis, respectively. Although this study was carried out under in vitro conditions, it can serve as a basis for other biological control studies, especially about the management of leaf spots caused by C. cassiicola and D. tritici-repentis, under field conditions.","PeriodicalId":55957,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Agricultura Neotropical","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Agricultura Neotropical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v9i4.7111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemical control is the most widely used method for disease management in significant crops such as soybeans and wheat. However, for a few years biological control has gained prominence. Thus, we evaluated the antagonism of bacteria Pseudomonas fluorencens, Pantoea aglomerans, and Bacillus sp. on the phytopathogens Corynespora cassiicola and Drechslera tritici-repentis, previously isolated from soybean and wheat leaves, respectively. The experiments were carried out under controlled conditions at the Phytobacteriology Laboratory of the Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine (FAVM), University of Passo Fundo (UPF), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The treatments were: T1: P. Fluorencens + pathogen; T2: P. aglomerans + pathogen; T3: Bacillus spp. + pathogen, and T4: pathogen (control). In each experiment (C. cassiicola and D. tritici-repentis), a completely randomized design with six replications was used. The data were submitted to linear regression analysis, obtaining the daily increase rate (slope). The final time data was submitted to the ANOVA, and the means were compared by the Tukey test (P < 0.05). P. fluorescens, P. agglomerans, and Bacillus sp. reduced mycelial growth by 74 and 87% of C. cassiicola and D. tritici-repentis, respectively. Although this study was carried out under in vitro conditions, it can serve as a basis for other biological control studies, especially about the management of leaf spots caused by C. cassiicola and D. tritici-repentis, under field conditions.
玉米螟和小锥虫的生物防治
化学防治是大豆和小麦等重要作物病害管理中应用最广泛的方法。然而,近年来,生物防治得到了重视。因此,我们评估了荧光假单胞菌、聚菌泛菌和芽孢杆菌对分别从大豆和小麦叶片中分离到的核桃状芽孢杆菌和小麦状芽孢杆菌的拮抗作用。实验在巴西南大德州帕索丰多大学(UPF)农学和兽医学院(FAVM)植物细菌学实验室受控条件下进行。处理为:T1:荧光假单胞菌+病原菌;T2: P. aglomerans +病原体;T3:芽孢杆菌+病原体,T4:病原体(对照)。在每个实验(C. cassiicola和D. tritric -repentis)中,采用6个重复的完全随机设计。将数据进行线性回归分析,得到日增长率(斜率)。最终时间数据进行方差分析,均数比较采用Tukey检验(P < 0.05)。荧光假单胞菌、团聚假单胞菌和芽孢杆菌分别使仙桃假单胞菌和小麦假单胞菌的菌丝生长减少了74%和87%。虽然本研究是在离体条件下进行的,但可以为其他生物防治研究提供基础,特别是在田间条件下对卡西柯拉和小麦黑斑病的防治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
40
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书