Psychosocial factors influencing distress among cancer patients in South India

S. Veeraiah, K. Kayser, R. Sudhakar
{"title":"Psychosocial factors influencing distress among cancer patients in South India","authors":"S. Veeraiah, K. Kayser, R. Sudhakar","doi":"10.1097/OR9.0000000000000067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The increase of cancer rates in India over the last decade has placed a significant psychosocial burden on patients and their families. To address the psychosocial issues, cancer centers in India have integrated psychosocial services into cancer care by routinely measuring the distress of patients and responding to their distress. In this study, we sought to determine the association between self-reported distress and patient demographic and clinical variables and awareness of their diagnosis and prognosis. Methods: The Department of Psycho-oncology conducted a cross-sectional, cohort study of patients who were being treated for a variety of cancers in a comprehensive cancer center in Chennai, India. Cancer patients (N = 2019) completed a standardized measure of distress and participated in a clinical interview during their admission to a ward or at the time of referral to psycho-oncology. The level of distress was measured by the NCCN Distress Thermometer and problem list. Chi-square tests were used to examine variations in overall distress. Multi-nominal logistic regression analyses were used to assess the level of patients’ reported distress as a function of clinical characteristics (stage of cancer, awareness of diagnosis and prognosis, physical symptoms). Results: The majority (60.3%) of the sample reported a moderate to high level of emotional distress. There were significant associations (P < .05) of younger age, awareness of diagnosis, prognosis, sleep issues, and physical pain with higher levels of distress. Patients who were aware of their diagnoses were more likely to report moderate (P < .01) or severe distress (P < .05) than those who were unaware. Patients who were aware of their prognoses were less likely to report moderate distress (P < .001) and severe distress (P < .001. Implications for Practice and Research: Given that a majority of patients rated at or above the clinical cut-off for distress, oncology centers in India need to provide training for professional psycho-oncology clinicians and incorporate psycho-oncology services to adequately address patients’ distress. Qualitative research may be needed to advance our understanding of specific social and cultural factors that may influence the psychosocial challenges faced by patients. Further investigation of patient distress related to diagnostic disclosure may be helpful in informing practice.","PeriodicalId":73915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","volume":"4 1","pages":"e067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Background: The increase of cancer rates in India over the last decade has placed a significant psychosocial burden on patients and their families. To address the psychosocial issues, cancer centers in India have integrated psychosocial services into cancer care by routinely measuring the distress of patients and responding to their distress. In this study, we sought to determine the association between self-reported distress and patient demographic and clinical variables and awareness of their diagnosis and prognosis. Methods: The Department of Psycho-oncology conducted a cross-sectional, cohort study of patients who were being treated for a variety of cancers in a comprehensive cancer center in Chennai, India. Cancer patients (N = 2019) completed a standardized measure of distress and participated in a clinical interview during their admission to a ward or at the time of referral to psycho-oncology. The level of distress was measured by the NCCN Distress Thermometer and problem list. Chi-square tests were used to examine variations in overall distress. Multi-nominal logistic regression analyses were used to assess the level of patients’ reported distress as a function of clinical characteristics (stage of cancer, awareness of diagnosis and prognosis, physical symptoms). Results: The majority (60.3%) of the sample reported a moderate to high level of emotional distress. There were significant associations (P < .05) of younger age, awareness of diagnosis, prognosis, sleep issues, and physical pain with higher levels of distress. Patients who were aware of their diagnoses were more likely to report moderate (P < .01) or severe distress (P < .05) than those who were unaware. Patients who were aware of their prognoses were less likely to report moderate distress (P < .001) and severe distress (P < .001. Implications for Practice and Research: Given that a majority of patients rated at or above the clinical cut-off for distress, oncology centers in India need to provide training for professional psycho-oncology clinicians and incorporate psycho-oncology services to adequately address patients’ distress. Qualitative research may be needed to advance our understanding of specific social and cultural factors that may influence the psychosocial challenges faced by patients. Further investigation of patient distress related to diagnostic disclosure may be helpful in informing practice.
影响南印度癌症患者痛苦的心理社会因素
摘要背景:在过去十年中,印度癌症发病率的上升给患者及其家人带来了巨大的社会心理负担。为了解决心理社会问题,印度癌症中心通过定期测量患者的痛苦并对其痛苦做出反应,将心理社会服务纳入癌症护理。在这项研究中,我们试图确定自我报告的痛苦与患者人口统计学和临床变量以及对其诊断和预后的认识之间的关系。方法:精神科对在印度金奈癌症综合中心接受各种癌症治疗的患者进行了横断面队列研究。癌症患者(N = 2019)完成了痛苦的标准化测量,并在入住病房或转诊至心理肿瘤学时参加了临床访谈。通过NCCN遇险温度计和问题清单测量遇险程度。卡方检验用于检验整体痛苦的变化。多指标逻辑回归分析用于评估患者报告的痛苦程度与临床特征(癌症分期、诊断和预后意识、身体症状)的关系。结果:大多数(60.3%)的样本报告了中度至高度的情绪困扰。有显著的相关性(P < .05)年龄较小,对诊断、预后、睡眠问题和身体疼痛的认识较高。知道自己的诊断的患者更有可能报告中度(P < .01)或严重痛苦(P < .05)比那些不知道的人。了解预后的患者报告中度痛苦的可能性较小(P < .001)和严重痛苦(P < .001.对实践和研究的影响:鉴于大多数患者的痛苦程度达到或超过临床临界值,印度的肿瘤中心需要为专业的心理肿瘤学临床医生提供培训,并纳入心理肿瘤学服务,以充分解决患者的痛苦。可能需要进行定性研究,以加深我们对可能影响患者面临的心理社会挑战的特定社会和文化因素的理解。进一步调查与诊断披露相关的患者痛苦可能有助于为实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信